304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15061889)
1. [Clinical evaluation of ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments in management of curved root canals].
Xu Q; Fan B; Fan MW; Bian Z
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Mar; 39(2):136-8. PubMed ID: 15061889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Clinical evaluation of two types of NiTi rotary instruments in preparation of root canals].
Hu XL; Ling JQ; Chen H; Gu HJ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Jan; 40(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 15774145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Vlassis M
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Clinical evaluation of three nickel-titanium rotary instruments in preparation of curved root canals].
Xu Q; Fan MW; Fan B; Ling JQ; Chen H; Wei X
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Aug; 23(4):286-8, 291. PubMed ID: 16178185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Clinical evaluation of nickel-titanium rotary instruments Hero 642 in root canal preparation].
Xu Q; Lin JQ; Chen H; Wei X
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2005 Feb; 14(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 15747003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals.
Yun HH; Kim SK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Feb; 95(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 12582365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
Schäfer E; Vlassis M
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 15056349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effectiveness of a hand file and three nickel-titanium rotary instruments for removing gutta-percha in curved root canals during retreatment.
Schirrmeister JF; Wrbas KT; Schneider FH; Altenburger MJ; Hellwig E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):542-7. PubMed ID: 16545721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative investigation of 2 rotary nickel-titanium instruments: protaper universal versus protaper.
Unal GC; Maden M; Savgat A; Onur Orhan E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jun; 107(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 19386519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The effect of instrumentation on original apical foramen shape using steel vs niti rotatory: computerized analysis].
Gallina G; Cumbo E; Gallo P; Pizzo G; D'Angelo M
Minerva Stomatol; 2002; 51(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 11845115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy, cleaning ability and safety of different rotary NiTi instruments in root canal retreatment.
Hülsmann M; Bluhm V
Int Endod J; 2004 Jul; 37(7):468-76. PubMed ID: 15189436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Paqué F; Musch U; Hülsmann M
Int Endod J; 2005 Jan; 38(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 15606817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy of rotary instruments with greater taper in preparing oval root canals.
Elayouti A; Chu AL; Kimionis I; Klein C; Weiger R; Löst C
Int Endod J; 2008 Dec; 41(12):1088-92. PubMed ID: 19133098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparative study of hand-held nickel-titanium dental instruments based on the shape of the prepared root canal].
Szabó J; Serbán T; Nagy G; Madléna M; Ipolyi T
Fogorv Sz; 2003 Dec; 96(6):273-6. PubMed ID: 14971265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Clinical analysis of fine root canal preparation with ProTaper rotary instruments].
Zhuang ZX; Ren F; He ZF
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2007 Dec; 27(12):1875-7. PubMed ID: 18159008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy of ProTaper Universal rotary retreatment system for gutta-percha removal from root canals.
Gu LS; Ling JQ; Wei X; Huang XY
Int Endod J; 2008 Apr; 41(4):288-95. PubMed ID: 18081804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Canal preparation with Hero 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-file assessed using computed tomography.
Taşdemir T; Aydemir H; Inan U; Unal O
Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):402-8. PubMed ID: 15910476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Jodway B; Hülsmann M
Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of three Ni-Ti rotary instruments in apical transportation.
Javaheri HH; Javaheri GH
J Endod; 2007 Mar; 33(3):284-6. PubMed ID: 17320715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Shaping ability and safety of five different rotary nickel-titanium instruments compared with stainless steel hand instrumentation in simulated curved root canals.
Schirrmeister JF; Strohl C; Altenburger MJ; Wrbas KT; Hellwig E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jun; 101(6):807-13. PubMed ID: 16731405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
