These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15059160)

  • 1. Vacuum extraction: is there any need to improve the current training in the UK?
    Sau A; Sau M; Ahmed H; Brown R
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2004 May; 83(5):466-70. PubMed ID: 15059160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vacuum cup placement during delivery--a suggested obstetric quality assessment measure.
    Haikin EH; Mankuta D
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Oct; 25(10):2135-7. PubMed ID: 22533712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Learning curve of vacuum extraction in residency: a preliminary study].
    Velemir L; Vendittelli F; Bonnefoy C; Accoceberry M; Savary D; Gallot D
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2009 Sep; 38(5):421-9. PubMed ID: 19467807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fear of failure: are we doing too many trials of instrumental delivery in theatre?
    Ebulue V; Vadalkar J; Cely S; Dopwell F; Yoong W
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(11):1234-8. PubMed ID: 19016358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A randomised controlled trial of a new handheld vacuum extraction device.
    Attilakos G; Sibanda T; Winter C; Johnson N; Draycott T
    BJOG; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1510-5. PubMed ID: 16225571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of vacuum extraction delivery between the conventional metal cup and the new soft rubber cup.
    Srisomboon J; Piyamongkol W; Sahapong V; Mongkolchaipak S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1998 Jul; 81(7):480-6. PubMed ID: 9676083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A prospective randomised controlled trial of the Kiwi Omnicup versus conventional ventouse cups for vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery.
    Groom KM; Jones BA; Miller N; Paterson-Brown S
    BJOG; 2006 Feb; 113(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 16411996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Monitoring obstetricians' performance with statistical process control charts.
    Lane S; Weeks A; Scholefield H; Alfirevic Z
    BJOG; 2007 May; 114(5):614-8. PubMed ID: 17355271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comparative study of two single-use vacuum extractor].
    Bothuyne-Queste E; Deruelle P; Closset E; Depret S; Subtil D
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2009 Apr; 38(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 19095377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Dual chamber safety vacuum--initial experiences with a new suction cup].
    Korell M; King S; Hepp H
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1994 Jun; 54(6):367-71. PubMed ID: 8088493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of artificial caput on performance of vacuum extractors.
    Muise KL; Duchon MA; Brown RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Feb; 81(2):170-3. PubMed ID: 8423942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What happens when vacuum extraction fails?
    Melamed N; Yogev Y; Stainmetz S; Ben-Haroush A
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Aug; 280(2):243-8. PubMed ID: 19116724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neonatal complications of vacuum-assisted delivery.
    Simonson C; Barlow P; Dehennin N; Sphel M; Toppet V; Murillo D; Rozenberg S
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Mar; 109(3):626-33. PubMed ID: 17329513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of "instrument-associated" and "spontaneous" obstetric depressed skull fractures in a cohort of 68 neonates.
    Dupuis O; Silveira R; Dupont C; Mottolese C; Kahn P; Dittmar A; Rudigoz RC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jan; 192(1):165-70. PubMed ID: 15672020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Qualitative analysis by interviews and video recordings to establish the components of a skilled low-cavity non-rotational vacuum delivery.
    Bahl R; Murphy DJ; Strachan B
    BJOG; 2009 Jan; 116(2):319-26. PubMed ID: 19076964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Operative vaginal delivery: a comparison of forceps and vacuum for success rate and risk of rectal sphincter injury.
    Damron DP; Capeless EL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Sep; 191(3):907-10. PubMed ID: 15467563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Caesarean section with vacuum extraction of the head].
    Dimitrov A; Pavlova E; Krŭsteva K; Nikolov A
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2008; 47(3):3-6. PubMed ID: 18756824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Decision-to-delivery interval for instrumental vaginal deliveries: vacuum extraction versus forceps.
    Lurie S; Glezerman M; Baider C; Sadan O
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2006 Apr; 274(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 16408184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outcomes after vacuum-assisted deliveries. Births attended by community family practitioners.
    Yarrow C; Benoit G; Klein MC
    Can Fam Physician; 2004 Aug; 50():1109-14. PubMed ID: 15455810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Head injuries after instrumental vaginal deliveries.
    Doumouchtsis SK; Arulkumaran S
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 18(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 16601472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.