180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1505825)
1. [Significance of mass screening for early detection of cervical cancer in Israel].
Bornstein J; Abramovici H
Harefuah; 1992 Jun; 122(12):776-80. PubMed ID: 1505825
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening for cervical cancer in Brazil.
Naud P; Busetti M; Becker E; Camozzato A; Siegler R; Cavagnoli J; Machado E; Bender Lima G; Timm AR
Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1996 Dec; 30(4):391-4. PubMed ID: 9041751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [The value of screening using cervicography in dysplasia and neoplasms of the uterine cervix].
Coibion M; Guenier C; Miloiu A; Andry M; Bonnal JL; Nogaret JM
Rev Med Brux; 1990; 11(1-2):16-20. PubMed ID: 2406832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The case against cytological mass screening for cervical cancer in Israel].
Menczer J
Harefuah; 1992 Jun; 122(12):802-4. PubMed ID: 1505832
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [A national population-based screening program for cervical cancer in Israel, need for re-evaluation].
Benshushan A; Antebi SO
Harefuah; 2000 Sep; 139(5-6):217-20. PubMed ID: 11062956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Pap smear.
Colyar MR
Adv Nurse Pract; 2002 Jul; 10(7):22. PubMed ID: 12420546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Interobserver agreement in the diagnosis of cervical smears.
Kashyap V; Murthy NS; Bhatnagar P; Sharma S; Das DK
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 1995 Oct; 38(4):375-82. PubMed ID: 9726147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Diagnosis of cervical dysplasias].
Pérez Dettoma J; Santamaría M; Jurado M; Cabezón C; Domínquez J; de la Fuente F; López García G
Rev Med Univ Navarra; 1980 Dec; 24(4):26-9. PubMed ID: 7336009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Secondary prevention of cervical cancer part 1: screening for cervical cancer and its precursors.
Boisen M; Diedrich JT; Lonky NM; Guido R
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jun; 57(2):279-91. PubMed ID: 24785416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The diagnostic value of computer-assisted primary cervical smear screening: a longitudinal cohort study.
Doornewaard H; van der Schouw YT; van der Graaf Y; Bos AB; Habbema JD; van den Tweel JG
Mod Pathol; 1999 Nov; 12(11):995-1000. PubMed ID: 10574595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of the efficiency of diagnosis of early cervical carcinoma by general practitioners and cytology screening programs in the Netherlands.
Kirk RS; Boon ME
Acta Cytol; 1981; 25(3):259-62. PubMed ID: 6942616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Translational approaches to improving cervical screening.
Baldwin P; Laskey R; Coleman N
Nat Rev Cancer; 2003 Mar; 3(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 12612656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after Pap smears: the protective effect of multiple negatives.
Coldman A; Phillips N; Kan L; Matisic J; Benedet L; Towers L
J Med Screen; 2005; 12(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 15814014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost effectiveness of population screening and rescreening for cervical cancer in the Netherlands.
Boon ME; de Graaff Guilloud JC
Acta Cytol; 1981; 25(5):539-42. PubMed ID: 6792845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Diagnostic accuracy of colposcopy in the detection of precancerous conditions and early forms of cervical cancer].
Hanuszek K
Pol Tyg Lek; 1980 Oct; 35(40):1521-4. PubMed ID: 7465446
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [The effect of various factors on participation in cytologic screening in the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer].
Kavungu P; Ebeling K; Ebert S
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1983; 77(21):883-5. PubMed ID: 6659584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Additional results on relative protection of cervical cancer screening according to stage of tumour from the Geneva case-control study.
Raymond L; Obradovic M; Riotton G
IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):107-10. PubMed ID: 3570397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Current methods of active detection of cervical cancer].
Vinokur ML; Popova AA
Sov Med; 1984; (10):99-103. PubMed ID: 6515462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical cancer screening data from two cohorts in British Columbia.
van Oortmarssen GJ; Habbema JD
IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):47-60. PubMed ID: 3570415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical cancer screening in medically underserved California Latina and non-Latina women: effect of age and regularity of Pap testing.
Howell LP; Gurusinghe S; Tabnak F; Sciortino S
Cancer Detect Prev; 2009; 32(5-6):372-9. PubMed ID: 19264426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
