These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15054314)

  • 1. [A study of the perception of radiographic density with magnitude estimation: density perception of high-density areas].
    Imura H; Miyagawa T; Badono M; Takashima K; Hamada J
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Feb; 60(2):255-63. PubMed ID: 15054314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Endodontic measurement accuracy and perceived radiograph quality: effects of film speed and density.
    Sheaffer JC; Eleazer PD; Scheetz JP; Clark SJ; Farman AG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Oct; 96(4):441-8. PubMed ID: 14561969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contrast perception in digitized panoramic radiographs compared with their film-based origin.
    Schulze RK; Rosing ST; D'Hoedt B
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Sep; 94(3):388-94. PubMed ID: 12324798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of various X-ray film/screen systems in demonstrating small simulated low-density lung nodules.
    Maruyama Y
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Aug; 58(9):509-15. PubMed ID: 9778937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceived quality of radiographic images after rapid processing of D- and F-speed direct-exposure intraoral x-ray films.
    Bernstein DI; Clark SJ; Scheetz JP; Farman AG; Rosenson B
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Oct; 96(4):486-91. PubMed ID: 14561976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimum tube voltage for chest radiographs obtained by psychophysical analysis.
    Asai Y; Tanabe Y; Ozaki Y; Kubota H; Matsumoto M; Kanamori H
    Med Phys; 1998 Nov; 25(11):2170-5. PubMed ID: 9829241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anchoring of lightness values by relative luminance and relative area.
    Gilchrist AL; Radonjić A
    J Vis; 2009 Aug; 9(9):13.1-10. PubMed ID: 19761346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Influence of "optical illusion" on detectability in diagnosis for head CT images: participation of optical illusion of light perception in medical image reading and diagnosis].
    Henmi S
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2006 Jul; 62(7):979-89. PubMed ID: 16874287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensitometric properties of Agfa Dentus OrthoLux, Agfa Dentus ST8G, and Kodak Ektavision panoramic radiographic film.
    Wakoh M; Nishikawa K; Kobayashi N; Farman AG; Kuroyanagi K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Feb; 91(2):244-51. PubMed ID: 11174605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Objective and subjective assessments of Kodak Ektaspeed plus new dental X-ray film: a comparison with other conventional X-ray films.
    Kitagawa H; Farman AG; Wakoh M; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1995 May; 36(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 8689744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychophysical properties of a new F-speed intraoral film.
    Mastoris M; Yoshiura K; Welander U; Tsiklakis K; Papadakis E; Li G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 May; 33(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 15371315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital chest radiography with a solid-state flat-panel x-ray detector: contrast-detail evaluation with processed images printed on film hard copy.
    Chotas HG; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 2001 Mar; 218(3):679-82. PubMed ID: 11230639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Visual impression of photographic density of the brain in head CT images: verification of optical illusion by visual subjective evaluation of medical images].
    Henmi S
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2002 Oct; 58(10):1383-92. PubMed ID: 12540766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the psychophysical properties of various intraoral film and digital systems by means of the perceptibility curve test.
    Yoshiura K; Welander U; McDavid WD; Li G; Shi XQ; Nakayama E; Shimizu M; Okamura K; Kanda S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 15314001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of scattered radiation and tube potential on radiographic contrast: comparison of two different dental X-ray films.
    Helmrot E; Carlsson GA; Eckerdal O; Sandborg M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Aug; 20(3):135-46. PubMed ID: 1807997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of a cathode-ray-tube and film for display of computed radiographic images.
    Cook LT; Cox GG; Insana MF; McFadden MA; Hall TJ; Gaborski RS; Lure FY
    Med Phys; 1998 Jul; 25(7 Pt 1):1132-8. PubMed ID: 9682198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the difficulty to think in ratios: a methodological bias in Stevens' magnitude estimation procedure.
    Mertens A; Mertens UK; Lerche V
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jul; 83(5):2347-2365. PubMed ID: 33791941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Periodontitis detection efficacy of film and digital images.
    Nair MK; Ludlow JB; Tyndall DA; Platin E; Denton G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 May; 85(5):608-12. PubMed ID: 9619682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Basic imaging properties of a new screen-film system for chest radiography.
    Higashida Y; Murakami Y; Yoshida A; Kastuda N; Moribe N; Bussaka H; Hamada T; Yoshida Y; Hidetoshi M; Takahashi M
    Med Phys; 1996 Aug; 23(8):1351-7. PubMed ID: 8873032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Brightness contrast-contrast induction model predicts assimilation and inverted assimilation effects.
    Barkan Y; Spitzer H; Einav S
    J Vis; 2008 Oct; 8(7):27.1-26. PubMed ID: 19146233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.