266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15055410)
21. Mammography, clinical breast exam, and pap testing: correlates of combined screening.
Pearlman DN; Rakowski W; Ehrich B
Am J Prev Med; 1996; 12(1):52-64. PubMed ID: 8776296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Racial/Ethnic Differences Affecting Adherence to Cancer Screening Guidelines Among Women.
Hirth JM; Laz TH; Rahman M; Berenson AB
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2016 Apr; 25(4):371-80. PubMed ID: 26579735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Changes in the social gradients for Pap smears and mammograms in Argentina: evidence from the 2005 and 2009 National Risk Factor Surveys.
De Maio FG; Linetzky B; Ferrante D
Public Health; 2012 Oct; 126(10):821-6. PubMed ID: 23083845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Mammography and Pap test screening among low-income foreign-born Hispanic women in USA.
Fernández MA; Tortolero-Luna G; Gold RS
Cad Saude Publica; 1998; 14 Suppl 3():133-47. PubMed ID: 9819472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparing acculturation scales and their relationship to cancer screening among older Mexican-American women.
Suarez L; Pulley L
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):41-7. PubMed ID: 8562221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Factors influencing the uptake of screening services for breast and cervical cancer in Taiwan.
Lin SJ
J R Soc Promot Health; 2008 Nov; 128(6):327-34. PubMed ID: 19058475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Demographic predictors of mammography and Pap smear screening in US women.
Calle EE; Flanders WD; Thun MJ; Martin LM
Am J Public Health; 1993 Jan; 83(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 8417607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Validation of recall of breast and cervical cancer screening by women in an ethnically diverse population.
McPhee SJ; Nguyen TT; Shema SJ; Nguyen B; Somkin C; Vo P; Pasick R
Prev Med; 2002 Nov; 35(5):463-73. PubMed ID: 12431895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The effect of access and satisfaction on regular mammogram and Papanicolaou test screening in a multiethnic population.
Somkin CP; McPhee SJ; Nguyen T; Stewart S; Shema SJ; Nguyen B; Pasick R
Med Care; 2004 Sep; 42(9):914-26. PubMed ID: 15319618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Socioeconomic disparities in preventive care persist despite universal coverage. Breast and cervical cancer screening in Ontario and the United States.
Katz SJ; Hofer TP
JAMA; 1994 Aug; 272(7):530-4. PubMed ID: 8046807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Impact of state-specific Medicaid reimbursement and eligibility policies on receipt of cancer screening.
Halpern MT; Romaire MA; Haber SG; Tangka FK; Sabatino SA; Howard DH
Cancer; 2014 Oct; 120(19):3016-24. PubMed ID: 25154930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Association between CBE, FOBT, and Pap smear adherence and mammography adherence among older low-income women.
Augustson EM; Vadaparampil ST; Paltoo DN; Kidd LR; O'Malley AS
Prev Med; 2003 Jun; 36(6):734-9. PubMed ID: 12744918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Sociodemographic factors of Pap smear screening in Taiwan.
Wang PD; Lin RS
Public Health; 1996 Mar; 110(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 8901257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Demographic predictors of clinical breast examination, mammography, and Pap test screening among older women.
Sherman JJ; Abel E; Tavakoli A
J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 1996 May; 8(5):231-6. PubMed ID: 8788735
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Mammograms and Pap smears for Australian deaf women.
Wollin J; Elder R
Cancer Nurs; 2003 Oct; 26(5):405-9. PubMed ID: 14710803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Improving cancer screening among women with mobility impairments: randomized controlled trial of a participatory workshop intervention.
Peterson JJ; Suzuki R; Walsh ES; Buckley DI; Krahn GL
Am J Health Promot; 2012; 26(4):212-6. PubMed ID: 22375570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Can breast and cervical cancer screening visits be used to enhance colorectal cancer screening?
Carlos RC; Fendrick AM; Ellis J; Bernstein SJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Oct; 1(10):769-76. PubMed ID: 17411698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Attendance rate in the Polish Cervical Cancer Screening Program in the years 2007-2009].
Spaczyński M; Karowicz-Bilinska A; Rokita W; Molińska-Glura M; Januszek-Michalecka L; Seroczyński P; Uchlik J; Nowak-Markwitz E
Ginekol Pol; 2010 Sep; 81(9):655-63. PubMed ID: 20973201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of a mobile unit on changes in knowledge and use of cervical cancer screening among rural Thai women.
Swaddiwudhipong W; Chaovakiratipong C; Nguntra P; Mahasakpan P; Lerdlukanavonge P; Koonchote S
Int J Epidemiol; 1995 Jun; 24(3):493-8. PubMed ID: 7672887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The impact of health status on physicians' intentions to offer cancer screening to older women.
Heflin MT; Pollak KI; Kuchibhatla MN; Branch LG; Oddone EZ
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci; 2006 Aug; 61(8):844-50. PubMed ID: 16912103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
