These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1505825)

  • 1. [Significance of mass screening for early detection of cervical cancer in Israel].
    Bornstein J; Abramovici H
    Harefuah; 1992 Jun; 122(12):776-80. PubMed ID: 1505825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Screening for cervical cancer in Brazil.
    Naud P; Busetti M; Becker E; Camozzato A; Siegler R; Cavagnoli J; Machado E; Bender Lima G; Timm AR
    Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1996 Dec; 30(4):391-4. PubMed ID: 9041751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The value of screening using cervicography in dysplasia and neoplasms of the uterine cervix].
    Coibion M; Guenier C; Miloiu A; Andry M; Bonnal JL; Nogaret JM
    Rev Med Brux; 1990; 11(1-2):16-20. PubMed ID: 2406832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The case against cytological mass screening for cervical cancer in Israel].
    Menczer J
    Harefuah; 1992 Jun; 122(12):802-4. PubMed ID: 1505832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [A national population-based screening program for cervical cancer in Israel, need for re-evaluation].
    Benshushan A; Antebi SO
    Harefuah; 2000 Sep; 139(5-6):217-20. PubMed ID: 11062956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Pap smear.
    Colyar MR
    Adv Nurse Pract; 2002 Jul; 10(7):22. PubMed ID: 12420546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interobserver agreement in the diagnosis of cervical smears.
    Kashyap V; Murthy NS; Bhatnagar P; Sharma S; Das DK
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 1995 Oct; 38(4):375-82. PubMed ID: 9726147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Diagnosis of cervical dysplasias].
    Pérez Dettoma J; Santamaría M; Jurado M; Cabezón C; Domínquez J; de la Fuente F; López García G
    Rev Med Univ Navarra; 1980 Dec; 24(4):26-9. PubMed ID: 7336009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Secondary prevention of cervical cancer part 1: screening for cervical cancer and its precursors.
    Boisen M; Diedrich JT; Lonky NM; Guido R
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jun; 57(2):279-91. PubMed ID: 24785416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The diagnostic value of computer-assisted primary cervical smear screening: a longitudinal cohort study.
    Doornewaard H; van der Schouw YT; van der Graaf Y; Bos AB; Habbema JD; van den Tweel JG
    Mod Pathol; 1999 Nov; 12(11):995-1000. PubMed ID: 10574595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of the efficiency of diagnosis of early cervical carcinoma by general practitioners and cytology screening programs in the Netherlands.
    Kirk RS; Boon ME
    Acta Cytol; 1981; 25(3):259-62. PubMed ID: 6942616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Translational approaches to improving cervical screening.
    Baldwin P; Laskey R; Coleman N
    Nat Rev Cancer; 2003 Mar; 3(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 12612656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after Pap smears: the protective effect of multiple negatives.
    Coldman A; Phillips N; Kan L; Matisic J; Benedet L; Towers L
    J Med Screen; 2005; 12(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 15814014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost effectiveness of population screening and rescreening for cervical cancer in the Netherlands.
    Boon ME; de Graaff Guilloud JC
    Acta Cytol; 1981; 25(5):539-42. PubMed ID: 6792845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Diagnostic accuracy of colposcopy in the detection of precancerous conditions and early forms of cervical cancer].
    Hanuszek K
    Pol Tyg Lek; 1980 Oct; 35(40):1521-4. PubMed ID: 7465446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The effect of various factors on participation in cytologic screening in the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer].
    Kavungu P; Ebeling K; Ebert S
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1983; 77(21):883-5. PubMed ID: 6659584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Additional results on relative protection of cervical cancer screening according to stage of tumour from the Geneva case-control study.
    Raymond L; Obradovic M; Riotton G
    IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):107-10. PubMed ID: 3570397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Current methods of active detection of cervical cancer].
    Vinokur ML; Popova AA
    Sov Med; 1984; (10):99-103. PubMed ID: 6515462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cervical cancer screening data from two cohorts in British Columbia.
    van Oortmarssen GJ; Habbema JD
    IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):47-60. PubMed ID: 3570415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cervical cancer screening in medically underserved California Latina and non-Latina women: effect of age and regularity of Pap testing.
    Howell LP; Gurusinghe S; Tabnak F; Sciortino S
    Cancer Detect Prev; 2009; 32(5-6):372-9. PubMed ID: 19264426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.