These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15065363)

  • 1. [Papanicolau smears: reducing the false negative rate by improving the method].
    Biran G; Levy T
    Harefuah; 2004 Mar; 143(3):217-21, 245. PubMed ID: 15065363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ThinPrep Papanicolaou testing to reduce false-negative cervical cytology.
    Linder J; Zahniser D
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Feb; 122(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 9499356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of HPV test versus conventional and automation-assisted Pap screening as potential screening tools for preventing cervical cancer.
    Nieminen P; Vuorma S; Viikki M; Hakama M; Anttila A
    BJOG; 2004 Aug; 111(8):842-8. PubMed ID: 15270934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative cytologic yield and quality of three Pap smear instruments.
    Toffler WL; Pluedeman CK; Sinclair AE; Ireland KM; Byrne BJ
    Fam Med; 1993 Jun; 25(6):403-7. PubMed ID: 8349063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Metaanalysis of the accuracy of rapid prescreening relative to full screening of pap smears.
    Arbyn M; Schenck U; Ellison E; Hanselaar A
    Cancer; 2003 Feb; 99(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 12589640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The PAPNET system in cytological rescreening of cervical smears].
    Cenci M; Nagar C; Giovagnoli MR; Vecchione A
    Minerva Ginecol; 1997 Apr; 49(4):139-45. PubMed ID: 9206764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rapid prescreening of Papanicolaou smears: a practical and efficient quality control strategy.
    Djemli A; Khetani K; Auger M
    Cancer; 2006 Feb; 108(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 16302251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cervical cleaning improves Pap smear quality.
    Kotaska AJ; Matisic JP
    CMAJ; 2003 Sep; 169(7):666-9. PubMed ID: 14517124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of visual inspection and Papanicolau (PAP) smears for cervical cancer screening in Honduras: should PAP smears be abandoned?
    Perkins RB; Langrish SM; Stern LJ; Figueroa J; Simon CJ
    Trop Med Int Health; 2007 Sep; 12(9):1018-25. PubMed ID: 17875013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rapid pre-screening of cervical smears as a method of internal quality control in a cervical screening programme.
    Tavares SB; de Sousa NL; Manrique EJ; de Albuquerque ZB; Zeferino LC; Amaral RG
    Cytopathology; 2008 Aug; 19(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 18476988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer screening.
    Bentz JS
    Expert Rev Mol Diagn; 2005 Nov; 5(6):857-71. PubMed ID: 16255628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Partial re-screening of all negative smears. A method of quality control of pathology department concerning smear screening against cervix cancer].
    Jensen ML; Dybdahl H; Svanholm H
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2000 May; 162(21):3024-7. PubMed ID: 10850190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Early detection of precursors of cervical cancer with cervical cytology and visual inspection of cervix with acetic Acid.
    Dhaubhadel P; Vaidya A; Choudhary P
    JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2008; 47(170):71-6. PubMed ID: 18709035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), Lugol's iodine (VILI), cervical cytology and HPV testing as cervical screening tools in Latin America. This report refers to partial results from the LAMS (Latin AMerican Screening) study.
    Sarian LO; Derchain SF; Naud P; Roteli-Martins C; Longatto-Filho A; Tatti S; Branca M; Erzen M; Serpa-Hammes L; Matos J; Gontijo R; Bragança JF; Lima TP; Maeda MY; Lörincz A; Dores GB; Costa S; Syrjänen S; Syrjänen K
    J Med Screen; 2005; 12(3):142-9. PubMed ID: 16156945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Cytological screening--the technique of cytological specimen taking and its influence on the quality of the method].
    Ivanov S
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2007; 46(8):26-7. PubMed ID: 18642552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved cervical cancer screening in premenopausal women by combination of Pap smear and speculoscopy.
    Twu NF; Chen YJ; Wang PH; Yu BK; Lai CR; Chao KC; Yuan CC; Yen MS
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Jul; 133(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 16797826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Direct-to-vial comparison of a new liquid-based cytology system, liqui-PREP versus the conventional pap smear.
    Park J; Jung EH; Kim C; Choi YH
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Aug; 35(8):488-92. PubMed ID: 17636495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality and liability issues with the Papanicolaou smear: the problem of definition of errors and false-negative smears.
    Davey DD
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):267-9. PubMed ID: 9111115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neural network processing of cervical smears can lead to a decrease in diagnostic variability and an increase in screening efficacy: a study of 63 false-negative smears.
    Boon ME; Kok LP; Nygaard-Nielsen M; Holm K; Holund B
    Mod Pathol; 1994 Dec; 7(9):957-61. PubMed ID: 7892166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cervical cancer screening with pattern of pap smear. Review of multicenter studies.
    Altaf FJ
    Saudi Med J; 2006 Oct; 27(10):1498-502. PubMed ID: 17013471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.