232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15066928)
1. On-schedule mammography rescreening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.
Bobo JK; Shapiro JA; Schulman J; Wolters CL
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 Apr; 13(4):620-30. PubMed ID: 15066928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Strategies for providing follow-up and treatment services in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program--United States, 1997.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1998 Mar; 47(11):215-8. PubMed ID: 9551882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of women's experiences during mammography on adherence to rescreening (United States).
Peipins LA; Shapiro JA; Bobo JK; Berkowitz Z
Cancer Causes Control; 2006 May; 17(4):439-47. PubMed ID: 16596296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Meeting the cervical cancer screening needs of underserved women: the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 2004-2006.
Tangka FK; O'Hara B; Gardner JG; Turner J; Royalty J; Shaw K; Sabatino S; Hall IJ; Coates RJ
Cancer Causes Control; 2010 Jul; 21(7):1081-90. PubMed ID: 20361353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast and cervical cancer screening among Latinas attending culturally specific educational programs.
Jandorf L; Bursac Z; Pulley L; Trevino M; Castillo A; Erwin DO
Prog Community Health Partnersh; 2008; 2(3):195-204. PubMed ID: 20208198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Smoking and cancer screening for women ages 42-75: associations in the 1990-1994 National Health Interview Surveys.
Rakowski W; Clark MA; Ehrich B
Prev Med; 1999 Dec; 29(6 Pt 1):487-95. PubMed ID: 10600429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Another round in the mammography controversy.
Meissner HI; Rimer BK; Davis WW; Eisner EJ; Siegler IC
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2003 Apr; 12(3):261-76. PubMed ID: 12804357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Women's mammography experience and its impact on screening adherence.
Tang TS; Patterson SK; Roubidoux MA; Duan L
Psychooncology; 2009 Jul; 18(7):727-34. PubMed ID: 19035468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differences in predictors of cervical and breast cancer screening by screening need in uninsured Latino women.
Buki LP; Jamison J; Anderson CJ; Cuadra AM
Cancer; 2007 Oct; 110(7):1578-85. PubMed ID: 17696119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimating personal costs incurred by a woman participating in mammography screening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.
Ekwueme DU; Hall IJ; Richardson LC; Gardner JG; Royalty J; Thompson TD
Cancer; 2008 Aug; 113(3):592-601. PubMed ID: 18536027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors affecting follow-up among low-income women with breast abnormalities.
Kaplan CP; Crane LA; Stewart S; Juarez-Reyes M
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2004 Mar; 13(2):195-206. PubMed ID: 15072734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CAPRELA (Cancer Prevention for Latinas): findings of a pilot study in Winston-Salem, Forsyth County.
Koval AE; Riganti AA; Foley KL
N C Med J; 2006; 67(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 16550986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Physician recommendation for papanicolaou testing among U.S. women, 2000.
Coughlin SS; Breslau ES; Thompson T; Benard VB
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 May; 14(5):1143-8. PubMed ID: 15894664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Report from the CDC. Pap test intervals used by physicians serving low-income women through the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.
Cooper CP; Saraiya M; McLean TA; Hannan J; Liesmann JM; Rose SW; Lawson HW
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2005 Oct; 14(8):670-8. PubMed ID: 16232098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Late-stage breast cancer among women with recent negative screening mammography: do clinical encounters offer opportunity for earlier detection?
Mouchawar J; Taplin S; Ichikawa L; Barlow WE; Geiger AM; Weinmann S; Gilbert J; Manos MM; Ulcickas Yood M
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2005; (35):39-46. PubMed ID: 16287884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comprehensive breast and cervical cancer screening program for medically underserved women in Connecticut.
McCooey L; Mitchell PP; Parker CB; Simpson J
Conn Med; 1999 Jan; 63(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 10071434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast and cervical cancer screening among low-income women in Nebraska: findings from the Every Woman Matters program, 1993-2004.
Feresu SA; Zhang W; Puumala SE; Ullrich F; Anderson JR
J Health Care Poor Underserved; 2008 Aug; 19(3):797-813. PubMed ID: 18677071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What factors are associated with diagnostic follow-up after abnormal mammograms? Findings from a U.S. National Survey.
Yabroff KR; Breen N; Vernon SW; Meissner HI; Freedman AN; Ballard-Barbash R
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 May; 13(5):723-32. PubMed ID: 15159302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The 2003 Australian Breast Health Survey: survey design and preliminary results.
Villanueva EV; Jones S; Nehill C; Favelle S; Steel D; Iverson D; Zorbas H
BMC Public Health; 2008 Jan; 8():13. PubMed ID: 18194528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Variability in the timing of repeat screening mammography.
Jepson C; Barudin JL; Weiner JR
Prev Med; 1997; 26(4):483-5. PubMed ID: 9245670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
