218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15058180)
1. Short-term retention properties of cements for retrievable implant-supported prostheses.
Alfaro MA; Papazoglou E; McGlumphy EA; Holloway JA
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2004 Mar; 12(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 15058180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of uniaxial resistance forces of cements used with implant-supported crowns.
Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H; Cehreli MC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):536-42. PubMed ID: 12182296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retention of cast crown copings cemented to implant abutments.
Dudley JE; Richards LC; Abbott JR
Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 19133949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
Bernal G; Okamura M; Muñoz CA
J Prosthodont; 2003 Jun; 12(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 12964683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of thermal cycling and air abrasion on cement failure loads of 4 provisional luting agents used for the cementation of implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
Michalakis K; Pissiotis AL; Kang K; Hirayama H; Garefis PD; Petridis H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):569-74. PubMed ID: 17929517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An in vitro assessment of circumferential grooves on the retention of cement-retained implant-supported crowns.
Lewinstein I; Block L; Lehr Z; Ormianer Z; Matalon S
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Dec; 106(6):367-72. PubMed ID: 22133393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of 3 luting agents on retention of implant-supported crowns on 2 different abutments.
Güncü MB; Cakan U; Canay S
Implant Dent; 2011 Oct; 20(5):349-53. PubMed ID: 21811170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retentiveness of dental cements used with metallic implant components.
Squier RS; Agar JR; Duncan JP; Taylor TD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(6):793-8. PubMed ID: 11769829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cementable implant crowns composed of cast superstructure frameworks luted to electroformed primary copings: an in vitro retention study.
Di Felice R; Rappelli G; Camaioni E; Cattani M; Meyer JM; Belser UC
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Feb; 18(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 17224031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents.
Cano-Batalla J; Soliva-Garriga J; Campillo-Funollet M; Munoz-Viveros CA; Giner-Tarrida L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22299076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of fatigue damage on the force required to remove a restoration in a cement-retained implant system.
Kaar D; Oshida Y; Andres CJ; Barco MT; Platt JA
J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(5):289-94. PubMed ID: 16958729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro retentive strength of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns using different luting agents.
Ernst CP; Cohnen U; Stender E; Willershausen B
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):551-8. PubMed ID: 15942616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of an occlusal screw-access hole on the fracture resistance of permanently cemented implant crowns: a laboratory study.
Shadid RM; Abu-Naba'a L; Al-Omari WM; Asfar KR; El Masoud BM
Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(3):267-9. PubMed ID: 21519576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of die spacer on retention and fitting of complete cast crowns.
Olivera AB; Saito T
J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 16827737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of screw access on the retention of cement-retained implant prostheses.
da Rocha PV; Freitas MA; de Morais Alves da Cunha T
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):264-8. PubMed ID: 23566608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Effect of Compressive Cyclic Loading on the Retention of Cast Single Crowns Cemented to Implant Abutments.
Alvarez-Arenal A; Gonzalez-Gonzalez I; Pinés-Hueso J; deLlanos-Lanchares H; del Rio Highsmith J
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(1):80-2. PubMed ID: 26757336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of surface topography of implant abutments on retention of cemented single-tooth crowns.
de Campos TN; Adachi LK; Miashiro K; Yoshida H; Shinkai RS; Neto PT; Frigerio ML
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2010 Aug; 30(4):409-13. PubMed ID: 20664843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of two fit-indicating materials and various subsequent cleaning methods on the retention of simulated crowns.
Hammad IA; Al Amri M
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 18182185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
