124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15059182)
1. In vivo epidermal thickness measurement: ultrasound vs. confocal imaging.
Nouveau-Richard S; Monot M; Bastien P; de Lacharrière O
Skin Res Technol; 2004 May; 10(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 15059182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the stratum corneum thickness measured in vivo with confocal Raman spectroscopy and confocal reflectance microscopy.
Böhling A; Bielfeldt S; Himmelmann A; Keskin M; Wilhelm KP
Skin Res Technol; 2014 Feb; 20(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 23909688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measuring the effects of topical moisturizers on changes in stratum corneum thickness, water gradients and hydration in vivo.
Crowther JM; Sieg A; Blenkiron P; Marcott C; Matts PJ; Kaczvinsky JR; Rawlings AV
Br J Dermatol; 2008 Sep; 159(3):567-77. PubMed ID: 18616783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultra-high frequency ultrasound detection of the dermo-epidermal junction: Its potential role in dermatology.
Granieri G; Oranges T; Morganti R; Janowska A; Romanelli M; Manni E; Dini V
Exp Dermatol; 2022 Dec; 31(12):1863-1871. PubMed ID: 36017602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of skin extension upon the epidermal morphometry, an in vivo study.
Lévêque JL; Fanian F; Humbert P
Skin Res Technol; 2014 Feb; 20(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 23800127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The top echorich band in a 50-MHz ultrasound sonogram reflects epidermal properties.
Qu D; Whitehead S
J Cosmet Sci; 2015; 66(5):285-93. PubMed ID: 26753432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of repeated sunbed exposures on the human skin. In vivo measurements with confocal microscopy.
Gambichler T; Sauermann K; Altintas MA; Paech V; Kreuter A; Altmeyer P; Hoffmann K
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 2004 Feb; 20(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 14738530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sonography of the skin at 100 MHz enables in vivo visualization of stratum corneum and viable epidermis in palmar skin and psoriatic plaques.
El Gammal S; El Gammal C; Kaspar K; Pieck C; Altmeyer P; Vogt M; Ermert H
J Invest Dermatol; 1999 Nov; 113(5):821-9. PubMed ID: 10571740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vivo characterization of healthy human skin with a novel, non-invasive imaging technique: line-field confocal optical coherence tomography.
Monnier J; Tognetti L; Miyamoto M; Suppa M; Cinotti E; Fontaine M; Perez J; Orte Cano C; Yélamos O; Puig S; Dubois A; Rubegni P; Del Marmol V; Malvehy J; Perrot JL
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2020 Dec; 34(12):2914-2921. PubMed ID: 32786124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. View of normal human skin in vivo as observed using fluorescent fiber-optic confocal microscopic imaging.
Swindle LD; Thomas SG; Freeman M; Delaney PM
J Invest Dermatol; 2003 Oct; 121(4):706-12. PubMed ID: 14632185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Psoriasis vulgaris in 50 MHz B-scan ultrasound--characteristic features of stratum corneum, epidermis and dermis.
el Gammal S; Auer T; Popp C; Hoffmann K; Altmeyer P; Passmann C; Ermert H
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1994; 186():173-6. PubMed ID: 8073827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vivo quantification of epidermis pigmentation and dermis papilla density with reflectance confocal microscopy: variations with age and skin phototype.
Lagarrigue SG; George J; Questel E; Lauze C; Meyer N; Lagarde JM; Simon M; Schmitt AM; Serre G; Paul C
Exp Dermatol; 2012 Apr; 21(4):281-6. PubMed ID: 22417304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vivo detection of healthy skin: Comparison of multiphoton microscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy.
Chen KJ; Wang ZY; Han Y; Cui Y
Skin Res Technol; 2023 May; 29(5):e13340. PubMed ID: 37231920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Variation in epidermal morphology in human skin at different body sites as measured by reflectance confocal microscopy.
Robertson K; Rees JL
Acta Derm Venereol; 2010 Jul; 90(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 20574601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Application of leukotriene B4 and reflectance confocal microscopy as a noninvasive in vivo model to study the dynamics of skin inflammation.
Peppelman M; Wolberink EA; Gerritsen MJ; van de Kerkhof PC; van Erp PE
Skin Res Technol; 2015 May; 21(2):232-40. PubMed ID: 25156913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Unsupervised delineation of stratum corneum using reflectance confocal microscopy and spectral clustering.
Bozkurt A; Kose K; Alessi-Fox C; Dy JG; Brooks DH; Rajadhyaksha M
Skin Res Technol; 2017 May; 23(2):176-185. PubMed ID: 27516408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of gender and age on the thickness and echo-density of skin.
Firooz A; Rajabi-Estarabadi A; Zartab H; Pazhohi N; Fanian F; Janani L
Skin Res Technol; 2017 Feb; 23(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 27273751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the atrophogenic potential of different glucocorticoids using optical coherence tomography, 20-MHz ultrasound and profilometry; a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Cossmann M; Welzel J
Br J Dermatol; 2006 Oct; 155(4):700-6. PubMed ID: 16965418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Topographic variations in normal skin, as viewed by in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy.
Huzaira M; Rius F; Rajadhyaksha M; Anderson RR; González S
J Invest Dermatol; 2001 Jun; 116(6):846-52. PubMed ID: 11407970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Age related changes of human skin investigated with histometric measurements by confocal laser scanning microscopy in vivo.
Sauermann K; Clemann S; Jaspers S; Gambichler T; Altmeyer P; Hoffmann K; Ennen J
Skin Res Technol; 2002 Feb; 8(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 12005120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
