BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15053092)

  • 1. Predicting tense: finite verb morphology and subject pronouns in the speech of typically-developing children and children with specific language impairment.
    Charest MJ; Leonard LB
    J Child Lang; 2004 Feb; 31(1):231-46. PubMed ID: 15053092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Production of tense morphology by Afrikaans-speaking children with and without specific language impairment.
    Southwood F; van Hout R
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Apr; 53(2):394-413. PubMed ID: 20360464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do data from children with specific language impairment support the agreement/tense omission model?
    Pine JM; Joseph KL; Conti-Ramsden G
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 47(4):913-23. PubMed ID: 15324295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Grammatical morphology in children learning English as a second language: implications of similarities with specific language impairment.
    Paradis J
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2005 Jul; 36(3):172-87. PubMed ID: 16175882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tense and finiteness in the speech of children with specific language impairment acquiring Hebrew.
    Leonard LB; Dromi E; Adam G; Zadunaisky-Ehrlich S
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2000; 35(3):319-35. PubMed ID: 10963017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tense and agreement morphemes in the speech of children with specific language impairment during intervention: phase 2.
    Leonard LB; Camarata SM; Pawłowska M; Brown B; Camarata MN
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Aug; 49(4):749-70. PubMed ID: 16908873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Testing the agreement/tense omission model: why the data on children's use of non-nominative 3psg subjects count against the ATOM.
    Pine JM; Rowland CF; Lieven EV; Theakston AL
    J Child Lang; 2005 May; 32(2):269-89. PubMed ID: 16045251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Third person pronoun errors by children with and without language impairment.
    Moore ME
    J Commun Disord; 2001; 34(3):207-28. PubMed ID: 11409604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Finite verb morphology and phonological length in the speech of children with specific language impairment.
    Polite EJ; Leonard LB
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2006 Dec; 20(10):751-60. PubMed ID: 17361924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tense and agreement in the speech of children with specific language impairment: patterns of generalization through intervention.
    Leonard LB; Camarata SM; Brown B; Camarata MN
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Dec; 47(6):1363-79. PubMed ID: 15842016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Toward tense as a clinical marker of specific language impairment in English-speaking children.
    Rice ML; Wexler K
    J Speech Hear Res; 1996 Dec; 39(6):1239-57. PubMed ID: 8959609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of grammatical morphemes reflecting aspect and modality by children with specific language impairment.
    Leonard LB; Deevy P; Miller CA; Charest M; Kurtz R; Rauf L
    J Child Lang; 2003 Nov; 30(4):769-95. PubMed ID: 14686084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tense over time: testing the agreement/tense omission model as an account of the pattern of tense-marking provision in early child English.
    Pine JM; Conti-Ramsden G; Joseph KL; Lieven EV; Serratrice L
    J Child Lang; 2008 Feb; 35(1):55-75. PubMed ID: 18300429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Specific language impairment in Swedish: the status of verb morphology and word order.
    Hansson K; Nettelbladt U; Leonard LB
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Aug; 43(4):848-64. PubMed ID: 11386473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lexical aspect and the use of verb morphology by children with specific language impairment.
    Leonard LB; Deevy P; Kurtz R; Krantz Chorev L; Owen A; Polite E; Elam D; Finneran D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 50(3):759-77. PubMed ID: 17538114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Testing the agreement/tense omission model using an elicited imitation paradigm.
    Ambridge B; Pine JM
    J Child Lang; 2006 Nov; 33(4):879-98. PubMed ID: 17153865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Epistemic uncertainty: Turkish children with specific language impairment and their comprehension of tense and aspect.
    Yarbay Duman T; Topbaş S
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2016 Nov; 51(6):732-744. PubMed ID: 27074978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surface forms and grammatical functions: past tense and passive participle use by children with specific language impairment.
    Leonard LB; Deevy P; Miller CA; Rauf L; Charest M; Robert K
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2003 Feb; 46(1):43-55. PubMed ID: 12647887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The acquisition of tense and agreement morphemes by children with specific language impairment during intervention: phase 3.
    Leonard LB; Camarata SM; Pawlowska M; Brown B; Camarata MN
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Feb; 51(1):120-5. PubMed ID: 18230859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The expression of aspect in Cantonese-speaking children with specific language impairment.
    Fletcher P; Leonard LB; Stokes SF; Wong AM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):621-34. PubMed ID: 16197277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.