These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15049299)
1. Will the real Charles Fried please stand up? Miller PB; Weijer C Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2003 Dec; 13(4):353-7. PubMed ID: 15049299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A critique of clinical equipoise. Therapeutic misconception in the ethics of clinical trials. Miller FG; Brody H Hastings Cent Rep; 2003; 33(3):19-28. PubMed ID: 12854452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The ubiquity and utility of the therapeutic misconception. Dresser R Soc Philos Policy; 2002; 19(2):271-94. PubMed ID: 12678090 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Indifference of subjects: an alternative to equipoise in randomized clinical trials. Veatch RM Soc Philos Policy; 2002; 19(2):295-323. PubMed ID: 12678091 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Consent and randomized clinical trials: are there moral or design problems? Kopelman L J Med Philos; 1986 Nov; 11(4):317-45. PubMed ID: 3819603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bench to bedside: mapping the moral terrain of clinical research. Joffe S; Miller FG Hastings Cent Rep; 2008; 38(2):30-42. PubMed ID: 18457227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Therapeutic beneficence and patient recruitment in randomized controlled clinical trials. Mann H Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(2):35-6. PubMed ID: 12189074 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A step toward truly protecting human subjects: reviewing the review boards. Albrecht RR Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):54-5. PubMed ID: 15035952 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Making research a requirement of treatment: why we should sometimes let doctors pressure patients to participate in research. Orentlicher D Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(5):20-8. PubMed ID: 16295261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What makes placebo-controlled trials unethical? Miller FG; Brody H Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(2):3-9. PubMed ID: 12189059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pulling the plug on clinical equipoise: a critique of Miller and Weijer. Gifford F Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2007 Sep; 17(3):203-26; discussion 227-46. PubMed ID: 18210981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical equipoise and the incoherence of research ethics. Miller FG; Brody H J Med Philos; 2007; 32(2):151-65. PubMed ID: 17454420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A closer look at the bad deal trial: beyond clinical equipoise. Jansen LA Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(5):29-36. PubMed ID: 16295262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Research ethics and the medical profession. Report of the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments. JAMA; 1996 Aug; 276(5):403-9. PubMed ID: 8683820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research revisited. Miller FG Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(4):59-61; discussion W42-5. PubMed ID: 16885110 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The clinician-investigator: unavoidable but manageable tension. Brody H; Miller FG Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2003 Dec; 13(4):329-46. PubMed ID: 15049297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Statistical and ethical issues in the design and conduct of phase I and II clinical trials of new anticancer agents. Ratain MJ; Mick R; Schilsky RL; Siegler M J Natl Cancer Inst; 1993 Oct; 85(20):1637-43. PubMed ID: 8411243 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of therapeutic research on informed consent and the ethics of clinical trials: a medical oncology perspective. Daugherty CK J Clin Oncol; 1999 May; 17(5):1601-17. PubMed ID: 10334550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]