395 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15056118)
1. Class II restorations in primary teeth: 7-year study on three resin-modified glass ionomer cements and a compomer.
Qvist V; Laurberg L; Poulsen A; Teglers PT
Eur J Oral Sci; 2004 Apr; 112(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 15056118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Resin-modified and conventional glass ionomer restorations in primary teeth: 8-year results.
Qvist V; Manscher E; Teglers PT
J Dent; 2004 May; 32(4):285-94. PubMed ID: 15053911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Eight-year study on conventional glass ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth.
Qvist V; Laurberg L; Poulsen A; Teglers PT
Acta Odontol Scand; 2004 Feb; 62(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 15124781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Longevity and cariostatic effects of everyday conventional glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth: three-year results.
Qvist V; Laurberg L; Poulsen A; Teglers PT
J Dent Res; 1997 Jul; 76(7):1387-96. PubMed ID: 9207772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Retrospective Study of the 3-Year Survival Rate of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Class II Restorations in Primary Molars.
Webman M; Mulki E; Roldan R; Arevalo O; Roberts JF; Garcia-Godoy F
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 26696100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Longevity of posterior restorations in primary teeth: results from a paediatric dental clinic.
Pinto Gdos S; Oliveira LJ; Romano AR; Schardosim LR; Bonow ML; Pacce M; Correa MB; Demarco FF; Torriani DD
J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1248-54. PubMed ID: 25150105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical Evaluation of Restorative Materials in Primary Teeth Class II Lesions.
Sengul F; Gurbuz T
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2015; 39(4):315-21. PubMed ID: 26161601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical performance of aesthetic restorative materials in primary teeth according to the FDI criteria.
Bektas Donmez S; Uysal S; Dolgun A; Turgut MD
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):202-212. PubMed ID: 27759409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.
Ermiş RB
Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Compomers as Class II restorations in primary molars.
Gross LC; Griffen AL; Casamassimo PS
Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 11242726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fluorides leaching from restorative materials and the effect on adjacent teeth.
Qvist V; Poulsen A; Teglers PT; Mjör IA
Int Dent J; 2010 Jun; 60(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 20684440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fracture frequency and longevity of fractured resin composite, polyacid-modified resin composite, and resin-modified glass ionomer cement class IV restorations: an up to 14 years of follow-up.
van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Apr; 14(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 19504133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary teeth. A retrospective evaluation.
Croll TP; Bar-Zion Y; Segura A; Donly KJ
J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Aug; 132(8):1110-6. PubMed ID: 11575018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The marginal seal of a flowable composite, an injectable resin modified glass ionomer and a compomer in primary molars--an in vitro study.
Prabhakar AR; Madan M; Raju OS
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2003 Jun; 21(2):45-8. PubMed ID: 14700335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Randomised trial of resin-based restorations in Class I and Class II beveled preparations in primary molars: 48-month results.
Alves dos Santos MP; Luiz RR; Maia LC
J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):451-9. PubMed ID: 20188783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The longevity of different restorations in primary teeth.
Qvist V; Poulsen A; Teglers PT; Mjör IA
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2010 Jan; 20(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 20059587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.
Casagrande L; Dalpian DM; Ardenghi TM; Zanatta FB; Balbinot CE; García-Godoy F; De Araujo FB
Am J Dent; 2013 Dec; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vitremer restorative cement for children: three clinicians' observations in three pediatric dental practices.
Croll TP; Helpin ML; Donly KJ
ASDC J Dent Child; 2000; 67(6):391-8, 374. PubMed ID: 11204061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and a compomer in restoring non-carious cervical lesions. 5-year results.
Folwaczny M; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 11572293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lack of effect of fluoride releasing resin modified glass ionomer restorations on the contacting surface of adjacent primary molars. a clinical prospective study.
Kotsanos N; Dionysopoulos P
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2004 Sep; 5(3):136-42. PubMed ID: 15471520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
