These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15058353)

  • 21. Preparation of stimuli for timbre perception studies.
    Labuschagne IB; Hanekom JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2256-67. PubMed ID: 23967955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An effect of temporal asymmetry on loudness.
    Stecker GC; Hafter ER
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jun; 107(6):3358-68. PubMed ID: 10875381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Brightness scaling of periodic tones.
    Almeida A; Schubert E; Smith J; Wolfe J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):1892-1896. PubMed ID: 28752284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Spectral pattern, harmonic relations, and the perceptual grouping of low-numbered components.
    Roberts B; Brunstrom JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2118-34. PubMed ID: 14587610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The representation of periodic sounds in simulated sustained chopper units of the ventral cochlear nucleus.
    Wiegrebe L; Meddis R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Mar; 115(3):1207-18. PubMed ID: 15058342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Music perception, pitch, and the auditory system.
    McDermott JH; Oxenham AJ
    Curr Opin Neurobiol; 2008 Aug; 18(4):452-63. PubMed ID: 18824100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Individual differences in source identification from synthesized impact sounds.
    Lutfi RA; Liu CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1017-28. PubMed ID: 17672650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Harmonic fusion and pitch affinity: Is there a direct link?
    Bonnard D; Dauman R; Semal C; Demany L
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():247-254. PubMed ID: 26341475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Auditory spaciousness: some further psychoacoustic analyses.
    Blauert J; Lindemann W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Aug; 80(2):533-42. PubMed ID: 3745685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of signal envelope on the pitch of short sinusoidal tones.
    Rossing TD; Houtsma AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Jun; 79(6):1926-33. PubMed ID: 3722602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Timbre Toolbox: extracting audio descriptors from musical signals.
    Peeters G; Giordano BL; Susini P; Misdariis N; McAdams S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2902-16. PubMed ID: 22087919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effects of spectral and temporal parameters on perceived confirmation of an auditory non-speech signal.
    Bodendörfer X; Kortekaas R; Weingarten M; Schlittmeier S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Aug; 138(2):EL127-32. PubMed ID: 26328737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech.
    Ananthakrishnan S; Luo X; Krishnan A
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e256-e267. PubMed ID: 28362674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Interactive processing of timbre dimensions: a Garner interference study.
    Caclin A; Giard MH; Smith BK; McAdams S
    Brain Res; 2007 Mar; 1138():159-70. PubMed ID: 17261274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The relationship between the cross-correlation coefficient of two-channel acoustic signals and sound image quality.
    Kurozumi K; Ohgushi K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Dec; 74(6):1726-33. PubMed ID: 6655130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Technological, biological, and acoustical constraints to music perception in cochlear implant users.
    Limb CJ; Roy AT
    Hear Res; 2014 Feb; 308():13-26. PubMed ID: 23665130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Perceptual differences between vowels located in a limited phonetic space.
    Kewley-Port D; Atal BS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Apr; 85(4):1726-40. PubMed ID: 2708689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Perceptual and emotional categorization of sound.
    Bergman P; Sköld A; Västfjäll D; Fransson N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3156-67. PubMed ID: 20000929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Music to electric ears: pitch and timbre perception by cochlear implant patients.
    Pressnitzer D; Bestel J; Fraysse B
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2005 Dec; 1060():343-5. PubMed ID: 16597784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.