239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1506305)
1. Beef carcass composition of slaughter cattle differing in frame size, muscle score, and external fatness.
May SG; Mies WL; Edwards JW; Williams FL; Wise JW; Morgan JB; Savell JW; Cross HR
J Anim Sci; 1992 Aug; 70(8):2431-45. PubMed ID: 1506305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of frame size, muscle score, and external fatness on live and carcass value of beef cattle.
May SG; Mies WL; Edwards JW; Williams FL; Wise JW; Harris JJ; Savell JW; Cross HR
J Anim Sci; 1992 Nov; 70(11):3311-6. PubMed ID: 1459891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using live estimates and ultrasound measurements to predict beef carcass cutability.
May SG; Mies WL; Edwards JW; Harris JJ; Morgan JB; Garrett RP; Williams FL; Wise JW; Cross HR; Savell JW
J Anim Sci; 2000 May; 78(5):1255-61. PubMed ID: 10834579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of sex-class, USDA yield grade and USDA quality grade on seam fat trim from the primals of beef carcasses.
Jones DK; Savell JW; Cross HR
J Anim Sci; 1990 Jul; 68(7):1987-91. PubMed ID: 2384389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimates of subprimal yields from beef carcasses as affected by USDA grades, subcutaneous fat trim level, and carcass sex class and type.
Griffin DB; Savell JW; Morgan JB; Garrett RP; Cross HR
J Anim Sci; 1992 Aug; 70(8):2411-30. PubMed ID: 1506304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gluteus medius and rump fat depths as additional live animal ultrasound measurements for predicting retail product and trimmable fat in beef carcasses.
Realini CE; Williams RE; Pringle TD; Bertrand JK
J Anim Sci; 2001 Jun; 79(6):1378-85. PubMed ID: 11424672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of live and carcass equations predicting percentage of cutability, retail product weight, and trimmable fat in beef cattle.
Herring WO; Williams SE; Bertrand JK; Benyshek LL; Miller DC
J Anim Sci; 1994 May; 72(5):1107-18. PubMed ID: 8056655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Yield grade and carcass weight effects on the cutability of lamb carcasses fabricated into innovative style subprimals.
Garrett RP; Savell JW; Cross HR; Johnson HK
J Anim Sci; 1992 Jun; 70(6):1829-39. PubMed ID: 1634407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predicting carcass composition of beef cattle using ultrasound technology.
Griffin DB; Savell JW; Recio HA; Garrett RP; Cross HR
J Anim Sci; 1999 Apr; 77(4):889-92. PubMed ID: 10328353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of retail product and trimmable fat yields from the four primal cuts in beef cattle using ultrasound or carcass data.
Tait RG; Wilson DE; Rouse GH
J Anim Sci; 2005 Jun; 83(6):1353-60. PubMed ID: 15890812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Carcass traits, cut yields, and compositional end points in high-lean-yielding pork carcasses: effects of 10th rib backfat and loin eye area.
Pringle TD; Williams SE
J Anim Sci; 2001 Jan; 79(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 11204691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Determining beef carcass retail product and fat yields within 1 hour postmortem.
Apple JK; Dikeman ME; Cundiff LV; Wise JW
J Anim Sci; 1991 Dec; 69(12):4845-57. PubMed ID: 1808179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of zilpaterol hydrochloride on retail yields of subprimals from beef and calf-fed Holstein steers.
Haneklaus AN; Hodgen JM; Delmore RJ; Lawrence TE; Yates DA; Allen DM; Griffin DB; Savell JW
J Anim Sci; 2011 Sep; 89(9):2867-77. PubMed ID: 21478448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimates of beef carcass intermuscular fat.
Kent KR; Davis GW; Ramsey CB; Schluter AR
J Anim Sci; 1991 Dec; 69(12):4836-44. PubMed ID: 1808178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predicting percentage of retail yield from carcass measurements, the yield grading equation, and closely trimmed, boxed beef weights.
Reiling BA; Rouse GH; Duello DA
J Anim Sci; 1992 Jul; 70(7):2151-8. PubMed ID: 1644688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Live and carcass values from different cattle types.
Mies WL; Harris JJ; Knapp RH; Edwards JW; Terry CA; Savell JW; Cross HR
J Anim Sci; 1992 May; 70(5):1314-25. PubMed ID: 1526899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of body condition score on carcass characteristics and subprimal yield from cull beef cows.
Apple JK; Davis JC; Stephenson J; Hankins JE; Davis JR; Beaty SL
J Anim Sci; 1999 Oct; 77(10):2660-9. PubMed ID: 10521025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using current on-line carcass evaluation parameters to estimate boneless and bone-in pork carcass yield as influenced by trim level.
Berg EP; Grams DW; Miller RK; Wise JW; Forrest JC; Savell JW
J Anim Sci; 1999 Aug; 77(8):1977-84. PubMed ID: 10461971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of feeder cattle frame size, muscle thickness, and age class on days fed, weight, and carcass composition.
Dolezal HG; Tatum JD; Williams FL
J Anim Sci; 1993 Nov; 71(11):2975-85. PubMed ID: 8270518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of feeding zilpaterol hydrochloride with and without monensin and tylosin on carcass cutability and meat palatability of beef steers.
Hilton GG; Montgomery JL; Krehbiel CR; Yates DA; Hutcheson JP; Nichols WT; Streeter MN; Blanton JR; Miller MF
J Anim Sci; 2009 Apr; 87(4):1394-406. PubMed ID: 19028853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
