These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15058180)

  • 41. Fracture resistance of single-tooth implant-supported all-ceramic restorations: an in vitro study.
    Att W; Kurun S; Gerds T; Strub JR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 16473084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Is There a Correlation Between Tensile Strength and Retrievability of Cemented Implant-Retained Crowns Using Artificial Aging?
    Mehl C; Ali S; El Bahra S; Harder S; Vollrath O; Kern M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 26757337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. In vitro stress analyses of dental implants supporting screw-retained and cement-retained prostheses.
    Kim WD; Jacobson Z; Nathanson D
    Implant Dent; 1999; 8(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 10635156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Retention force of secondary crowns to copings after temporary cementation: the effect of crown material and luting agent.
    Mundt T; Heinemann F; Golecki G; Schwahn C; Biffar R
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2010 Dec; 55(6):335-40. PubMed ID: 20961184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns.
    Attia A; Abdelaziz KM; Freitag S; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 16473085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Retention of four endodontic posts cemented with composite resin.
    Cohen BI; Pagnillo MK; Newman I; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(3):320-4. PubMed ID: 11199599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. In vitro vertical misfit evaluation of cast frameworks for cement-retained implant-supported partial prostheses.
    Oyagüe RC; Turrión AS; Toledano M; Monticelli F; Osorio R
    J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 18951675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Cemented Single Crown Retention on Dental Implants: An In Vitro Study.
    Rues S; Fugina M; Rammelsberg P; Kappel S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2017; 30(2):133-135. PubMed ID: 28267819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effect of Surface Modifications on the Retention of Implant-supported Cement-retained Crowns with Short Abutments: An
    Kalla K; Arunachalam S; Behera SSP; Konchada J; Lankapalli S; Vanisetti L
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Dec; 22(12):1451-1456. PubMed ID: 35656686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Cemented or screw-retained implant restorations: how do you decide?
    Small BW
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 21613034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effect of implant abutment modification on the extrusion of excess cement at the crown-abutment margin for cement-retained implant restorations.
    Wadhwani C; Piñeyro A; Hess T; Zhang H; Chung KH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1241-6. PubMed ID: 22167429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The effect of luting agents on the retention of dental implant-supported crowns.
    Pan YH; Lin CK
    Chang Gung Med J; 2005 Jun; 28(6):403-10. PubMed ID: 16124156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Retrievable cemented crown options on implant-supported angled abutments: a case report.
    Ganor Y; Indig B; Gross M
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Oct; 27(10):679-84. PubMed ID: 9180404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Retention and leakage of implant-supported restorations luted with provisional cement: a pilot study.
    Pan YH; Ramp LC; Lin CK; Liu PR
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Mar; 34(3):206-12. PubMed ID: 17302949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The effect of compressive cyclic loading on retention of a temporary cement used with implants.
    Ongthiemsak C; Mekayarajjananonth T; Winkler S; Boberick KG
    J Oral Implantol; 2005; 31(3):115-20. PubMed ID: 16001684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effects of vertical interarch space and abutment height on stress distributions: a 3D finite element analysis.
    Naveau A; Renault P; Pierrisnard L
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2009 Jun; 17(2):90-4. PubMed ID: 19645311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported single-tooth crowns: a 4-year prospective clinical study.
    Vigolo P; Givani A; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):260-5. PubMed ID: 15101598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Screw- versus cement-retained implant restorations: current concepts.
    Lee A; Okayasu K; Wang HL
    Implant Dent; 2010 Feb; 19(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 20147811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The effect of different surface treatments on cement-retained implant-supported restorations.
    Kurt M; Külünk T; Ural C; Külünk Ş; Danişman Ş; Savaş S
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Feb; 39(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 21142787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Retention and marginal leakage of provisional crowns cemented with provisional cements enriched with chlorhexidine diacetate.
    Lewinstein I; Chweidan H; Matalon S; Pilo R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Nov; 98(5):373-8. PubMed ID: 18021826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.