These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1506295)

  • 1. Correlated changes in reproductive components accompanying 10 generations of selection for improved sow productivity index.
    Neal SM; Irvin KM
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Aug; 70(8):2322-7. PubMed ID: 1506295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changes in ovulation rate, uterine capacity, uterine dimensions, and parity effects with selection for litter size in swine.
    Gama LL; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 1993 Mar; 71(3):608-17. PubMed ID: 8463147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reproduction of 3/4 White Composite and 1/4 Duroc, 1/4 Meishan, 1/4 Fengjing, or 1/4 Minzhu gilts and sows.
    Young LD
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Jun; 76(6):1559-67. PubMed ID: 9655575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Examination of the relationship between the estrogen receptor gene and reproductive traits in swine.
    Isler BJ; Irvin KM; Neal SM; Moeller SJ; Davis ME
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Sep; 80(9):2334-9. PubMed ID: 12350010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selection for uterine capacity improves lifetime productivity of sows.
    Freking BA; Lents CA; Vallet JL
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2016 Apr; 167():16-21. PubMed ID: 26869209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of genetic line and supplemental dietary fat on lactation performance of Duroc and Landrace sows.
    Shurson GC; Irvin KM
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Oct; 70(10):2942-9. PubMed ID: 1429269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigations into the control of litter size in swine: II. Comparisons of morphological and functional embryonic diversity between Chinese and American breeds.
    Anderson LH; Christenson LK; Christenson RK; Ford SP
    J Anim Sci; 1993 Jun; 71(6):1566-71. PubMed ID: 8325818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Space allowance for dry, pregnant sows in pens: body condition, skin lesions, and performance.
    Salak-Johnson JL; Niekamp SR; Rodriguez-Zas SL; Ellis M; Curtis SE
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Jul; 85(7):1758-69. PubMed ID: 17371790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of mass selection for increased weight at two ages on growth rate and carcass composition of Duroc-Landrace pigs.
    Bullock KD; Kuhlers DL; Jungst SB
    J Anim Sci; 1991 Apr; 69(4):1409-19. PubMed ID: 2071506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sow line differences in heat stress tolerance expressed in reproductive performance traits.
    Bloemhof S; van der Waaij EH; Merks JW; Knol EF
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Dec; 86(12):3330-7. PubMed ID: 18708608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Responses in ovulation rate, embryonal survival, and litter traits in swine to 14 generations of selection to increase litter size.
    Johnson RK; Nielsen MK; Casey DS
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Mar; 77(3):541-57. PubMed ID: 10229349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationships between uterine and fetal traits in rabbits selected on uterine capacity.
    Argente MJ; Santacreu MA; Climent A; Blasco A
    J Anim Sci; 2003 May; 81(5):1265-73. PubMed ID: 12772854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Embryonic and fetal development in a commercial dam-line genotype.
    Town SC; Patterson JL; Pereira CZ; Gourley G; Foxcroft GR
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2005 Feb; 85(3-4):301-16. PubMed ID: 15581513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can a super sow be a robust sow? Consequences of litter investment in purebred and crossbred sows of different parities.
    Ocepek M; Andersen-Ranberg I; Edwards SA; Fredriksen B; Framstad T; Andersen IL
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Aug; 94(8):3550-3560. PubMed ID: 27695774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Number of fetuses and conceptus growth throughout gestation in lines of pigs selected for ovulation rate or uterine capacity.
    Freking BA; Leymaster KA; Vallet JL; Christenson RK
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Sep; 85(9):2093-103. PubMed ID: 17504953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Direct and correlated responses to two-stage selection for ovulation rate and number of fully formed pigs at birth in swine.
    Ruíz-Flores A; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Sep; 79(9):2286-97. PubMed ID: 11583415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Responses to 19 generations of litter size selection in the Nebraska Index line. I. Reproductive responses estimated in pure line and crossbred litters.
    Petry DB; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Apr; 82(4):1000-6. PubMed ID: 15080320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of live weight development and reproduction in first parity on reproductive performance of second parity sows.
    Hoving LL; Soede NM; Graat EA; Feitsma H; Kemp B
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2010 Oct; 122(1-2):82-9. PubMed ID: 20727690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conceptus and maternal responses to increased feed intake during early gestation in pigs.
    Musser RE; Davis DL; Dritz SS; Tokach MD; Nelssen JL; Minton JE; Goodband RD
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Nov; 82(11):3154-61. PubMed ID: 15542461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Piglet birth weight and litter uniformity: effects of weaning-to-pregnancy interval and body condition changes in sows of different parities and crossbred lines.
    Wientjes JG; Soede NM; Knol EF; van den Brand H; Kemp B
    J Anim Sci; 2013 May; 91(5):2099-107. PubMed ID: 23463562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.