These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Stimulus context and absolute magnitude estimation: a study of individual differences. Gescheider GA; Hughson BA Percept Psychophys; 1991 Jul; 50(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 1881765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of simple models of auditory profile analysis using random reference spectra. Kidd G; Mason CR; Uchanski RM; Brantley MA; Shah P J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Sep; 90(3):1340-54. PubMed ID: 1939899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of tones in noise and the "severe departure" from Weber's law. Carlyon RP; Moore BC J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Feb; 79(2):461-4. PubMed ID: 3950199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A test of the binaural equal-loudness-ratio hypothesis for tones. Marozeau J; Epstein M; Florentine M; Daley B J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Dec; 120(6):3870-7. PubMed ID: 17225414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does stimulus context affect loudness or only loudness judgments? Schneider B; Parker S Percept Psychophys; 1990 Nov; 48(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 2247323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Monaural and binaural loudness of 5- and 200-ms tones in normal and impaired hearing. Whilby S; Florentine M; Wagner E; Marozeau J J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jun; 119(6):3931-9. PubMed ID: 16838536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On the relation between the growth of loudness and the discrimination of intensity for pure tones. Hellman R; Scharf B; Teghtsoonian M; Teghtsoonian R J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Aug; 82(2):448-53. PubMed ID: 3624649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnitude estimation and the "paradoxical" loudness of tinnitus. Penner MJ J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Sep; 29(3):407-12. PubMed ID: 3762105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A robust asymmetry in loudness between rising- and falling-intensity tones. Ponsot E; Susini P; Meunier S Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):907-20. PubMed ID: 25609028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The stimulus range effect: evidence for top-down control of sensory intensity in audition. Parker S; Schneider B Percept Psychophys; 1994 Jul; 56(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 8084726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A test of the equal-loudness-ratio hypothesis using cross-modality matching functions. Epstein M; Florentine M J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):907-13. PubMed ID: 16158646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pure-Tone-Spondee Threshold Relationships in Functional Hearing Loss: A Test of Loudness Contribution. Schlauch RS; Han HJ; Yu TJ; Carney E J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Jan; 60(1):136-143. PubMed ID: 27973669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The relation between loudness and intensity difference limens for tones in quiet and noise backgrounds. Rankovic CM; Viemeister NF; Fantini DA; Cheesman MF; Uchiyama CL J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Jul; 84(1):150-5. PubMed ID: 3411042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Frequency selectivity in loudness adaptation and auditory fatigue. Charron S; Botte MC J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Jan; 83(1):178-87. PubMed ID: 3343438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Loudness reduction and adaptation induced by a contralateral tone. Botte MC; Baruch C; Scharf B J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Jul; 80(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 3745668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Temporal integration of loudness, loudness discrimination, and the form of the loudness function. Buus S; Florentine M; Poulsen T J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Feb; 101(2):669-80. PubMed ID: 9035390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]