These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15050262)

  • 1. Effect of posture and artificial tears on corneal power measurements with a handheld automated keratometer.
    Lam AK; Chan R; Chiu R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Mar; 30(3):645-52. PubMed ID: 15050262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of instrument rotation on handheld keratometry.
    Lam AK; Chan R; Chiu R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Dec; 30(12):2590-4. PubMed ID: 15617929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Keratometry evaluations with the Pentacam high resolution in comparison with the automated keratometry and conventional corneal topography.
    Módis L; Szalai E; Kolozsvári B; Németh G; Vajas A; Berta A
    Cornea; 2012 Jan; 31(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22081146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of fibrovascular traction and pooling of tears on corneal topographic changes induced by pterygium.
    Yasar T; Ozdemir M; Cinal A; Demirok A; Ilhan B; Durmus AC
    Eye (Lond); 2003 May; 17(4):492-6. PubMed ID: 12802349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of general anesthesia and muscle relaxants on keratometry measurements using a handheld keratometer.
    Al-Haddad C; Jurdy L; Farhat A; Farah F; Aouad M
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2014; 51(5):308-12. PubMed ID: 25036105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An evaluation of keratometry in 6-year-old children.
    Huynh SC; Mai TQ; Kifley A; Wang JJ; Rose KA; Mitchell P
    Cornea; 2006 May; 25(4):383-7. PubMed ID: 16670473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Refractive, topographic, tomographic, and aberrometric analysis of keratoconic eyes undergoing corneal cross-linking.
    Vinciguerra P; Albè E; Trazza S; Rosetta P; Vinciguerra R; Seiler T; Epstein D
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Mar; 116(3):369-78. PubMed ID: 19167087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Corneal power measurements in fixating versus anesthetized nonfixating children using a handheld keratometer.
    Rogers DL; Whitehead GR; Stephens JA; Fellows RR; Bremer DL; McGregor ML; Golden RP; Cassady CB; Rogers GL
    J AAPOS; 2010 Feb; 14(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 20227615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Consideration of the posterior corneal curvature for assessment of corneal power after myopic LASIK.
    Langenbucher A; Torres F; Behrens A; Suarez E; Haigis W; Seitz B
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Jun; 82(3 Pt 1):264-9. PubMed ID: 15115446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of Orbscan II posterior corneal curvature measurement for intraocular lens power calculation.
    Leyland M
    Eye (Lond); 2004 Apr; 18(4):357-60. PubMed ID: 15069429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the ocular refractive components: the Reykjavik Eye Study.
    Olsen T; Arnarsson A; Sasaki H; Sasaki K; Jonasson F
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 Jun; 85(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 17286626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of corneal powers obtained from 4 different devices.
    Shirayama M; Wang L; Weikert MP; Koch DD
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Oct; 148(4):528-535.e1. PubMed ID: 19541287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Corneal power measurements with the Pentacam Scheimpflug camera after myopic excimer laser surgery.
    Savini G; Barboni P; Profazio V; Zanini M; Hoffer KJ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 May; 34(5):809-13. PubMed ID: 18471637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparability and repeatability of corneal astigmatism measurements using different measurement technologies.
    Visser N; Berendschot TT; Verbakel F; de Brabander J; Nuijts RM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Oct; 38(10):1764-70. PubMed ID: 22999600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement of corneal power measurements obtained with a new corneal topographer.
    Mao X; Savini G; Zhuo Z; Feng Y; Zhang J; Wang Q; Chen H; Huang J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1561-9. PubMed ID: 23860010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Analysis of the dynamic changes of cornea after myopic excimer laser in situ keratomileusis using an Orbscan II topography system].
    Wu XY; Liu SZ; Hu SF; Li CL
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Sep; 42(9):777-81. PubMed ID: 17173736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Corneal topography with Scheimpflug imaging and videokeratography: comparative study of normal eyes.
    Read SA; Collins MJ; Iskander DR; Davis BA
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jun; 35(6):1072-81. PubMed ID: 19465294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of corneal astigmatism and axis location in cataract patients measured by total corneal power, automated keratometry, and simulated keratometry.
    Srivannaboon S; Soeharnila ; Chirapapaisan C; Chonpimai P
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Dec; 38(12):2088-93. PubMed ID: 22985831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of Gonioscopy on keratometry and corneal surface topography.
    George MK; Kuriakose T; DeBroff BM; Emerson JW
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2006 Jun; 6():26. PubMed ID: 16780595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Repeatability and comparability of automated keratometry: the Nikon NRK-8000, the Nidek KM-800 and the Bausch and Lomb keratometer.
    Elliott M; Simpson T; Richter D; Fonn D
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1998 May; 18(3):285-93. PubMed ID: 9829116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.