218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15058180)
21. Dimensional accuracy and retentive strength of a retrievable cement-retained implant-supported prosthesis.
Randi AP; Hsu AT; Verga A; Kim JJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(4):547-56. PubMed ID: 11516002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effects of a cementing technique in addition to luting agent on the uniaxial retention force of a single-tooth implant-supported restoration: an in vitro study.
Santosa RE; Martin W; Morton D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1145-52. PubMed ID: 21197491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The effects of abutment wall height, platform size, and screw access channel filling method on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
Emms M; Tredwin CJ; Setchell DJ; Moles DR
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 17244301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Fracture resistance of implant-supported screw- versus cement-retained porcelain fused to metal single crowns: SEM fractographic analysis.
Zarone F; Sorrentino R; Traini T; Di lorio D; Caputi S
Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 16564081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cement failure loads of 4 provisional luting agents used for the cementation of implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
Michalakis KX; Pissiotis AL; Hirayama H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(4):545-9. PubMed ID: 10960988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Strength of CAD/CAM-generated esthetic ceramic molar implant crowns.
Wolf D; Bindl A; Schmidlin PR; Lüthy H; Mörmann WH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):609-17. PubMed ID: 18807555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of two axial wall height preparations on the retentive properties of full crowns using three different cements.
Martins-Pinto MG; Pisani-Proenca J; Erhardt MC; Spielmann C; Del Castillo-Salmeron R; Lopes LA
Gen Dent; 2008; 56(6):569-73; quiz 574-5, 591-2. PubMed ID: 18810919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Marginal fit of cemented and screw-retained crowns incorporated on the Straumann (ITI) Dental Implant System: an in vitro study.
Tosches NA; Brägger U; Lang NP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jan; 20(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 19126111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effects of thermocycling on the retention of various cements of one-unit and three-unit fixed implant-supported restorations.
Uludamar A; Ozkan Y; Ozkan YK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):567-76. PubMed ID: 22616050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Retrievability of implant-retained crowns following cementation.
Mehl C; Harder S; Wolfart M; Kern M; Wolfart S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1304-11. PubMed ID: 19040447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of Preseating, Screw Access Opening, and Vent Holes on Extrusion of Excess Cement at the Crown-Abutment Margin and Associated Tensile Force for Cement-Retained Implant Restorations.
Jimenez RA; Vargas-Koudriavtsev T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):807-12. PubMed ID: 27447146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. In vitro influence of ultrasonic stress, removal force preload and thermocycling on the retrievability of implant-retained crowns.
Mehl C; Harder S; Schwarz D; Steiner M; Vollrath O; Kern M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Aug; 23(8):930-7. PubMed ID: 21722192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The effect of engaging the screw access channel of an implant abutment with a cement-retained restoration.
Naik S; Tredwin CJ; Nesbit M; Setchell DJ; Moles DR
J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 19141047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Retention of gold alloy crowns cemented with traditional and resin cements.
Pinzón LM; Frey GN; Winkler MM; Tate WH; Burgess JO; Powers JM
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):351-3. PubMed ID: 19639070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Retention forces and seating discrepancies of implant-retained castings after cementation.
Wolfart M; Wolfart S; Kern M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(4):519-25. PubMed ID: 16955601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Tensile bond strength of cast commercially pure titanium and cast gold-alloy posts and cores cemented with two luting agents.
Menani LR; Ribeiro RF; Antunes RP
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 18262015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A crown venting technique for the cementation of implant-supported crowns.
Schwedhelm ER; Lepe X; Aw TC
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):89-90. PubMed ID: 12589295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. What's your choice: cement- or screw-retained implant restorations?
Strong SM
Gen Dent; 2008; 56(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 18254555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of 7 luting protocols and their effect on the retention and marginal leakage of a cement-retained dental implant restoration.
Pan YH; Ramp LC; Lin CK; Liu PR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(4):587-92. PubMed ID: 16955610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of two luting agents used for the retention of cast dowel and cores.
Habib B; von Fraunhofer JA; Driscoll CF
J Prosthodont; 2005 Sep; 14(3):164-9. PubMed ID: 16336233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
