446 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15056353)
1. A comparison of instrument-centering ability within the root canal for three contemporary instrumentation techniques.
Song YL; Bian Z; Fan B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Peng B
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 15056353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
Tan BT; Messer HH
J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [In vitro comparison of root canal preparation with step-back technique and GT rotary file--a nickel-titanium engine driven rotary instrument system].
Krajczár K; Tóth V; Nyárády Z; Szabó G
Fogorv Sz; 2005 Jun; 98(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 16108416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of different types of automated devices on the shaping ability of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments.
Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):627-36. PubMed ID: 16104976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparative study of hand-held nickel-titanium dental instruments based on the shape of the prepared root canal].
Szabó J; Serbán T; Nagy G; Madléna M; Ipolyi T
Fogorv Sz; 2003 Dec; 96(6):273-6. PubMed ID: 14971265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Canal preparation with Hero 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-file assessed using computed tomography.
Taşdemir T; Aydemir H; Inan U; Unal O
Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):402-8. PubMed ID: 15910476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of cervical preflaring on apical file size determination.
Pecora JD; Capelli A; Guerisoli DM; Spanó JC; Estrela C
Int Endod J; 2005 Jul; 38(7):430-5. PubMed ID: 15946262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of canal centering ability of four instrumentation techniques.
Short JA; Morgan LA; Baumgartner JC
J Endod; 1997 Aug; 23(8):503-7. PubMed ID: 9587320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Study of the progressive changes in canal shape after using different instruments by hand in simulated S-shaped canals.
Ding-ming H; Hong-xia L; Cheung GS; Lan Z; Hong T; Xue-dong Z
J Endod; 2007 Aug; 33(8):986-9. PubMed ID: 17878089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Jodway B; Hülsmann M
Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of tip design of nickel-titanium and stainless steel files on root canal preparation.
Kuhn WG; Carnes DL; Clement DJ; Walker WA
J Endod; 1997 Dec; 23(12):735-8. PubMed ID: 9487848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments and stainless steel hand K-Flexofiles in simulated curved root canals.
Schäfer E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Aug; 92(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 11505270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of curved canal instrumentation using nickel-titanium or stainless steel files with the balanced-force technique.
Harlan AL; Nicholls JI; Steiner JC
J Endod; 1996 Aug; 22(8):410-3. PubMed ID: 8941749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Vlassis M
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of molar root canal preparation using stainless-steel and nickel-titanium instruments.
Carvalho LA; Bonetti I; Borges MA
J Endod; 1999 Dec; 25(12):807-10. PubMed ID: 10726526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of maintaining apical patency on canal transportation.
Tsesis I; Amdor B; Tamse A; Kfir A
Int Endod J; 2008 May; 41(5):431-5. PubMed ID: 18312378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of Ni-Ti versus stainless steel instrumentation in resin simulated canals.
Coleman CL; Svec TA
J Endod; 1997 Apr; 23(4):232-5. PubMed ID: 9594772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of Greater Taper files, ProFiles, and stainless steel files to shape curved root canals.
Park H
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jun; 91(6):715-8. PubMed ID: 11402288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy of rotary instruments with greater taper in preparing oval root canals.
Elayouti A; Chu AL; Kimionis I; Klein C; Weiger R; Löst C
Int Endod J; 2008 Dec; 41(12):1088-92. PubMed ID: 19133098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Shaping ability of two rotary instruments in simulated canals: stainless steel ENDOflash and nickel-titanium HERO Shaper.
Perez F; Schoumacher M; Peli JF
Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):637-44. PubMed ID: 16104977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
