These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Aggregation of qualitative studies--From theory to practice: Patient priorities and family medicine/general practice evaluations. Reis S; Hermoni D; Van-Raalte R; Dahan R; Borkan JM Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Feb; 65(2):214-22. PubMed ID: 17010557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A practical application of reliability theory to family practice research. Diamond JJ Fam Pract Res J; 1991 Dec; 11(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 1767682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving the rigor of psychophysiology research. Baldwin SA Int J Psychophysiol; 2017 Jan; 111():5-16. PubMed ID: 27133157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Methodological issues in the study of divergent views of the family. Carlton-Ford SL; Paikoff RL; Brooks-Gunn J New Dir Child Dev; 1991; (51):87-102. PubMed ID: 1861778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Methodological ponderings related to the power as knowing participation in change tool. Barrett EA; Caroselli C Nurs Sci Q; 1998; 11(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 9555425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review. Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The family APGAR and psychosocial problems in children: a report from ASPN and PROS. Murphy JM; Kelleher K; Pagano ME; Stulp C; Nutting PA; Jellinek MS; Gardner W; Childs GE J Fam Pract; 1998 Jan; 46(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 9451371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Survey of editors and reviewers of high-impact psychology journals: statistical and research design problems in submitted manuscripts. Harris A; Reeder R; Hyun J J Psychol; 2011; 145(3):195-209. PubMed ID: 21560804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Future directions for family planning operations research: towards a greater appreciation of psychosocial issues. Askew I Adv Popul; 1994; 2():141-69. PubMed ID: 12159234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Designing self-report instruments for family assessment. Halvorsen JG Fam Med; 1990; 22(6):478-84. PubMed ID: 2262112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Introduction to special section of the Journal of Family Psychology, advances in mixed methods in family psychology: integrative and applied solutions for family science. Weisner TS; Fiese BH J Fam Psychol; 2011 Dec; 25(6):795-8. PubMed ID: 22149040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The psychosocial review: evaluating development and implementation in a family practice residency. Jackson MG; Howe GW; Tapp JT Fam Pract Res J; 1986; 6(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 3455108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Studying systematic reviews. Del Mar C; Glasziou P J Fam Pract; 2001 Nov; 50(11):955-7. PubMed ID: 11711011 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The study of client-provider interactions: a review of methodological issues. Simmons R; Elias C Stud Fam Plann; 1994; 25(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 8209391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability of morbidity data in family practice. Anderson JE J Fam Pract; 1980 Apr; 10(4):677-83. PubMed ID: 7365441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]