153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15058354)
1. On the use of the derivative of electroglottographic signals for characterization of nonpathological phonation.
Henrich N; d'Alessandro C; Doval B; Castellengo M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Mar; 115(3):1321-32. PubMed ID: 15058354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Glottal open quotient in singing: measurements and correlation with laryngeal mechanisms, vocal intensity, and fundamental frequency.
Henrich N; D'Alessandro C; Doval B; Castellengo M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Mar; 117(3 Pt 1):1417-30. PubMed ID: 15807029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing closed quotient in children singers' voices as measured by high-speed-imaging, electroglottography, and inverse filtering.
Mecke AC; Sundberg J; Granqvist S; Echternach M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):435-41. PubMed ID: 22280605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using electroglottographic real-time feedback to control posterior glottal adduction during phonation.
Herbst CT; Howard D; Schlömicher-Thier J
J Voice; 2010 Jan; 24(1):72-85. PubMed ID: 19185453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of resonance tubes on glottal contact quotient with and without task instruction: a comparison of trained and untrained voices.
Gaskill CS; Quinney DM
J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):e79-93. PubMed ID: 21550779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Glottal volume velocity waveform characteristics in subjects with and without vocal training, related to gender, sound intensity, fundamental frequency, and age.
Sulter AM; Wit HP
J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Nov; 100(5):3360-73. PubMed ID: 8914317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Vowel effect on glottal parameters and the magnitude of jaw opening.
Lim M; Lin E; Bones P
J Voice; 2006 Mar; 20(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 15941648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Parameterization of the glottal area, glottal flow, and vocal fold contact area.
Titze IR
J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Feb; 75(2):570-80. PubMed ID: 6699296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Phonation threshold pressure: a missing link in glottal aerodynamics.
Titze IR
J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 May; 91(5):2926-35. PubMed ID: 1629485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Glottal opening and closing events investigated by electroglottography and super-high-speed video recordings.
Herbst CT; Lohscheller J; Švec JG; Henrich N; Weissengruber G; Fitch WT
J Exp Biol; 2014 Mar; 217(Pt 6):955-63. PubMed ID: 24622896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensitivity of odd-harmonic amplitudes to open quotient and skewing quotient in glottal airflow.
Titze IR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jan; 137(1):502-4. PubMed ID: 25618080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Normalized amplitude quotient for parametrization of the glottal flow.
Alku P; Bäckström T; Vilkman E
J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Aug; 112(2):701-10. PubMed ID: 12186049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Vocal intensity in speakers and singers.
Titze IR; Sundberg J
J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 May; 91(5):2936-46. PubMed ID: 1629486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Approximations of open quotient and speed quotient from glottal airflow and EGG waveforms: effects of measurement criteria and sound pressure level.
Sapienza CM; Stathopoulos ET; Dromey C
J Voice; 1998 Mar; 12(1):31-43. PubMed ID: 9619977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of different methods to measure the EGG contact quotient.
Herbst C; Ternström S
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2006; 31(3):126-38. PubMed ID: 16966155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of an artificially lengthened vocal tract on estimated glottal contact quotient in untrained male voices.
Gaskill CS; Erickson ML
J Voice; 2010 Jan; 24(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 19135851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Variability of electroglottographic glottal closed quotients: necessity of standardization to obtain normative values.
Kania RE; Hans S; Hartl DM; Clement P; Crevier-Buchman L; Brasnu DF
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 Mar; 130(3):349-52. PubMed ID: 15023846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Skewing of the glottal flow with respect to the glottal area measured in natural production of vowels.
Alku P; Murtola T; Malinen J; Geneid A; Vilkman E
J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Oct; 146(4):2501. PubMed ID: 31671985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Electroglottographic evaluation of gender and vowel effects during modal and vocal fry phonation.
Chen Y; Robb MP; Gilbert HR
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Oct; 45(5):821-9. PubMed ID: 12381041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of gender on measures of electroglottographic contact quotient.
Awan SN; Awan JA
J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):433-40. PubMed ID: 23809567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
