244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15064164)
21. Natural variability and the influence of concurrent control values on the detection and interpretation of low-dose or weak endocrine toxicities.
Ashby J; Tinwell H; Odum J; Lefevre P
Environ Health Perspect; 2004 Jun; 112(8):847-53. PubMed ID: 15175171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effects of p-nonylphenol (NP) and diethylstilboestrol (DES) on the Alderley Park (Alpk) rat: comparison of mammary gland and uterus sensitivity following oral gavage or implanted mini-pumps.
Odum J; Pyrah IT; Soames AR; Foster JR; Van Miller JP; Joiner RL; Ashby J
J Appl Toxicol; 1999; 19(5):367-78. PubMed ID: 10513683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Estrogenic effects of mixtures of phyto- and synthetic chemicals on uterine growth of prepubertal rats.
van Meeuwen JA; van den Berg M; Sanderson JT; Verhoef A; Piersma AH
Toxicol Lett; 2007 Apr; 170(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 17428625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Immature rat uterotrophic assay of bisphenol A.
Yamasaki K; Sawaki M; Takatsuki M
Environ Health Perspect; 2000 Dec; 108(12):1147-50. PubMed ID: 11133394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Potential estrogenic effects of bisphenol-A estimated by in vitro and in vivo combination assays.
Kim HS; Han SY; Yoo SD; Lee BM; Park KL
J Toxicol Sci; 2001 Aug; 26(3):111-8. PubMed ID: 11552294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Accurate prediction of the response of freshwater fish to a mixture of estrogenic chemicals.
Brian JV; Harris CA; Scholze M; Backhaus T; Booy P; Lamoree M; Pojana G; Jonkers N; Runnalls T; Bonfà A; Marcomini A; Sumpter JP
Environ Health Perspect; 2005 Jun; 113(6):721-8. PubMed ID: 15929895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An approach for assessing estrogen receptor-mediated interactions in mixtures of three chemicals: a pilot study.
Charles GD; Gennings C; Zacharewski TR; Gollapudi BB; Carney EW
Toxicol Sci; 2002 Aug; 68(2):349-60. PubMed ID: 12151631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Towards a generic physiologically based kinetic model to predict in vivo uterotrophic responses in rats by reverse dosimetry of in vitro estrogenicity data.
Zhang M; van Ravenzwaay B; Fabian E; Rietjens IMCM; Louisse J
Arch Toxicol; 2018 Mar; 92(3):1075-1088. PubMed ID: 29234833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The OECD program to validate the rat uterotrophic bioassay to screen compounds for in vivo estrogenic responses: phase 1.
Kanno J; Onyon L; Haseman J; Fenner-Crisp P; Ashby J; Owens W;
Environ Health Perspect; 2001 Aug; 109(8):785-94. PubMed ID: 11564613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Immature rat uterotrophic assay of 18 chemicals and Hershberger assay of 30 chemicals.
Yamasaki K; Takeyoshi M; Sawaki M; Imatanaka N; Shinoda K; Takatsuki M
Toxicology; 2003 Feb; 183(1-3):93-115. PubMed ID: 12504345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Uterotrophic effects of benzophenone derivatives and a p-hydroxybenzoate used in ultraviolet screens.
Koda T; Umezu T; Kamata R; Morohoshi K; Ohta T; Morita M
Environ Res; 2005 May; 98(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 15721882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Defining the impact of weakly estrogenic chemicals on the action of steroidal estrogens.
Rajapakse N; Ong D; Kortenkamp A
Toxicol Sci; 2001 Apr; 60(2):296-304. PubMed ID: 11248142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Modeling the interaction of binary and ternary mixtures of estradiol with bisphenol A and bisphenol AF in an in vitro estrogen-mediated transcriptional activation assay (T47D-KBluc).
Bermudez DS; Gray LE; Wilson VS
Toxicol Sci; 2010 Aug; 116(2):477-87. PubMed ID: 20498000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The OECD program to validate the rat uterotrophic bioassay: an overview.
Owens W; Koëter HB
Environ Health Perspect; 2003 Sep; 111(12):1527-9. PubMed ID: 12948895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Exploring the sensitive indicators of uterotrophic assay in immature SD rats exposed to para-nonylphenol].
Hunag YN; Cheng WB; Xu PY; Yu WS; Li QY; Wang WD; Wang ZS; Pang DQ; Liu YQ
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2004 Jan; 35(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 14981825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparative activities of p-nonylphenol and diethylstilbestrol in noble rat mammary gland and uterotrophic assays.
Odum J; Pyrah IT; Foster JR; Van Miller JP; Joiner RL; Ashby J
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1999 Apr; 29(2 Pt 1):184-95. PubMed ID: 10341150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Variability in the uterotrophic response assay (an in vivo estrogenic response assay) in untreated control and positive control (DES-DP, 2.5 microG/kg, bid) Wistar and Sprague-Dawley rats.
Christian MS; Hoberman AM; Bachmann S; Hellwig J
Drug Chem Toxicol; 1998; 21 Suppl 1():51-100. PubMed ID: 10028404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The development of methods for assessing the in vivo oestrogen-like effects of xenobiotics in CD-1 mice.
Mehmood Z; Smith AG; Tucker MJ; Chuzel F; Carmichael NG
Food Chem Toxicol; 2000 Jun; 38(6):493-501. PubMed ID: 10828501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Activity of raloxifene in immature and ovariectomized rat uterotrophic assays.
Ashby J; Odum J; Foster JR
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1997 Jun; 25(3):226-31. PubMed ID: 9237325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Estrogenic effects in the immature rat uterus after dietary exposure to ethinylestradiol and zearalenone using a systems biology approach.
Heneweer M; Houtman R; Poortman J; Groot M; Maliepaard C; Peijnenburg A
Toxicol Sci; 2007 Sep; 99(1):303-14. PubMed ID: 17557909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
