256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15057689)
1. Methods and Economic Considerations: Group 1 Report. ESGE/UEGF Colorectal Cancer--Public Awareness Campaign. The Public/Professional Interface Workshop: Oslo, Norway, June 20 - 22, 2003. fulfillment corporate.
Steele RJ; Gnauck R; Hrcka R; Kronborg O; Kuntz C; Moayyedi P; O'Morain C; Spicák J; Vainio H
Endoscopy; 2004 Apr; 36(4):349-53. PubMed ID: 15057689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Implementing Colorectal Cancer Screening: Group 2 Report. ESGE/UEGF Colorectal Cancer--Public Awareness Campaign. The Public/Professional Interface Workshop: Oslo, Norway, June 20 - 22, 2003.
Rozen P; Blanchard J; Campbell D; Carlsen E; Lambert R; Marbet U; Peterson K; Regula J; Segnan N; Suchanek S; Van Gossum A
Endoscopy; 2004 Apr; 36(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 15057690
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Public Awareness and Lobbying: Group 3 Report. ESGE/UEGF Colorectal Cancer--Public Awareness Campaign. The Public/Professional Interface Workshop: Oslo, Norway, June 20 - 22, 2003.
Hoff G; Blanchard J; Crespi M; Wood LF; Keighley M; Lamy V; Langmark F; Peterson K; Rey JF; Robertshaw K; Zakaria S
Endoscopy; 2004 Apr; 36(4):359-61. PubMed ID: 15057691
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Legal and Ethical Considerations: Group 4 Report. ESGE/UEGF Colorectal Cancer--Public Awareness Campaign. The Public/Professional Interface Workshop: Oslo, Norway, June 20 - 22, 2003.
Axon AT; Beilenhoff U; James T; Ladas SD; Larsen E; Neumann CS; Nowak A; Schöfl R; Tveit KM
Endoscopy; 2004 Apr; 36(4):362-5. PubMed ID: 15057692
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of endoscopic screening methods.
Brenner H
Z Gastroenterol; 2008 Apr; 46 Suppl 1():S20-2. PubMed ID: 18368634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Screening for colorectal cancer: what fits best?
Lee CS; Ronan L; O'Morain C; McNamara D
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Jun; 6(3):301-12. PubMed ID: 22646253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Screening for colorectal cancer: the light at the end of the tunnel.
Caprilli R; Taddei G
Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 1997 Apr; 29(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 9646188
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness analysis on screening for colorectal neoplasm and management of colorectal cancer in Asia.
Tsoi KK; Ng SS; Leung MC; Sung JJ
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Aug; 28(3):353-63. PubMed ID: 18638075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Screening and surveillance for colorectal cancer.
Schnoll-Sussman F; Markowitz AJ; Winawer SJ
Semin Oncol; 2000 Oct; 27(5 Suppl 10):10-21. PubMed ID: 11049028
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. What is the most cost-effective screening regimen for colon cancer?
Griffith S; Kane KY
J Fam Pract; 2001 Jan; 50(1):13. PubMed ID: 11195472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Summaries for patients. Is aspirin a cost-effective addition to colorectal cancer screening?
Ann Intern Med; 2001 Nov; 135(9):1. PubMed ID: 11759636
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening strategies in Singapore: a dynamic decision analytic approach.
Wong SS; Leong AP; Leong TY
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 1):104-10. PubMed ID: 15360784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Screening for colorectal cancer: which test can we afford?
Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; van Ballegooijen M; Kuipers EJ
Z Gastroenterol; 2008 Apr; 46 Suppl 1():S38-40. PubMed ID: 18368641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Is screening of colorectal cancer by endoscopy economically profitable?].
Santavirta J
Duodecim; 2001; 117(12):1240-4. PubMed ID: 12183926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Colorectal cancer. Which test is best?
Cahill BA
Adv Nurse Pract; 2005 Jan; 13(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 15679298
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening for colon cancer: economics and related considerations.
Gelfand DW
Semin Roentgenol; 1996 Apr; 31(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 8848734
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Colorectal cancer screening is profitable].
Pikkarainen P
Duodecim; 1999; 115(17):1813-4. PubMed ID: 11941648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A literature review of assumptions on test characteristics and adherence in economic evaluations of colonoscopy and CT-colonography screening.
van Gils P; van den Berg M; van Kranen H; de Wit AG
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Jun; 45(9):1554-9. PubMed ID: 19261464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening for colorectal cancer.
Brown ML
N Engl J Med; 1993 Oct; 329(18):1352-3. PubMed ID: 8292163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Judging the guidelines for colorectal cancer screening.
Woolf SH; Ganiats TG
Am Fam Physician; 1997 Jun; 55(8):2595, 2598-600. PubMed ID: 9191445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
