125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15064537)
1. The effect of dropping low scores on ability estimates.
Bowles RP
J Appl Meas; 2004; 5(2):178-88. PubMed ID: 15064537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the 0.3 logits screening criterion in common item equating.
Miller GE; Rotou O; Twing JS
J Appl Meas; 2004; 5(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 15064536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Construct validity of scores/measures from a developmental assessment in mathematics using classical and many-facet Rasch measurement.
Banerji M
J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(2):177-98. PubMed ID: 12029177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of rater effects on weighted composite scores under nested and spiraled scoring designs, using the multifaceted Rasch model.
Taherbhai HM; Young MJ
J Outcome Meas; 2001-2002; 5(1):819-38. PubMed ID: 16320551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How to select aspirant laparoscopic surgical trainees: establishing concurrent validity comparing Xitact LS500 index performance scores with standardized psychomotor aptitude test battery scores.
Schijven MP; Jakimowicz JJ; Carter FJ
J Surg Res; 2004 Sep; 121(1):112-9. PubMed ID: 15313384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Setting performance standards for mannequin-based acute-care scenarios: an examinee-centered approach.
Boulet JR; Murray D; Kras J; Woodhouse J
Simul Healthc; 2008; 3(2):72-81. PubMed ID: 19088645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combining assessment scores--a variable feast.
Wilson I
Med Teach; 2008; 30(4):428-30. PubMed ID: 18569667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing holistic and analytic scoring for performance assessment with many-facet Rasch model.
Chi E
J Appl Meas; 2001; 2(4):379-88. PubMed ID: 12011505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reporting subscores for institutions.
Haberman S; Sinharay S; Puhan G
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):79-95. PubMed ID: 17937841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of reused questions on repeat examinees.
Wood TJ
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2009 Oct; 14(4):465-73. PubMed ID: 18528773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Expected linking error resulting from item parameter drift among the common Items on Rasch calibrated tests.
Miller GE; Gesn PR; Rotou J
J Appl Meas; 2005; 6(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 15701943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimation of decision consistency indices for complex assessments: model based approaches.
Stearns M; Smith RM
J Appl Meas; 2008; 9(3):305-15. PubMed ID: 18753697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Developing examinations that use equal raw scores for cut scores.
Swanlund A; Smith E
J Appl Meas; 2010; 11(4):432-42. PubMed ID: 21164230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rasch modeling of accuracy and confidence measures from cognitive tests.
Paek I; Lee J; Stankov L; Wilson M
J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(3):232-48. PubMed ID: 23816612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability: on the reproducibility of assessment data.
Downing SM
Med Educ; 2004 Sep; 38(9):1006-12. PubMed ID: 15327684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mapping multiple dimensions of student learning: the ConstructMap program.
Kennedy CA; Draney K
J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 19299881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating cognitive theory: a joint modeling approach using responses and response times.
Klein Entink RH; Kuhn JT; Hornke LF; Fox JP
Psychol Methods; 2009 Mar; 14(1):54-75. PubMed ID: 19271848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Method for calculating the distribution of randomly expected scores in a false-true-do not know-type of test].
Pérez-Padilla JR; Viniegra Velázquez L
Rev Invest Clin; 1989; 41(4):375-9. PubMed ID: 2631171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The presence and impact of local item dependence on objective structured clinical examinations scores and the potential use of the polytomous, many-facet Rasch model.
Lawson DM; Brailovsky C
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2006 Oct; 29(8):651-7. PubMed ID: 17045099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Corrected Rasch asymptotic standard errors for person ability estimates.
Smith RM
J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(4):351-64. PubMed ID: 9803720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
