1169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15059174)
1. Evaluation of modifications of the traditional patch test in assessing the chemical irritation potential of feminine hygiene products.
Farage MA; Meyer S; Walter D
Skin Res Technol; 2004 May; 10(2):73-84. PubMed ID: 15059174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of a sensitive test method to evaluate mechanical irritation potential on mucosal skin.
Farage MA; Meyer S; Walter D
Skin Res Technol; 2004 May; 10(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 15059175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Behind-the-Knee test: an efficient model for evaluating mechanical and chemical irritation.
Farage MA
Skin Res Technol; 2006 May; 12(2):73-82. PubMed ID: 16626379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cumulative skin irritation test of sanitary pads in sensitive skin and normal skin population.
Farage MA; Maibach H
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2007; 26(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17464747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The vulvar epithelium differs from the skin: implications for cutaneous testing to address topical vulvar exposures.
Farage M; Maibach HI
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Oct; 51(4):201-9. PubMed ID: 15500670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative assessment of the acute skin irritation potential of detergent formulations using a novel human 4-h patch test method.
Robinson MK; Kruszewski FH; Al-Atrash J; Blazka ME; Gingell R; Heitfeld FA; Mallon D; Snyder NK; Swanson JE; Casterton PL
Food Chem Toxicol; 2005 Dec; 43(12):1703-12. PubMed ID: 16026914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dermatological testing of an emollient-treated menstrual pad with a novel foam absorbent core.
Farage MA; Segarra VS; Bramante M; Elsner P; Maibach HI
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2008; 27(4):333-43. PubMed ID: 19037765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The study of human skin irritation of a novel herbal skin care product and ingredients by human single closed patch testing.
Wattanakrai P; Suwanachote S; Kulkollakarn S; Rajatanavin N
J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Jun; 90(6):1116-22. PubMed ID: 17624205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Human scalp irritation compared to that of the arm and back.
Zhai H; Fautz R; Fuchs A; Bhandarkar S; Maibach HI
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Oct; 51(4):196-200. PubMed ID: 15500669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the dermal compatibility of a new female incontinence product line.
Gutshall D; Zhou S; Wang B; Farage MA; Hochwalt AE
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2016 Dec; 35(4):287-95. PubMed ID: 26621074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Enhancement of visual scoring of skin irritant reactions using cross-polarized light and parallel-polarized light.
Farage MA
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Mar; 58(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 18279152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Final report on the safety assessment of capsicum annuum extract, capsicum annuum fruit extract, capsicum annuum resin, capsicum annuum fruit powder, capsicum frutescens fruit, capsicum frutescens fruit extract, capsicum frutescens resin, and capsaicin.
Int J Toxicol; 2007; 26 Suppl 1():3-106. PubMed ID: 17365137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of usage practices, ethnicity and climate on the skin compatibility of sanitary pads.
Farage M; Elsner P; Maibach H
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Jun; 275(6):415-27. PubMed ID: 17514373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of a measure of acute irritation to predict the outcome of repeated usage of hand soap products.
Williams C; Wilkinson M; McShane P; Pennington D; Fernandez C; Pierce S
Br J Dermatol; 2011 Jun; 164(6):1311-5. PubMed ID: 21332456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating lotion transfer from products to skin using the behind-the-knee test.
Farage MA
Skin Res Technol; 2010 May; 16(2):243-52. PubMed ID: 20456105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sanitary napkin contact dermatitis of the vulva: location-dependent differences in skin surface conditions may play a role in negative patch test results.
Wakashin K
J Dermatol; 2007 Dec; 34(12):834-7. PubMed ID: 18078410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Determination of skin irritation potential in the human 4-h patch test.
Basketter DA; York M; McFadden JP; Robinson MK
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jul; 51(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 15291823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are we reaching the limits or our ability to detect skin effects with our current testing and measuring methods for consumer products?
Farage MA
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Jun; 52(6):297-303. PubMed ID: 15932577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Amended final report on the safety assessment of glyceryl dilaurate, glyceryl diarachidate, glyceryl dibehenate, glyceryl dierucate, glyceryl dihydroxystearate, glyceryl diisopalmitate, glyceryl diisostearate, glyceryl dilinoleate, glyceryl dimyristate, glyceryl dioleate, glyceryl diricinoleate, glyceryl dipalmitate, glyceryl dipalmitoleate, glyceryl distearate, glyceryl palmitate lactate, glyceryl stearate citrate, glyceryl stearate lactate, and glyceryl stearate succinate.
Int J Toxicol; 2007; 26 Suppl 3():1-30. PubMed ID: 18273450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomized prospective trial of the cutaneous and sensory effects of feminine hygiene wet wipes.
Farage MA; Stadler A; Chassard D; Pelisse M
J Reprod Med; 2008 Oct; 53(10):765-73. PubMed ID: 19004402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
