These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15050585)

  • 1. Keep it simple: a case for using classical minimum norm estimation in the analysis of EEG and MEG data.
    Hauk O
    Neuroimage; 2004 Apr; 21(4):1612-21. PubMed ID: 15050585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vector-based spatial-temporal minimum L1-norm solution for MEG.
    Huang MX; Dale AM; Song T; Halgren E; Harrington DL; Podgorny I; Canive JM; Lewis S; Lee RR
    Neuroimage; 2006 Jul; 31(3):1025-37. PubMed ID: 16542857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing and improving the spatial accuracy in MEG source localization by depth-weighted minimum-norm estimates.
    Lin FH; Witzel T; Ahlfors SP; Stufflebeam SM; Belliveau JW; Hämäläinen MS
    Neuroimage; 2006 May; 31(1):160-71. PubMed ID: 16520063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multiple sparse priors for the M/EEG inverse problem.
    Friston K; Harrison L; Daunizeau J; Kiebel S; Phillips C; Trujillo-Barreto N; Henson R; Flandin G; Mattout J
    Neuroimage; 2008 Feb; 39(3):1104-20. PubMed ID: 17997111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new wavelet transform to sparsely represent cortical current densities for EEG/MEG inverse problems.
    Liao K; Zhu M; Ding L
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Aug; 111(2):376-88. PubMed ID: 23706527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A framework for the design of flexible cross-talk functions for spatial filtering of EEG/MEG data: DeFleCT.
    Hauk O; Stenroos M
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2014 Apr; 35(4):1642-53. PubMed ID: 23616402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
    David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. EEG minimum-norm estimation compared with MEG dipole fitting in the localization of somatosensory sources at S1.
    Komssi S; Huttunen J; Aronen HJ; Ilmoniemi RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Mar; 115(3):534-42. PubMed ID: 15036048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of noise-normalized minimum norm estimates for MEG analysis using multiple resolution metrics.
    Hauk O; Wakeman DG; Henson R
    Neuroimage; 2011 Feb; 54(3):1966-74. PubMed ID: 20884360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy.
    Liu AK; Dale AM; Belliveau JW
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 May; 16(1):47-62. PubMed ID: 11870926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the spatial resolution of source imaging techniques in high-density EEG and MEG.
    Hedrich T; Pellegrino G; Kobayashi E; Lina JM; Grova C
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 157():531-544. PubMed ID: 28619655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantification of the benefit from integrating MEG and EEG data in minimum l2-norm estimation.
    Molins A; Stufflebeam SM; Brown EN; Hämäläinen MS
    Neuroimage; 2008 Sep; 42(3):1069-77. PubMed ID: 18602485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of MEG source reconstruction method on source-space connectivity estimation: A comparison between minimum-norm solution and beamforming.
    Hincapié AS; Kujala J; Mattout J; Pascarella A; Daligault S; Delpuech C; Mery D; Cosmelli D; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():29-42. PubMed ID: 28479475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bayesian model averaging in EEG/MEG imaging.
    Trujillo-Barreto NJ; Aubert-Vázquez E; Valdés-Sosa PA
    Neuroimage; 2004 Apr; 21(4):1300-19. PubMed ID: 15050557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mapping cortical dynamics using simultaneous MEG/EEG and anatomically-constrained minimum-norm estimates: an auditory attention example.
    Lee AK; Larson E; Maddox RK
    J Vis Exp; 2012 Oct; (68):e4262. PubMed ID: 23128363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Linear inverse solutions: simulations from a realistic head model in MEG.
    Soufflet L; Boeijinga PH
    Brain Topogr; 2005; 18(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 16341577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mapping the signal-to-noise-ratios of cortical sources in magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography.
    Goldenholz DM; Ahlfors SP; Hämäläinen MS; Sharon D; Ishitobi M; Vaina LM; Stufflebeam SM
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Apr; 30(4):1077-86. PubMed ID: 18465745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adaptive cortical parcellations for source reconstructed EEG/MEG connectomes.
    Farahibozorg SR; Henson RN; Hauk O
    Neuroimage; 2018 Apr; 169():23-45. PubMed ID: 28893608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mixed-norm estimates for the M/EEG inverse problem using accelerated gradient methods.
    Gramfort A; Kowalski M; Hämäläinen M
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Apr; 57(7):1937-61. PubMed ID: 22421459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A multiresolution framework to MEG/EEG source imaging.
    Gavit L; Baillet S; Mangin JF; Pescatore J; Garnero L
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2001 Oct; 48(10):1080-7. PubMed ID: 11585031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.