These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15062717)

  • 1. Dynamic stabilization devices in the treatment of low back pain.
    Sengupta DK
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2004 Jan; 35(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 15062717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Research process on dynamic stabilization system of low back pain].
    Wang H; Lin HB
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2008 Jan; 21(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 19102290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamic stabilization devices in the treatment of low back pain.
    Sengupta DK
    Neurol India; 2005 Dec; 53(4):466-74. PubMed ID: 16565539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities.
    McAfee PC; Cunningham BW; Hayes V; Sidiqi F; Dabbah M; Sefter JC; Hu N; Beatson H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19 Suppl):S152-60. PubMed ID: 16946633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Disc arthroplasty design influences intervertebral kinematics and facet forces.
    Rousseau MA; Bradford DS; Bertagnoli R; Hu SS; Lotz JC
    Spine J; 2006; 6(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 16651219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [ProDisc-C mobile replacement of an intervertebral disc. A prospective mono-centric two-year study].
    Stulík J; Kryl J; Sebesta P; Vyskocil T; Krbec M; Trc T
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2008 Aug; 75(4):253-61. PubMed ID: 18760080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Dynesys lumbar spinal stabilization system: a preliminary report on positional magnetic resonance imaging findings.
    Beastall J; Karadimas E; Siddiqui M; Nicol M; Hughes J; Smith F; Wardlaw D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):685-90. PubMed ID: 17413475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of instrumented pedicle screws to evaluate load sharing in posterior dynamic stabilization systems.
    Meyers K; Tauber M; Sudin Y; Fleischer S; Arnin U; Girardi F; Wright T
    Spine J; 2008; 8(6):926-32. PubMed ID: 18037350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Basic scientific considerations in total disc arthroplasty.
    Cunningham BW
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):219S-230S. PubMed ID: 15541670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Response of Charité total disc replacement under physiologic loads: prosthesis component motion patterns.
    O'Leary P; Nicolakis M; Lorenz MA; Voronov LI; Zindrick MR; Ghanayem A; Havey RM; Carandang G; Sartori M; Gaitanis IN; Fronczak S; Patwardhan AG
    Spine J; 2005; 5(6):590-9. PubMed ID: 16291097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective, randomized trial of metal-on-metal artificial lumbar disc replacement: initial results for treatment of discogenic pain.
    Sasso RC; Foulk DM; Hahn M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 18197095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rationale, principles and experimental evaluation of the concept of soft stabilization.
    Mulholland RC; Sengupta DK
    Eur Spine J; 2002 Oct; 11 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S198-205. PubMed ID: 12384745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanics of the posterior lumbar articulating elements.
    Serhan HA; Varnavas G; Dooris AP; Patwadhan A; Tzermiadianos M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2007 Jan; 22(1):E1. PubMed ID: 17608330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Total disc replacement positioning affects facet contact forces and vertebral body strains.
    Rundell SA; Auerbach JD; Balderston RA; Kurtz SM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 18978591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion.
    Levin DA; Bendo JA; Quirno M; Errico T; Goldstein J; Spivak J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2905-9. PubMed ID: 18246016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-segment fusion of the thoracolumbar spine in conjunction with a motion-preserving artificial disc replacement: case report and review of the literature.
    Lehman RA; Lenke LG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(7):E240-5. PubMed ID: 17414900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two in vivo surgical approaches for lumbar corpectomy using allograft and a metallic implant: a controlled clinical and biomechanical study.
    Huang P; Gupta MC; Sarigul-Klijn N; Hazelwood S
    Spine J; 2006; 6(6):648-58. PubMed ID: 17088195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fulcrum assisted soft stabilization system: a new concept in the surgical treatment of degenerative low back pain.
    Sengupta DK; Mulholland RC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 May; 30(9):1019-29; discussion 1030. PubMed ID: 15864153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of facetectomy and crosslink augmentation on motion segment flexibility in posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Chutkan NB; Zhou H; Akins JP; Wenger KH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Oct; 33(22):E828-35. PubMed ID: 18923306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Revision strategies for single- and two-level total disc arthroplasty procedures: a biomechanical perspective.
    Cunningham BW; Hu N; Beatson HJ; Serhan H; Sefter JC; McAfee PC
    Spine J; 2009 Sep; 9(9):735-43. PubMed ID: 19477694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.