146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 150651)
1. Double loop mass closure technique for abdominal incisions.
Burleson RL
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1978 Sep; 147(3):414-6. PubMed ID: 150651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mass closure versus layer closure of abdominal wound: a prospective clinical study.
Chowdhury SK; Choudhury SD
J Indian Med Assoc; 1994 Jul; 92(7):229-32. PubMed ID: 7963604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Theory and practice of continuous laparotomy suture (abdominal wound dehiscence and incisional hernia)].
Stelzner F
Chirurg; 1988 Oct; 59(10):654-60. PubMed ID: 2973974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Conventional running suture and continuous double loop closure: an experimental study of wound strength.
Cengiz Y; Månsson P; Israelsson LA
Eur J Surg; 2000 Aug; 166(8):647-9. PubMed ID: 11003435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Abdominal wall closure by means of provisionally applied metal wire].
Faragó P; Stella I
Zentralbl Chir; 1968 Sep; 93(37):1306-8. PubMed ID: 4235480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Mass closure of abdominal incisions and the role of suture technique in wound healing.
Rady AM; Rady MY
Acta Univ Carol Med (Praha); 1985; 31(5-6):385-92. PubMed ID: 2955679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Polyglyconate (Maxon) versus nylon suture in midline abdominal incision closure: a prospective randomized trial.
Carlson MA; Condon RE
Am Surg; 1995 Nov; 61(11):980-3. PubMed ID: 7486431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A simple mass-closure technique compared with layered technique in the closure of high-risk abdominal wounds.
Shittu OS; Ifenne DI; Ekwempu CC
West Afr J Med; 1995; 14(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 7626526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The superiority of polyglycolic acid sutures for closure of abdominal incisions.
Gallitano AL; Kondi ES
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1973 Nov; 137(5):794-6. PubMed ID: 4270499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Closure of midline incisions. A lot of small, same-size stitches in the aponeurosis improve wound healing].
Cengiz Y; Israelsson LA
Lakartidningen; 2002 Jun; 99(24):2742-4. PubMed ID: 12101600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Six-fold suture:wound length ratio for abdominal closure.
Varshney S; Manek P; Johnson CD
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1999 Sep; 81(5):333-6. PubMed ID: 10645176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparotomy closure.
Leaper DJ
Br J Hosp Med; 1985 Jun; 33(6):317-22. PubMed ID: 3160421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Skin closure in abdominal incisions. Continuous nylon suture versus Steristrip Tapesuture : a controlled trial.
Pedersen VM; Jensen BS; Hansen B
Acta Chir Scand; 1981; 147(8):619-22. PubMed ID: 6211884
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Burst abdomen. A preventable complication, monolayer closure of the abdominal incision with monofilament nylon.
Mathur SK
J Postgrad Med; 1983 Oct; 29(4):223-9. PubMed ID: 6368809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Results of the Smead-Jones technique of closure of vertical midline incisions for emergency laparotomies--a prospective study of 403 patients.
Sivam NS; Suresh S; Hadke MS; Kate V; Ananthakrishnan N
Trop Gastroenterol; 1995; 16(4):62-7. PubMed ID: 8854960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness of glycomer 631 monofilament sutures in closing musculoaponeurotic incisions.
Rodeheaver GT; Salopek LS; Green CW; Foresman PA; Suber F; Neal JG; Edlich RF
J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1998; 8(3-4):225-31. PubMed ID: 10186968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Burst abdomen and incisional hernia after major gastrointestinal operations--comparison of three closure techniques.
Gislason H; Grønbech JE; Søreide O
Eur J Surg; 1995 May; 161(5):349-54. PubMed ID: 7662780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The figure-of-8 through-and-through monofilament abdominal wound closure with wound splints: elimination of evisceration in poor-risk wounds over 25 years.
Dennis C; Aka E
Surgery; 1973 Feb; 73(2):171-5. PubMed ID: 4265312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Sidewinder retention sutures for closure of the abdominal wall.
Rappaport WD; Putnam C
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1989 Jul; 169(1):73-4. PubMed ID: 2525819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective comparative clinical study between monofilament absorbable and non-absorbable sutures for abdominal wall closure.
Gys T; Hubens A
Acta Chir Belg; 1989; 89(5):265-70. PubMed ID: 2530745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
