221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15053721)
1. Evaluating the impact of partial factorial invariance on selection in two populations.
Millsap RE; Kwok OM
Psychol Methods; 2004 Mar; 9(1):93-115. PubMed ID: 15053721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An essay on measurement and factorial invariance.
Meredith W; Teresi JA
Med Care; 2006 Nov; 44(11 Suppl 3):S69-77. PubMed ID: 17060838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Factorial validity and invariance of a survey measuring psychosocial correlates of colorectal cancer screening in Ontario, Canada--a replication study.
Ritvo P; Myers R; Del Giudice ML; Pazsat L; Campbell PT; Howlett RI; Mai V; Sullivan T; Tiro J; Rabeneck L
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2008 Nov; 17(11):3279-83. PubMed ID: 18990772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Studying group and time invariance in maximal reliability for multiple-component measuring instruments via covariance structure modelling.
Raykov T
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 Nov; 58(Pt 2):301-17. PubMed ID: 16293202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factorial invariance of the 13-item Sense of Coherence scale across gender.
Hittner JB
J Health Psychol; 2007 Mar; 12(2):273-80. PubMed ID: 17284491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Factorial invariance of child self-report across race/ethnicity groups: a multigroup confirmatory factor analysis approach utilizing the PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales.
Limbers CA; Newman DA; Varni JW
Ann Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 19(8):575-81. PubMed ID: 19576538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measurement invariance versus selection invariance: is fair selection possible?
Borsboom D; Romeijn JW; Wicherts JM
Psychol Methods; 2008 Jun; 13(2):75-98. PubMed ID: 18557679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Overview of quantitative measurement methods. Equivalence, invariance, and differential item functioning in health applications.
Teresi JA
Med Care; 2006 Nov; 44(11 Suppl 3):S39-49. PubMed ID: 17060834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamical system approach to factor analysis parameter estimation.
Trendafilov NT
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 May; 56(Pt 1):27-46. PubMed ID: 12803820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The factor structure and factorial invariance of the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) across time: evidence from two community-based samples.
Mäkikangas A; Feldt T; Kinnunen U; Tolvanen A; Kinnunen ML; Pulkkinen L
Psychol Assess; 2006 Dec; 18(4):444-51. PubMed ID: 17154766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Generalization of the Brown-Forsythe approach to factorial designs].
Vallejo Seco G; Fernández García MP; Livacic Rojas PE
Psicothema; 2008 Nov; 20(4):969-73. PubMed ID: 18940112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factorial validity and measurement invariance of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale in clinical and nonclinical samples.
Meganck R; Vanheule S; Desmet M
Assessment; 2008 Mar; 15(1):36-47. PubMed ID: 18258730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factorial invariance of child self-report across healthy and chronic health condition groups: a confirmatory factor analysis utilizing the PedsQLTM 4.0 Generic Core Scales.
Limbers CA; Newman DA; Varni JW
J Pediatr Psychol; 2008 Jul; 33(6):630-9. PubMed ID: 18165221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A cross-sectional evaluation of the factorial invariance of anxiety sensitivity in adolescents and young adults.
Dehon C; Weems CF; Stickle TR; Costa NM; Berman SL
Behav Res Ther; 2005 Jun; 43(6):799-810. PubMed ID: 15890170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Choosing the best method for local validity estimation: relative accuracy of meta-analysis versus a local study versus Bayes-analysis.
Newman DA; Jacobs RR; Bartram D
J Appl Psychol; 2007 Sep; 92(5):1394-413. PubMed ID: 17845093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Weak measurement invariance with respect to unmeasured variables: an implication of strict factorial invariance.
Lubke GH; Dolan CV; Kelderman H; Mellenbergh GJ
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):231-48. PubMed ID: 14633334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factorial structure and cross-cultural invariance of the Oral Impacts on Daily Performances.
Astrøm AN; Mtaya M
Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):293-9. PubMed ID: 19583758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multiple imputation for item scores when test data are factorially complex.
van Ginkel JR; van der Ark LA; Sijtsma K
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 Nov; 60(Pt 2):315-37. PubMed ID: 17971272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Confirming the three-factor structure of the quality of relationships inventory within couples.
Verhofstadt LL; Buysse A; Rosseel Y; Peene OJ
Psychol Assess; 2006 Mar; 18(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 16594808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factorial modeling of differential distractor functioning in multiple-choice items.
Wang WC
J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(3):238-56. PubMed ID: 12029170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
