These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15046428)

  • 1. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A two-year study.
    Glyn-Jones S; Gill HS; McLardy-Smith P; Murray DW
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2004 Mar; 86(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 15046428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Survivorship and clinical outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum ten years' follow-up.
    Azam MQ; McMahon S; Hawdon G; Sankineani SR
    Int Orthop; 2016 Jan; 40(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 25820838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Good diagnostic performance of early migration as a predictor of late aseptic loosening of acetabular cups: results from ten years of follow-up with Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA).
    Nieuwenhuijse MJ; Valstar ER; Kaptein BL; Nelissen RG
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 May; 94(10):874-80. PubMed ID: 22617914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Short and mid-term outcomes and functional results in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty at 5 years follow-up: the Spanish experience.
    Pérez-Moro OS; Fernández-Cuadros ME; Neira-Borrajo I; Aranda-Izquierdo E; Albaladejo-Florin MJ; Llopis-Miró R
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Apr; 20(1):172. PubMed ID: 30992064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of femoral component migration between Refobacin bone cement R and Palacos R + G in cemented total hip arthroplasty: A randomised controlled roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis and clinical study.
    van der Voort P; Valstar ER; Kaptein BL; Fiocco M; van der Heide HJ; Nelissen RG
    Bone Joint J; 2016 Oct; 98-B(10):1333-1341. PubMed ID: 27694586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of two resurfacing arthroplasty implants: medium-term clinical and radiographic results.
    Nam D; Maher P; Rebolledo BJ; Su EP
    Hip Int; 2012; 22(5):566-73. PubMed ID: 23100155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical, functional and radiographic long-term follow-up (7-12 years) of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing, including metal ions evaluation: a single surgeon series.
    Ouwendijk M; VAN DER Bracht H; Jansegers E
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2024 Mar; 90(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 38669647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A five-year radiostereometric follow-up of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Itayem R; Arndt A; McMinn DJ; Daniel J; Lundberg A
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Sep; 89(9):1140-3. PubMed ID: 17905947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A two-year radiostereometric follow-up of the first generation Birmingham mid head resection arthroplasty.
    Itayem R; Arndt A; Daniel J; McMinn DJ; Lundberg A
    Hip Int; 2014; 24(4):355-62. PubMed ID: 24817401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Short-term Results of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing in the United States.
    Nam D; Nunley RM; Ruh EL; Engh CA; Rogerson JS; Brooks PJ; Raterman SJ; Su EP; Barrack RL
    Orthopedics; 2015 Aug; 38(8):e715-21. PubMed ID: 26270759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term results of Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty in Asian patients.
    Uemura K; Takao M; Hamada H; Sakai T; Ohzono K; Sugano N
    J Artif Organs; 2018 Mar; 21(1):117-123. PubMed ID: 28856453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Independent predictors of revision following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a retrospective cohort study using National Joint Registry data.
    Jameson SS; Baker PN; Mason J; Porter ML; Deehan DJ; Reed MR
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jun; 94(6):746-54. PubMed ID: 22628587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hybrid alumina total hip arthroplasty using a press-fit metal-backed socket in patients younger than 55 years. A six- to 11-year evaluation.
    Bizot P; Hannouche D; Nizard R; Witvoet J; Sedel L
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2004 Mar; 86(2):190-4. PubMed ID: 15046431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Femoral component neck fracture after failed hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Bos PK; van Biezen FC; Weinans H
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1570.e1-4. PubMed ID: 21397452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Birmingham hip resurfacing in patients who are seventy years of age or older.
    Carrothers AD; Gilbert RE; Richardson JB
    Hip Int; 2011; 21(2):217-24. PubMed ID: 21462151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Failure rates of metal-on-metal hip resurfacings: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.
    Smith AJ; Dieppe P; Howard PW; Blom AW;
    Lancet; 2012 Nov; 380(9855):1759-66. PubMed ID: 23036895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The mean ten-year results of metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Amstutz HC; Le Duff MJ
    Bone Joint J; 2018 Nov; 100-B(11):1424-1433. PubMed ID: 30418058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Residual groin pain at a minimum of two years after metal-on-metal THA with a twenty-eight-millimeter femoral head, THA with a large-diameter femoral head, and hip resurfacing.
    Lavigne M; Laffosse JM; Ganapathi M; Girard J; Vendittoli P
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 May; 93 Suppl 2():93-8. PubMed ID: 21543697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fixation of the short global tissue-sparing hip stem.
    Nieuwenhuijse MJ; Vehmeijer SBW; Mathijsen NMC; Keizer SB
    Bone Joint J; 2020 Jun; 102-B(6):699-708. PubMed ID: 32475246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing.
    Pollard TC; Baker RP; Eastaugh-Waring SJ; Bannister GC
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 May; 88(5):592-600. PubMed ID: 16645103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.