These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15056935)

  • 1. Effect of dominance on heterozygosity and the fixation probability in a subdivided population.
    Nishino J; Tajima F
    Genes Genet Syst; 2004 Feb; 79(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 15056935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Associative overdominance, heterozygosity and fitness.
    Pamilo P; Pálsson S
    Heredity (Edinb); 1998 Oct; 81 ( Pt 4)():381-9. PubMed ID: 9839436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selection in a subdivided population with dominance or local frequency dependence.
    Cherry JL
    Genetics; 2003 Apr; 163(4):1511-8. PubMed ID: 12702693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dying on the way: the influence of migrational mortality on neutral models of spatial variation.
    Nagylaki T
    Theor Popul Biol; 2015 Feb; 99():67-75. PubMed ID: 25450113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fixation probability and time in subdivided populations.
    Whitlock MC
    Genetics; 2003 Jun; 164(2):767-79. PubMed ID: 12807795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selection and drift in subdivided populations: a straightforward method for deriving diffusion approximations and applications involving dominance, selfing and local extinctions.
    Roze D; Rousset F
    Genetics; 2003 Dec; 165(4):2153-66. PubMed ID: 14704194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fixation probability in spatially changing environments.
    Tachida H; Iizuka M
    Genet Res; 1991 Dec; 58(3):243-51. PubMed ID: 1802806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Constraints on the FST-Heterozygosity Outlier Approach.
    Flanagan SP; Jones AG
    J Hered; 2017 Jul; 108(5):561-573. PubMed ID: 28486592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The establishment of underdominant chromosomal rearrangements in multi-deme systems with local extinction and colonization.
    Spirito F; Rizzoni M; Rossi C
    Theor Popul Biol; 1993 Aug; 44(1):80-94. PubMed ID: 8362367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age-specific effect of heterozygosity on survival in alpine marmots, Marmota marmota.
    Cohas A; Bonenfant C; Kempenaers B; Allainé D
    Mol Ecol; 2009 Apr; 18(7):1491-503. PubMed ID: 19298267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of genetic drift on variance components under a general model of epistasis.
    Barton NH; Turelli M
    Evolution; 2004 Oct; 58(10):2111-32. PubMed ID: 15562679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effective population size, genetic diversity, and coalescence time in subdivided populations.
    Nei M; Takahata N
    J Mol Evol; 1993 Sep; 37(3):240-4. PubMed ID: 8230248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The exact values of the probability of fixation of underdominant chromosomal rearrangements.
    Spirito F
    Theor Popul Biol; 1992 Apr; 41(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 1579888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of dominance on the probability of fixation of a mutant allele.
    Chen CT; Chi QS; Sawyer SA
    J Math Biol; 2008 Mar; 56(3):413-34. PubMed ID: 17710402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measuring population differentiation using GST or D? A simulation study with microsatellite DNA markers under a finite island model and nonequilibrium conditions.
    Leng L; Zhang DE
    Mol Ecol; 2011 Jun; 20(12):2494-509. PubMed ID: 21557781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Frequency-dependent selection with dominance: a window onto the behavior of the mean fitness.
    Asmussen MA; Cartwright RA; Spencer HG
    Genetics; 2004 May; 167(1):499-512. PubMed ID: 15166172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of population structure on the amount of polymorphism and the fixation probability under overdominant selection.
    Nishino J; Tajima F
    Genes Genet Syst; 2005 Aug; 80(4):287-95. PubMed ID: 16284422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the survival probabilities of mutant genes and the evolution of dominance.
    Eshel I
    Theor Popul Biol; 1976 Apr; 9(2):282-97. PubMed ID: 1273804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Theoretical study of near neutrality. II. Effect of subdivided population structure with local extinction and recolonization.
    Ohta T
    Genetics; 1992 Apr; 130(4):917-23. PubMed ID: 1582566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence of opposing fitness effects of parental heterozygosity and relatedness in a critically endangered marine turtle?
    Phillips KP; Jorgensen TH; Jolliffe KG; Richardson DS
    J Evol Biol; 2017 Nov; 30(11):1953-1965. PubMed ID: 28787533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.