These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15061268)

  • 1. Gated blood-pool SPECT automated versus manual left ventricular function calculations.
    Slart RH; Poot L; Piers DA; van Veldhuisen DJ; Nichols K; Jager PL
    Nucl Med Commun; 2004 Jan; 25(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 15061268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The value of a completely automatic ECG gated blood pool SPECT processing method for the estimation of global systolic left ventricular function.
    Daou D; Coaguila C; Benada A; Razzouk M; Haidar M; Colin P; Lebtahi R; Slama M; Guludec DL
    Nucl Med Commun; 2004 Mar; 25(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 15094446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of right ventricular function by NuSMUGA software: gated blood-pool SPECT vs. first-pass radionuclide angiography.
    Slart RH; Poot L; Piers DA; van Veldhuisen DJ; Jager PL
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2003 Oct; 19(5):401-7. PubMed ID: 14609189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes from gated blood-pool SPECT: comparison with planar gated blood-pool imaging and assessment of repeatability in patients with heart failure.
    Wright GA; Thackray S; Howey S; Cleland JG
    J Nucl Med; 2003 Apr; 44(4):494-8. PubMed ID: 12679390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrocardiographically gated blood-pool SPECT and left ventricular function: comparative value of 3 methods for ejection fraction and volume estimation.
    Daou D; Harel F; Helal BO; Fourme T; Colin P; Lebtahi R; Mariano-Goulart D; Faraggi M; Slama M; Le Guludec D
    J Nucl Med; 2001 Jul; 42(7):1043-9. PubMed ID: 11438625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Planar imaging versus gated blood-pool SPECT for the assessment of ventricular performance: a multicenter study.
    Groch MW; DePuey EG; Belzberg AC; Erwin WD; Kamran M; Barnett CA; Hendel RC; Spies SM; Ali A; Marshall RC
    J Nucl Med; 2001 Dec; 42(12):1773-9. PubMed ID: 11752072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of quantitative gated single photon emission computed tomography and an automated scoring system for the assessment of regional left ventricular systolic function.
    Hashimoto A; Nakata T; Wakabayashi T; Kyuma M; Takahashi T; Tsuchihashi K; Shimamoto K
    Nucl Med Commun; 2002 Sep; 23(9):887-98. PubMed ID: 12195094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gated blood pool SPECT for measurement of left ventricular volumes and left ventricular ejection fraction: comparison of 8 and 16 frame gated blood pool SPECT.
    Kim SJ; Kim IJ; Kim YS; Kim YK
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2005; 21(2-3):261-6. PubMed ID: 16015439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative value of ECG-gated blood pool SPET and ECG-gated myocardial perfusion SPET in the assessment of global systolic left ventricular function.
    Daou D; Vilain D; Colin P; Lebtahi R; Fourme T; Coaguila C; Benada A; Idy-Peretti I; Slama M; Le Guludec D
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Jun; 30(6):859-67. PubMed ID: 12677300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical validation of the gated blood pool SPECT QBS processing software in congestive heart failure patients: correlation with MUGA, first-pass RNV and 2D-echocardiography.
    Hacker M; Hoyer X; Kupzyk S; La Fougere C; Kois J; Stempfle HU; Tiling R; Hahn K; Störk S
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2006; 22(3-4):407-16. PubMed ID: 16328851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variability of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes with quantitative gated SPECT: influence of algorithm, pixel size and reconstruction parameters in small and normal-sized hearts.
    Hambye AS; Vervaet A; Dobbeleir A
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2004 Dec; 31(12):1606-13. PubMed ID: 15290114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automatic quantification of right ventricular function with gated blood pool SPECT.
    Daou D; Van Kriekinge SD; Coaguila C; Lebtahi R; Fourme T; Sitbon O; Parent F; Slama M; Le Guludec D; Simonneau G
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2004; 11(3):293-304. PubMed ID: 15173776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Model dependence of gated blood pool SPECT ventricular function measurements.
    Nichols K; Humayun N; De Bondt P; Vandenberghe S; Akinboboye OO; Bergmann SR
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2004; 11(3):282-92. PubMed ID: 15173775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of 4D-MSPECT and QGS for quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction from gated 99mTc-MIBI SPET: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
    Lipke CS; Kühl HP; Nowak B; Kaiser HJ; Reinartz P; Koch KC; Buell U; Schaefer WM
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2004 Apr; 31(4):482-90. PubMed ID: 14722679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of left and right ventricular functional parameters with automatic edge detection program of ECG gated blood SPET.
    Higuchi T; Taki J; Nakajima K; Kinuya S; Ikeda M; Namura M; Tonami N
    Nucl Med Commun; 2003 May; 24(5):559-63. PubMed ID: 12717074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative values of gated blood-pool SPECT and CMR for ejection fraction and volume estimation.
    Sibille L; Bouallegue FB; Bourdon A; Micheau A; Vernhet-Kovacsik H; Mariano-Goulart D
    Nucl Med Commun; 2011 Feb; 32(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 21057340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction with cardiofocal collimators: Comparison between IQ-SPECT, planar equilibrium radionuclide angiography, and cardiac magnetic resonance.
    Pelletier-Galarneau M; Finnerty V; Tan S; Authier S; Gregoire J; Harel F
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2019 Dec; 26(6):1857-1864. PubMed ID: 29520572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of two software in gated myocardial perfusion single photon emission tomography, for the measurement of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction, in patients with and without perfusion defects.
    Kakhki VR; Zakavi SR; Sadeghi R
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2007; 10(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 17450245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of 180 degrees and 360 degrees data acquisition for determination of left ventricular function from gated myocardial perfusion tomography and gated blood pool tomography.
    Vanhove C; Franken PR; Defrise M; Bossuyt A
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Nov; 30(11):1498-504. PubMed ID: 14579089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative study of quantitative blood pool SPECT imaging with 180 degrees and 360 degrees acquisition orbits on accuracy of cardiac function.
    Adachi I; Umeda T; Shimomura H; Suwa M; Komori T; Ogura Y; Utsunomiya K; Kitaura Y; Narabayashi I
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2005; 12(2):186-94. PubMed ID: 15812373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.