These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15056027)

  • 1. MRA versus DSA in the assessment of occlusive disease in the aortic arch vessels: accuracy in detecting the severity, number, and length of stenoses.
    Loewe C; Schillinger M; Haumer M; Loewe-Grgurin M; Lammer J; Thurnher S; Fuchsjäger M; Cejna M
    J Endovasc Ther; 2004 Apr; 11(2):152-60. PubMed ID: 15056027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical utility of time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (TRICKS) magnetic resonance angiography for infrageniculate arterial occlusive disease.
    Mell M; Tefera G; Thornton F; Siepman D; Turnipseed W
    J Vasc Surg; 2007 Mar; 45(3):543-8; discussion 548. PubMed ID: 17223303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gadolinium-enhanced 3D MRA of the aortic arch vessels in the detection of atherosclerotic cerebrovascular occlusive disease.
    Krinsky G; Maya M; Rofsky N; Lebowitz J; Nelson PK; Ambrosino M; Kaminer E; Earls J; Masters L; Giangola G; Litt A; Weinreb J
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1998; 22(2):167-78. PubMed ID: 9530375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Noninvasive detection of steno-occlusive disease of the supra-aortic arteries with three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: a prospective, intra-individual comparative analysis with digital subtraction angiography.
    Willinek WA; von Falkenhausen M; Born M; Gieseke J; Höller T; Klockgether T; Textor HJ; Schild HH; Urbach H
    Stroke; 2005 Jan; 36(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 15569881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy and utility of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in planning carotid stenting.
    Timaran CH; Rosero EB; Valentine RJ; Modrall JG; Smith S; Clagett GP
    J Vasc Surg; 2007 Aug; 46(2):257-63; discussion 263-4. PubMed ID: 17600659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [First clinical results in a study of contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography with the 1.0 molar gadobutrol in peripheral arterial occlusive disease--comparison to intraarterial DSA].
    Schäfer FK; Schäfer PJ; Jahnke T; Walluscheck K; Priebe M; Hentsch A; Heller M; Brossmann J
    Rofo; 2003 Apr; 175(4):556-64. PubMed ID: 12677513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of MDCT in the determination of supraaortic artery stenosis using DSA as the reference standard.
    Toepker M; Mahabadi AA; Heinzle G; Hofmann W; Mathies R; Schuster A; Cejna M
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Dec; 80(3):e351-5. PubMed ID: 21156342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Inflammatory aortic arch syndrome: contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography in stenotic lesions].
    Both M; Reinhold-Keller E; Müller-Hülsbeck S; Biederer J; Gross WL; Heller M; Reuter M
    Rofo; 2004 Jan; 176(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 14712406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the aortoiliac vessels using a 1.0 molar contrast agent at 1.0 T with intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography].
    Mohrs OK; Oberholzer K; Krummenauer F; Bernhard S; Kalden P; Neufang A; Thelen M; Kreitner KF
    Rofo; 2004 Jul; 176(7):985-91. PubMed ID: 15237341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stenosis detection in failing hemodialysis access fistulas and grafts: comparison of color Doppler ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, and digital subtraction angiography.
    Doelman C; Duijm LE; Liem YS; Froger CL; Tielbeek AV; Donkers-van Rossum AB; Cuypers PW; Douwes-Draaijer P; Buth J; van den Bosch HC
    J Vasc Surg; 2005 Oct; 42(4):739-46. PubMed ID: 16242563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the lower extremities: standard-dose vs. high-dose gadodiamide injection.
    Krause U; Kroencke T; Spielhaupter E; Taupitz M; Kenn W; Hamm B; Hahn D
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Apr; 21(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 15778953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MR angiography of the pedal arteries with gadobenate dimeglumine, a contrast agent with increased relaxivity, and comparison with selective intraarterial DSA.
    Kreitner KF; Kunz RP; Herber S; Martenstein S; Dorweiler B; Dueber C
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jan; 27(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 18058929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contrast material-enhanced, moving-table MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography for surveillance of peripheral arterial bypass grafts.
    Loewe C; Cejna M; Schoder M; Loewe-Grgurin M; Wolf F; Lammer J; Thurnher SA
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2003 Sep; 14(9 Pt 1):1129-37. PubMed ID: 14514804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Imaging modalities for renal artery stenosis in suspected renovascular hypertension: prospective intraindividual comparison of color Doppler US, CT angiography, GD-enhanced MR angiography, and digital substraction angiography.
    Rountas C; Vlychou M; Vassiou K; Liakopoulos V; Kapsalaki E; Koukoulis G; Fezoulidis IV; Stefanidis I
    Ren Fail; 2007; 29(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 17497443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feasibility of peripheral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla with a hybrid technique: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
    Berg F; Bangard C; Bovenschulte H; Hellmich M; Nijenhuis M; Lackner K; Gossmann A
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Sep; 43(9):642-9. PubMed ID: 18708858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intra-arterial MR-angiography on an open-bore MR-scanner compared to digital-subtraction angiography of the infra-popliteal runoff in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease.
    Huegli RW; Thalhammer C; Jacob AL; Jaeger K; Bilecen D
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jun; 66(3):519-25. PubMed ID: 17658713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography for evaluation of peripheral arterial occlusive disease: results of a phase III multicenter trial.
    Bui BT; Miller S; Mildenberger P; Sam A; Sheng R;
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jun; 31(6):1402-10. PubMed ID: 20512893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of CE-MRA for the rapid detection of supra-aortic vascular disease.
    Wright VL; Olan W; Dick B; Yu H; Alberts-Grill N; Latour LL; Baird AE
    Neurology; 2005 Jul; 65(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 16009882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography and duplex of the iliac arteries compared with intra-arterial pressure gradient measurements.
    Wikström J; Holmberg A; Johansson L; Löfberg AM; Smedby O; Karacagil S; Ahlström H
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2000 May; 19(5):516-23. PubMed ID: 10828234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High-resolution 3D contrast-enhanced MRA with parallel imaging techniques before endovascular interventional treatment of arterial stenosis.
    Lin J; Li D; Yan F
    Vasc Med; 2009 Nov; 14(4):305-11. PubMed ID: 19808715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.