561 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15065913)
1. A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time.
Ratcliff R; Smith PL
Psychol Rev; 2004 Apr; 111(2):333-67. PubMed ID: 15065913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modeling 2-alternative forced-choice tasks: Accounting for both magnitude and difference effects.
Ratcliff R; Voskuilen C; Teodorescu A
Cogn Psychol; 2018 Jun; 103():1-22. PubMed ID: 29501775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of macaque behavior and superior colliculus neuronal activity to predictions from models of two-choice decisions.
Ratcliff R; Cherian A; Segraves M
J Neurophysiol; 2003 Sep; 90(3):1392-407. PubMed ID: 12761282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Parameter variability and distributional assumptions in the diffusion model.
Ratcliff R
Psychol Rev; 2013 Jan; 120(1):281-92. PubMed ID: 23148742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sequential sampling models with variable boundaries and non-normal noise: A comparison of six models.
Voss A; Lerche V; Mertens U; Voss J
Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Jun; 26(3):813-832. PubMed ID: 30652240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multi-attribute, multi-alternative models of choice: Choice, reaction time, and process tracing.
Cohen AL; Kang N; Leise TL
Cogn Psychol; 2017 Nov; 98():45-72. PubMed ID: 28843070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modeling reaction time and accuracy of multiple-alternative decisions.
Leite FP; Ratcliff R
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jan; 72(1):246-73. PubMed ID: 20045893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The EZ diffusion method: too EZ?
Ratcliff R
Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Dec; 15(6):1218-28. PubMed ID: 19001593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diffusive information accumulation by minimal recurrent neural models of decision making.
Smith PL; McKenzie CR
Neural Comput; 2011 Aug; 23(8):2000-31. PubMed ID: 21521041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An integrated model of choices and response times in absolute identification.
Brown SD; Marley AA; Donkin C; Heathcote A
Psychol Rev; 2008 Apr; 115(2):396-425. PubMed ID: 18426295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. "Reliable organisms from unreliable components" revisited: the linear drift, linear infinitesimal variance model of decision making.
Smith PL
Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Aug; 30(4):1323-1359. PubMed ID: 36720804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On the Relation Between the (Censored) Shifted Wald and the Wiener Distribution as Measurement Models for Choice Response Times.
Miller R; Scherbaum S; Heck DW; Goschke T; Enge S
Appl Psychol Meas; 2018 Mar; 42(2):116-135. PubMed ID: 29881116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Unfalsifiability and mutual translatability of major modeling schemes for choice reaction time.
Jones M; Dzhafarov EN
Psychol Rev; 2014 Jan; 121(1):1-32. PubMed ID: 24079307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sequential sampling model for multiattribute choice alternatives with random attention time and processing order.
Diederich A; Oswald P
Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():697. PubMed ID: 25249963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Time-varying boundaries for diffusion models of decision making and response time.
Zhang S; Lee MD; Vandekerckhove J; Maris G; Wagenmakers EJ
Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1364. PubMed ID: 25538642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can post-error dynamics explain sequential reaction time patterns?
Goldfarb S; Wong-Lin K; Schwemmer M; Leonard NE; Holmes P
Front Psychol; 2012; 3():213. PubMed ID: 22811671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The overconstraint of response time models: rethinking the scaling problem.
Donkin C; Brown SD; Heathcote A
Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Dec; 16(6):1129-35. PubMed ID: 19966267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The drift diffusion model as the choice rule in inter-temporal and risky choice: A case study in medial orbitofrontal cortex lesion patients and controls.
Peters J; D'Esposito M
PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Apr; 16(4):e1007615. PubMed ID: 32310962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sequential sampling models without random between-trial variability: the racing diffusion model of speeded decision making.
Tillman G; Van Zandt T; Logan GD
Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Oct; 27(5):911-936. PubMed ID: 32424622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A further test of sequential-sampling models that account for payoff effects on response bias in perceptual decision tasks.
Diederich A
Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):229-56. PubMed ID: 18372746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
