BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15064295)

  • 1. A content analysis of e-mail communication between patients and their providers: patients get the message.
    White CB; Moyer CA; Stern DT; Katz SJ
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2004; 11(4):260-7. PubMed ID: 15064295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A content analysis of e-mail communication between primary care providers and parents.
    Anand SG; Feldman MJ; Geller DS; Bisbee A; Bauchner H
    Pediatrics; 2005 May; 115(5):1283-8. PubMed ID: 15867036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patient-physician e-mail: an opportunity to transform pediatric health care delivery.
    Rosen P; Kwoh CK
    Pediatrics; 2007 Oct; 120(4):701-6. PubMed ID: 17908755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experiences of patients who were early adopters of electronic communication with their physician: satisfaction, benefits, and concerns.
    Houston TK; Sands DZ; Jenckes MW; Ford DE
    Am J Manag Care; 2004 Sep; 10(9):601-8. PubMed ID: 15515992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of a triage-based E-mail system on clinic resource use and patient and physician satisfaction in primary care: a randomized controlled trial.
    Katz SJ; Moyer CA; Cox DT; Stern DT
    J Gen Intern Med; 2003 Sep; 18(9):736-44. PubMed ID: 12950483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can e-mail messages between patients and physicians be patient-centered?
    Roter DL; Larson S; Sands DZ; Ford DE; Houston T
    Health Commun; 2008; 23(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 18443995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bridging the electronic divide: patient and provider perspectives on e-mail communication in primary care.
    Moyer CA; Stern DT; Dobias KS; Cox DT; Katz SJ
    Am J Manag Care; 2002 May; 8(5):427-33. PubMed ID: 12019595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of primary care non-physician clinic staff in e-mail communication with patients.
    Kittler AF; Wald JS; Volk LA; Pizziferri L; Jagannath Y; Harris C; Lippincott M; Yu T; Hobbs J; Bates DW
    Int J Med Inform; 2004 May; 73(4):333-40. PubMed ID: 15135751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Crossing the digital divide: evaluating online communication between patients and their providers.
    Katz SJ; Nissan N; Moyer CA
    Am J Manag Care; 2004 Sep; 10(9):593-8. PubMed ID: 15515991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical e-mail in an academic dermatology setting.
    Kia KF; Tavakkoli A; Ellis CN
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2006 Jun; 54(6):1019-24. PubMed ID: 16713456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Results of a content analysis of electronic messages (email) sent between patients and their physicians.
    Sittig DF
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2003 Oct; 3():11. PubMed ID: 14519206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient-physician web messaging. The impact on message volume and satisfaction.
    Liederman EM; Lee JC; Baquero VH; Seites PG
    J Gen Intern Med; 2005 Jan; 20(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 15693928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. E-mail communications in primary care: what are patients' expectations for specific test results?
    Couchman GR; Forjuoh SN; Rascoe TG; Reis MD; Koehler B; Walsum KL
    Int J Med Inform; 2005 Jan; 74(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 15626633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Behind-the-scenes of patient-centered care: content analysis of electronic messaging among primary care clinic providers and staff.
    Stiles RA; Deppen SA; Figaro MK; Gregg WM; Jirjis JN; Rothman RL; Johnston PE; Miller RA; Dittus RS; Speroff T
    Med Care; 2007 Dec; 45(12):1205-9. PubMed ID: 18007171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experiences of physicians who frequently use e-mail with patients.
    Houston TK; Sands DZ; Nash BR; Ford DE
    Health Commun; 2003; 15(4):515-25. PubMed ID: 14527870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Internet use and e-mail communications between patients and providers: a survey of rheumatology outpatients.
    Siva C; Smarr KL; Hanson KD; Parikh M; Lawlor K; Ge B
    J Clin Rheumatol; 2008 Dec; 14(6):318-23. PubMed ID: 19033871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. E-mail and oncology: a survey of radiation oncology patients and their attitudes to a new generation of health communication.
    Katzen C; Solan MJ; Dicker AP
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2005; 8(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 15852052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development and validation of a scale to assess attitudes of health care administrators toward the use of e-mail communication between patients and physicians.
    Bhor M; Mason HL
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2006 Dec; 2(4):512-32. PubMed ID: 17161809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Medication safety messages for patients via the web portal: the MedCheck intervention.
    Weingart SN; Hamrick HE; Tutkus S; Carbo A; Sands DZ; Tess A; Davis RB; Bates DW; Phillips RS
    Int J Med Inform; 2008 Mar; 77(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 17581772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. E-mail communications in family practice: what do patients expect?
    Couchman GR; Forjuoh SN; Rascoe TG
    J Fam Pract; 2001 May; 50(5):414-8. PubMed ID: 11350705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.