113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1505182)
41. Allergic contact hypersensitivity to nickel, neomycin, ethylenediamine, and benzocaine. Relationships between age, sex, history of exposure, and reactivity to standard patch tests and use tests in a general population.
Prystowsky SD; Allen AM; Smith RW; Nonomura JH; Odom RB; Akers WA
Arch Dermatol; 1979 Aug; 115(8):959-62. PubMed ID: 157103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. An arm immersion model of compromised skin (II). Influence on minimal eliciting patch test concentrations of nickel.
Allenby CF; Basketter DA
Contact Dermatitis; 1993 Mar; 28(3):129-33. PubMed ID: 8462286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Pathogenesis of orally induced flare-up reactions at old patch sites in nickel allergy.
Christensen OB; Beckstead JH; Daniels TE; Maibach HI
Acta Derm Venereol; 1985; 65(4):298-304. PubMed ID: 2413683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Nickel allergy: relationship between patch test and repeated open application test thresholds.
Fischer LA; Johansen JD; Menné T
Br J Dermatol; 2007 Oct; 157(4):723-9. PubMed ID: 17634081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Combined effects of irritants and allergens. Synergistic effects of nickel and sodium lauryl sulfate in nickel- sensitized individuals.
Agner T; Johansen JD; Overgaard L; Vølund A; Basketter D; Menné T
Contact Dermatitis; 2002 Jul; 47(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 12225409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. The reactivity of the back revisited. Are there differences in reactivity in different parts of the back?
Björk AK; Bruze M; Engfeldt M; Nielsen C; Svedman C
Contact Dermatitis; 2017 Jan; 76(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 27593358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Patients with atopic dermatitis have attenuated and distinct contact hypersensitivity responses to common allergens in skin.
Correa da Rosa J; Malajian D; Shemer A; Rozenblit M; Dhingra N; Czarnowicki T; Khattri S; Ungar B; Finney R; Xu H; Zheng X; Estrada YD; Peng X; Suárez-Fariñas M; Krueger JG; Guttman-Yassky E
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2015 Mar; 135(3):712-20. PubMed ID: 25583101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Quantification of cutaneous oedema in patch test reactions by measurement of skin thickness with high-frequency pulsed ultrasound.
Serup J; Staberg B; Klemp P
Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Feb; 10(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 6713845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Strong allergic patch test reactions may indicate a general disposition for contact allergy.
Brasch J; Schnuch A; Uter W;
Allergy; 2006 Mar; 61(3):364-9. PubMed ID: 16436147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Vesicular Contact Reaction May Progress into Erythema Multiforme.
Czarnecka-Operacz M; Jenerowicz D; Szulczyńska-Gabor J; Teresiak-Mikołajczak E; Szyfter-Harris J; Bowszyc-Dmochowska M
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2016 Dec; 24(4):307-309. PubMed ID: 28128086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Nickel-elicited systemic contact dermatitis.
Dou X; Liu LL; Zhu XJ
Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Mar; 48(3):126-9. PubMed ID: 12755723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Patch testing in Iranian children with allergic contact dermatitis.
Mortazavi H; Ehsani A; Sajjadi SS; Aghazadeh N; Arian E
BMC Dermatol; 2016 Jul; 16(1):10. PubMed ID: 27405224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Study on Chinese common allergens of contact dermatitis.
Fan WX; Zhao B
Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1990; 38(5):158-61. PubMed ID: 2286161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Ultrasound description and quantification of irritant reactions induced by dithranol at different concentrations. A comparison with visual assessment and colorimetric measurements.
Schiavi ME; Belletti B; Seidenari S
Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Apr; 34(4):272-7. PubMed ID: 8730166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Screening for skin-sensitizing allergens among patients with clinically suspected allergic contact dermatitis.
Shakoor Z; Al-Mutairi AS; Al-Shenaifi AM; Al-Abdulsalam AM; Al-Shirah BZ; Al-Harbi SA
Saudi Med J; 2017 Sep; 38(9):922-927. PubMed ID: 28889150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Iontophoresis of nickel elicits a delayed cutaneous response in sensitized individuals that is similar to an allergic patch test reaction.
Brasch J; Hüttemann M; Proksch E
Contact Dermatitis; 2000 Jan; 42(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 10644023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Lymphocyte transformation induced by nickel sulphate: an in vitro study of subjects with and without a positive nickel patch test.
Svejgaard E; Morling N; Svejgaard A; Veien NK
Acta Derm Venereol; 1978; 58(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 78640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [Use of a new prepared patch in general practice (Epiquick)].
Hornstein M
Z Hautkr; 1987 Dec; 62(24):1719-23. PubMed ID: 2964138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Effects of pretreatment with a urea-containing emollient on nickel allergic skin reactions.
Kuzmina N; Nyrén M; Lodén M; Edlund F; Emtestam L
Acta Derm Venereol; 2005; 85(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 15848983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Strip patch test vs. conventional patch test: investigation of dose-dependent test sensitivities in nickel- and chromium-sensitive subjects.
Dickel H; Kamphowe J; Geier J; Altmeyer P; Kuss O
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2009 Sep; 23(9):1018-25. PubMed ID: 19470058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
