These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15066499)

  • 1. Correct coding for laboratory procedures during assisted reproductive technology cycles.
    Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Apr; 81(4):1168-71. PubMed ID: 15066499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correct coding for laboratory procedures during assisted reproductive technology cycles.
    Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Nov; 86(5 Suppl 1):S168-71. PubMed ID: 17055815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correct coding for laboratory procedures during assisted reproductive technology cycles.
    Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Sep; 82 Suppl 1():S51-4. PubMed ID: 15363694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correct coding for laboratory procedures during assisted reproductive technology cycles.
    Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Nov; 90(5 Suppl):S202-5. PubMed ID: 19007631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correct coding for laboratory procedures during assisted reproductive technology cycles.
    Coding Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
    Fertil Steril; 2012 Oct; 98(4):808-11. PubMed ID: 22789141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2001 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry.
    ;
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Jun; 87(6):1253-66. PubMed ID: 17276436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relative contribution of assisted reproductive technologies and ovulation induction to multiple births in the United States 5 years after the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology/American Society for Reproductive Medicine recommendation to limit the number of embryos transferred.
    Dickey RP
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Dec; 88(6):1554-61. PubMed ID: 17481621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2000 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry.
    ;
    Fertil Steril; 2004 May; 81(5):1207-20. PubMed ID: 15136079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The International Committee Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ICMART) glossary on ART terminology.
    Zegers-Hochschild F; Nygren KG; Adamson GD; de Mouzon J; Lancaster P; Mansour R; Sullivan E;
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Jul; 86(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 16762350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correct coding for laboratory procedures during assisted reproductive technology cycles.
    Coding Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Apr; 105(4):e5-8. PubMed ID: 26746136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assisted reproductive technology practice patterns and the impact of embryo transfer guidelines in the United States.
    Stern JE; Cedars MI; Jain T; Klein NA; Beaird CM; Grainger DA; Gibbons WE;
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Aug; 88(2):275-82. PubMed ID: 17445805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interventional pain management: evolving issues for 2003.
    Manchikanti L; Singh V
    Pain Physician; 2003 Jan; 6(1):125-37. PubMed ID: 16878168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CPT coding update for 2003.
    Moore KJ
    Fam Pract Manag; 2003 Jan; 10(1):14. PubMed ID: 12577871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Guidelines on number of embryos transferred.
    ;
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Nov; 92(5):1518-9. PubMed ID: 19836732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CPT coding by interventional radiologists: a multi-institutional evaluation of accuracy and its economic implications.
    Duszak R; Blackham WC; Kusiak GM; Majchrzak J
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Oct; 1(10):734-40. PubMed ID: 17411693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A formal comparison of the practice of assisted reproductive technologies between Europe and the USA.
    Gleicher N; Weghofer A; Barad D
    Hum Reprod; 2006 Aug; 21(8):1945-50. PubMed ID: 16690628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assisted reproductive technologies are an integrated part of national strategies addressing demographic and reproductive challenges.
    Ziebe S; Devroey P;
    Hum Reprod Update; 2008; 14(6):583-92. PubMed ID: 18786951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dutch translation of the ICMART-WHO revised glossary on ART terminology.
    De Neubourg D; van Duijnhoven NT; Nelen WL; D'Hooghe TM
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2012; 74(3):233-48. PubMed ID: 23146953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A survey of the practices and opinions of the domestic members of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
    Keye WR; Bradshaw KD;
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Sep; 82(3):536-42. PubMed ID: 15374686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of United States fertility clinic websites according to the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM)/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) guidelines.
    Abusief ME; Hornstein MD; Jain T; ;
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Jan; 87(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 17081534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.