BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15062140)

  • 1. Toward a dynamic real-time intraoperative permanent prostate brachytherapy methodology.
    Potters L; Calguaru E; Thornton KB; Jackson T; Huang D
    Brachytherapy; 2003; 2(3):172-80. PubMed ID: 15062140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is there a role for postimplant dosimetry after real-time dynamic permanent prostate brachytherapy?
    Potters L; Calugaru E; Jassal A; Presser J
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jul; 65(4):1014-9. PubMed ID: 16682144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intraoperative real-time planned conformal prostate brachytherapy: post-implantation dosimetric outcome and clinical implications.
    Zelefsky MJ; Yamada Y; Cohen GN; Sharma N; Shippy AM; Fridman D; Zaider M
    Radiother Oncol; 2007 Aug; 84(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 17692978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CT-ultrasound fusion prostate brachytherapy: a dynamic dosimetry feedback and improvement method. A report of 54 consecutive cases.
    Fuller DB; Jin H; Koziol JA; Feng AC
    Brachytherapy; 2005; 4(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 16182221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Seed localization and TRUS-fluoroscopy fusion for intraoperative prostate brachytherapy dosimetry.
    Su Y; Davis BJ; Furutani KM; Herman MG; Robb RA
    Comput Aided Surg; 2007 Jan; 12(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 17364656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of intraoperative edema during transperineal permanent prostate brachytherapy on computer-optimized and preimplant planning techniques.
    Yamada Y; Potters L; Zaider M; Cohen G; Venkatraman E; Zelefsky MJ
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2003 Oct; 26(5):e130-5. PubMed ID: 14528087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Initial comparison of inverse optimization, modified peripheral technique, and geometric optimization as real-time intraoperative computer planning options for permanent seed implantation of the prostate.
    Raben A; Sammons S; Sim S; Chen H; Hanlon A; Sarkar A; Donavanik V; Grebler A; Geltzeiler J; Benge B; Glick A; Jacob D; Koprowski P
    Brachytherapy; 2007; 6(4):238-45. PubMed ID: 17991621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of CT- and radiograph-based post-implant dosimetry for transperineal 125I prostate brachytherapy using single seeds and a commercial treatment-planning software.
    Siebert FA; Kohr P; Kovács G
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2006 Feb; 182(2):96-101. PubMed ID: 16447016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative study of permanent interstitial prostate brachytherapy post-implant evaluation among seven Italian institutes.
    Mangili P; Stea L; Cattani F; Lappi S; Giglioli F; Calamia E; Ziglio F; Martinelli R; Longobardi B
    Radiother Oncol; 2004 Apr; 71(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 15066291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Review of intraoperative imaging and planning techniques in permanent seed prostate brachytherapy.
    Polo A; Salembier C; Venselaar J; Hoskin P;
    Radiother Oncol; 2010 Jan; 94(1):12-23. PubMed ID: 20074822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dosimetry accuracy as a function of seed localization uncertainty in permanent prostate brachytherapy: increased seed number correlates with less variability in prostate dosimetry.
    Su Y; Davis BJ; Furutani KM; Herman MG; Robb RA
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3105-19. PubMed ID: 17505092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intraoperative conformal optimization for transperineal prostate implantation using magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging.
    Zelefsky MJ; Cohen G; Zakian KL; Dyke J; Koutcher JA; Hricak H; Schwartz L; Zaider M
    Cancer J; 2000; 6(4):249-55. PubMed ID: 11038145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Five-year outcome of intraoperative conformal permanent I-125 interstitial implantation for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Zelefsky MJ; Yamada Y; Cohen GN; Shippy A; Chan H; Fridman D; Zaider M
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Jan; 67(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 17189063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality of life of patients after permanent prostate brachytherapy in relation to dosimetry.
    Van Gellekom MP; Moerland MA; Van Vulpen M; Wijrdeman HK; Battermann JJ
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Nov; 63(3):772-80. PubMed ID: 15964707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparative study of seed localization and dose calculation on pre- and post-implantation ultrasound and CT images for low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
    Ali I; Algan O; Thompson S; Sindhwani P; Herman T; Cheng CY; Ahmad S
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 54(18):5595-611. PubMed ID: 19717887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlation between real-time intraoperative and postoperative dosimetry and its implications on intraoperative planning.
    Yan C; Huq MS; Heron DE; Beriwal S; Wynn RB
    Brachytherapy; 2019; 18(3):338-347. PubMed ID: 30655047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of the precision of seeds deposited as loose seeds versus suture embedded seeds: a randomized trial.
    Kaplan ID; Meskell PM; Lieberfarb M; Saltzman B; Berg S; Holupka EJ
    Brachytherapy; 2004; 3(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 15110307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prostate seed implantation using 3D-computer assisted intraoperative planning vs. a standard look-up nomogram: Improved target conformality with reduction in urethral and rectal wall dose.
    Raben A; Chen H; Grebler A; Geltzeiler J; Geltzeiler M; Keselman I; Litvin S; Sim S; Hanlon A; Yang J
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Dec; 60(5):1631-8. PubMed ID: 15590195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Intraoperative and post-implant dosimetry in patients treated with permanent prostate implant brachytherapy].
    Herein A; Ágoston P; Szabó Z; Jorgo K; Markgruber B; Pesznyák C; Polgár C; Major T
    Magy Onkol; 2015 Jun; 59(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 26035163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The robustness of dose distributions to displacement and migration of 125I permanent seed implants over a wide range of seed number, activity, and designs.
    Beaulieu L; Archambault L; Aubin S; Oral E; Taschereau R; Pouliot J
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Mar; 58(4):1298-308. PubMed ID: 15001275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.