These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15055437)

  • 1. Influence of ultrasound, with and without water spray cooling, on removal of posts cemented with resin or zinc phosphate cements.
    Garrido AD; Fonseca TS; Alfredo E; Silva-Sousa YT; Sousa-Neto MD
    J Endod; 2004 Mar; 30(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 15055437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of several protocols for the application of ultrasound during the removal of cast intraradicular posts cemented with zinc phosphate cement.
    Garrido AD; Oliveira AG; Osório JE; Silva-Sousa YT; Sousa-Neto MD
    Int Endod J; 2009 Jul; 42(7):609-13. PubMed ID: 19467051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tensile bond strength of cast commercially pure titanium and cast gold-alloy posts and cores cemented with two luting agents.
    Menani LR; Ribeiro RF; Antunes RP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 18262015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of two luting agents used for the retention of cast dowel and cores.
    Habib B; von Fraunhofer JA; Driscoll CF
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Sep; 14(3):164-9. PubMed ID: 16336233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of root external temperature during the application of ultrasound in removal of intraradicular posts.
    Garrido AD; Fonseca TS; Silva-Sousa YT; Alfredo E; Sousa-Neto MD
    Gen Dent; 2007; 55(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 17333983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of two methods for the removal of root canal posts.
    Chandler NP; Qualtrough AJ; Purton DG
    Quintessence Int; 2003; 34(7):534-6. PubMed ID: 12946072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro evaluation of the effect of core diameter for removing radicular post with ultrasound.
    Alfredo E; Garrido AD; Souza-Filho CB; Correr-Sobrinho L; Sousa-Neto MD
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Jun; 31(6):590-4. PubMed ID: 15189318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of ultrasound on the retention of cast posts cemented with different agents.
    Gomes AP; Kubo CH; Santos RA; Santos DR; Padilha RQ
    Int Endod J; 2001 Mar; 34(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 11307266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of ultrasonic vibration on the retention of adhesively luted intra-radicular posts.
    Satterthwaite JD; Stokes AN
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2004 Sep; 12(3):101-4. PubMed ID: 15521391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of surface treatment of titanium posts on the tensile bond strength.
    Schmage P; Sohn J; Ozcan M; Nergiz I
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 16039707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative study of the effect of ultrasound on the removal of intracanal posts.
    Braga NM; Resende LM; Vasconcellos WA; Paulino SM; Sousa-Neto MD
    Gen Dent; 2009; 57(5):492-5. PubMed ID: 19903640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of ultrasound, with and without water spray cooling, on removal of posts cemented with resin or glass ionomer cements: An in-vitro study.
    Adarsha MS; Lata DA
    J Conserv Dent; 2010 Jul; 13(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 21116384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of the shape core on custom cast dowel and core removal by ultrasonic energy.
    Queiroz EC; Menezes MS; Biffi JC; Soares CJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Jun; 34(6):463-7. PubMed ID: 17518982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of ultrasonic vibration on post removal in extracted human premolar teeth.
    Johnson WT; Leary JM; Boyer DB
    J Endod; 1996 Sep; 22(9):487-8. PubMed ID: 9198432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retentive force of three fiber-reinforced resin composite posts and a zirconia post cemented with two adhesive luting agents: in vitro study.
    Polat ZS; Tacir IH; Eskimez S; Celik MY
    Dent Mater J; 2007 Sep; 26(5):672-6. PubMed ID: 18203467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of two ultrasonic instruments for post removal.
    Dixon EB; Kaczkowski PJ; Nicholls JI; Harrington GW
    J Endod; 2002 Feb; 28(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 11833682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of timing of coronal preparation on retention of cemented cast posts and cores.
    Al-Ali K; Talic Y; Abduljabbar T; Omar R
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(3):290-4. PubMed ID: 12854794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of resin cement film thickness on the pullout strength of a fiber-reinforced post system.
    D'Arcangelo C; Cinelli M; De Angelis F; D'Amario M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Sep; 98(3):193-8. PubMed ID: 17854620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors influencing the removal of posts.
    Hauman CH; Chandler NP; Purton DG
    Int Endod J; 2003 Oct; 36(10):687-90. PubMed ID: 14511226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Removal time of fiber posts versus titanium posts.
    Frazer RQ; Kovarik RE; Chance KB; Mitchell RJ
    Am J Dent; 2008 Jun; 21(3):175-8. PubMed ID: 18686770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.