These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15053700)

  • 1. You say "probable" and I say "likely": improving interpersonal communication with verbal probability phrases.
    Karelitz TM; Budescu DV
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2004 Mar; 10(1):25-41. PubMed ID: 15053700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. You said it before and you'll say it again: expectations of consistency in communication.
    Shintel H; Keysar B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):357-69. PubMed ID: 17352617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is guilt 'likely' or 'not certain'? Contrast with previous probabilities determines choice of verbal terms.
    Juanchich M; Teigen KH; Villejoubert G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Nov; 135(3):267-77. PubMed ID: 20723869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do people really say it is "likely" when they believe it is only "possible"? Effect of politeness on risk communication.
    Juanchich M; Sirota M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(7):1268-75. PubMed ID: 23782394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Directionality of Verbal Probability Expressions: Effects on Decisions, Predictions, and Probabilistic Reasoning.
    Teigen KH; Brun W
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 1999 Nov; 80(2):155-190. PubMed ID: 10527815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tactful or doubtful? Expectations of politeness explain the severity bias in the interpretation of probability phrases.
    Bonnefon JF; Villejoubert G
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Sep; 17(9):747-51. PubMed ID: 16984289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Forward and backward number translation requires conceptual mediation in both balanced and unbalanced bilinguals.
    Duyck W; Brysbaert M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Oct; 30(5):889-906. PubMed ID: 15462627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automatic optimism: the affective basis of judgments about the likelihood of future events.
    Lench HC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 May; 138(2):187-200. PubMed ID: 19397379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Seeing the forest when entry is unlikely: probability and the mental representation of events.
    Wakslak CJ; Trope Y; Liberman N; Alony R
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Nov; 135(4):641-53. PubMed ID: 17087578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Probability information in risk communication: a review of the research literature.
    Visschers VH; Meertens RM; Passchier WW; de Vries NN
    Risk Anal; 2009 Feb; 29(2):267-87. PubMed ID: 19000070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Re(de)fining the orthographic neighborhood: the role of addition and deletion neighbors in lexical decision and reading.
    Davis CJ; Perea M; Acha J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1550-70. PubMed ID: 19803656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Communicating the uncertainty of harms and benefits of medical interventions.
    Politi MC; Han PK; Col NF
    Med Decis Making; 2007; 27(5):681-95. PubMed ID: 17873256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nomina sunt omina: on the inductive potential of nouns and adjectives in person perception.
    Carnaghi A; Maass A; Gresta S; Bianchi M; Cadinu M; Arcuri L
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 May; 94(5):839-59. PubMed ID: 18444742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decision-making processes: sensitivity to sequentially experienced outcome probabilities.
    Boyer TW
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2007 May; 97(1):28-43. PubMed ID: 17321540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The existence bias.
    Eidelman S; Crandall CS; Pattershall J
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Nov; 97(5):765-75. PubMed ID: 19857000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving communication of uncertainty in the reports of the intergovernmental panel on climate change.
    Budescu DV; Broomell S; Por HH
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Mar; 20(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 19207697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Directional verbal probabilities: inconsistencies between preferential judgments and numerical meanings.
    Honda H; Yamagishi K
    Exp Psychol; 2006; 53(3):161-70. PubMed ID: 16955725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Striving for optimal relevance when answering questions.
    Gibbs RW; Bryant GA
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):345-69. PubMed ID: 17433280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. It is, uh, very likely? The impact of prosodic uncertainty cues on the perception and interpretation of spoken verbal probability phrases.
    Vromans RD; van de Ven CCM; Willems SJW; Krahmer EJ; Swerts MGJ
    Risk Anal; 2024 Oct; 44(10):2496-2515. PubMed ID: 38742599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When does information about probability count in choices under risk?
    Tyszka T; Zaleskiewicz T
    Risk Anal; 2006 Dec; 26(6):1623-36. PubMed ID: 17184402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.