These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. In praise of mercury sphygmomanometers. Electronic readings of blood pressure seem to be higher than readings obtained with mercury sphygmomanometers. Ireland J BMJ; 2001 May; 322(7296):1249. PubMed ID: 11388188 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of electronic sphygmomanometers. Hartley S; Bello G; McKinley WJ Br J Gen Pract; 2004 Jan; 54(498):59. PubMed ID: 15002426 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Will the millimetre of mercury be replaced by the kilopascal? Colquitt PJ J Hypertens; 1999 Feb; 17(2):305-6. PubMed ID: 10067802 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. How accurate are sphygmomanometers? Mion D; Pierin AM J Hum Hypertens; 1998 Apr; 12(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 9607693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Devices for blood pressure measurement. Smith GR Prof Nurse; 2000 Feb; 15(5):337-40. PubMed ID: 10986960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of sphygmomanometers at pharmacies. Erdem DG; Erdem E; Dilek M; Aydogdu T; Selim N; Demiray F; Sari A; Akpolat T Kidney Blood Press Res; 2009; 32(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 19622898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Blood pressure measurement in patients with rate controlled atrial fibrillation using mercury sphygmomanometer and Omron HEM-750CP deice in the clinic setting. Jani B; Bulpitt CJ; Rajkumar C J Hum Hypertens; 2006 Jul; 20(7):543-5. PubMed ID: 16598291 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Calibration and safety of sphygmomanometers in health centers of Murcia]. Antón JJ; Menárguez JF; Alcántara PA; Díaz MJ; Sánchez MC Aten Primaria; 1992 Oct; 10(6):817-20. PubMed ID: 1457703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Blood pressure measurement. Doctors who cannot calibrate sphygmomanometers should stop taking blood pressures. Marshall T; Rouse A BMJ; 2001 Oct; 323(7316):806. PubMed ID: 11669078 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of two sphygmomanometers that may replace the traditional mercury column in the healthcare workplace. Elliott WJ; Young PE; DeVivo L; Feldstein J; Black HR Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 17303984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated sphygmomanometers should not replace manual ones, based on current evidence. Turner MJ; van Schalkwyk JM Am J Hypertens; 2008 Aug; 21(8):845; author reply 846. PubMed ID: 18648356 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The results of the campaign for evaluating sphygmomanometers accuracy and their physical conditions. Mion Júnior D; Pierin AM; Alavarce DC; Vasconcellos JH Arq Bras Cardiol; 2000 Jan; 74(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 10935290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inaccurate, leaky sphygmomanometers are still common. McCartney P; Crawford D Br J Gen Pract; 2003 Jan; 53(486):61-2. PubMed ID: 12564285 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children. Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]