These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15048953)
1. With an eye toward patient care. Selvaggi SM Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Apr; 30(4):217-9. PubMed ID: 15048953 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality assessment in the age of machine-aided cervical cytology screening. Renshaw AA Cancer; 2004 Dec; 102(6):345-7. PubMed ID: 15540251 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Audit shows weaknesses in cervical cancer screening. Ferriman A BMJ; 2001 May; 322(7295):1141. PubMed ID: 11348903 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. European guidelines on cervical screening. Smith JH; Desai MS Cytopathology; 2007 Aug; 18(4):211-2. PubMed ID: 17635160 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The cytology proficiency dilemma: the case for computer-based testing. Quarngesser SS Am Clin Lab; 1996; 15(10):18. PubMed ID: 10164049 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Recommendations that could improve performance of colposcopy and cytology. Dina R Cytopathology; 2008 Dec; 19(6):338-40. PubMed ID: 19040544 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality assurance in cervical cytopathology. Light AM Cytopathology; 1997 Aug; 8(4):290-2. PubMed ID: 9252748 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [An operative model: verification of the quality of the screening Pap test ]. Montanari GR; Arnaud S; Berardengo E; Campione D; Cozzani C; Parisio F; Viberti L; Ghiringhello B Pathologica; 2001 Oct; 93(5):609-10. PubMed ID: 11725370 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality control in cytologic screening. Cecchini S; Grazzini G; Bonardi R; Ciatto S Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(3):436. PubMed ID: 8498145 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Screening for cervix cancer--where are we going?]. Kjaer SK Ugeskr Laeger; 2000 May; 162(21):3015. PubMed ID: 10850187 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Screening for cervix cancer--a successful program that should be improved]. Andrae B; Strander B Lakartidningen; 2000 Aug; 97(35):3784-5. PubMed ID: 11016237 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Rapid pre-screening of cervical smears as a method of internal quality control in a cervical screening programme. Tavares SB; de Sousa NL; Manrique EJ; de Albuquerque ZB; Zeferino LC; Amaral RG Cytopathology; 2008 Aug; 19(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 18476988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Cervical smears taken by physicians' assistants are of lesser quality than smears taken by family physicians, but almost as good as the national average]. van Rijswijk A Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Feb; 144(8):399. PubMed ID: 10703599 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Public expectations, achievable cervical screening sensitivity, and the standard of practice. Austin RM Cancer; 2003 Feb; 99(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 12589638 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. What are the current Pap test guidelines? Schorn M Nursing; 2004 Dec; 34(12):26. PubMed ID: 15572920 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Planning of national cytologic cervical cancer detection in Sweden. Ringertz N Acta Cytol; 1969 Mar; 13(3):117-8. PubMed ID: 5253717 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [HPV test makes cytological examination more accurate. Cervical cancer can be discovered more efficiently]. Andersson S; Hjerpe A; Johansson BC; Hagmar B Lakartidningen; 2007 Sep 26-Oct 2; 104(39):2797-9. PubMed ID: 17958005 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]