These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15067256)

  • 1. Variation in Class II malocclusion: comparison of Mexican mestizos and American whites.
    Phelan T; Buschang PH; Behrents RG; Wintergerst AM; Ceen RF; Hernandez A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Apr; 125(4):418-25. PubMed ID: 15067256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dentoskeletal morphology in adults with Class I, Class II Division 1, or Class II Division 2 malocclusion with increased overbite.
    Uzuner FD; Aslan BI; Dinçer M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Aug; 156(2):248-256.e2. PubMed ID: 31375235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dental and facial skeletal characteristics and growth of males and females with class II, division 1 malocclusion between the ages of 10 and 14 (revisited)-part I: characteristics of size, form, and position.
    Rothstein T; Yoon-Tarlie C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Mar; 117(3):320-32. PubMed ID: 10715092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Longitudinal cephalometric growth of untreated subjects with Class II Division 2 malocclusion.
    Barbosa LAG; Araujo E; Behrents RG; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 May; 151(5):914-920. PubMed ID: 28457269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cephalometric morphology of Chinese with Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Lau JW; Hägg U
    Br Dent J; 1999 Feb; 186(4 Spec No):188-90. PubMed ID: 10205956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Molar heights and incisor inclinations in adults with Class II and Class III skeletal open-bite malocclusions.
    Arriola-Guillén LE; Flores-Mir C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 24582024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cephalometric evaluation of nongrowing females with skeletal and dental Class II, division 1 malocclusion.
    Sayin MO; Türkkahraman H
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Jul; 75(4):656-60. PubMed ID: 16097237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Cephalometric comparisons of the craniofacial characteristics of Class II 1 malocclusions with different vertical types in adolescences].
    Ye Q; Zhao ZH; Zhao MY
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2006 Aug; 15(4):370-4. PubMed ID: 16955160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intermaxillary tooth-size discrepancies in different sexes, malocclusion groups, and ethnicities.
    Johe RS; Steinhart T; Sado N; Greenberg B; Jing S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):599-607. PubMed ID: 21055600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A mixed longitudinal anthropometric study of craniofacial growth of Colombian mestizos 6-17 years of age.
    Arboleda C; Buschang PH; Camacho JA; Botero P; Roldan S
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):441-9. PubMed ID: 21097992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variation in maxillary and mandibular molar and incisor vertical dimension in 12-year-old subjects with excess, normal, and short lower anterior face height.
    Janson GR; Metaxas A; Woodside DG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Oct; 106(4):409-18. PubMed ID: 7942657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Craniofacial patterns of Japanese adults with various types of malocclusion: a counterpart analysis.
    Oka T; Kawamoto T
    J Osaka Dent Univ; 1994 Dec; 28(1-2):1-16. PubMed ID: 8935067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tooth size discrepancies and arch parameters among different malocclusions in a Jordanian sample.
    Al-Khateeb SN; Abu Alhaija ES
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):459-65. PubMed ID: 16637727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Components of adult Class II open-bite malocclusion.
    Ellis E; McNamara JA; Lawrence TM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1985 Feb; 43(2):92-105. PubMed ID: 3855459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differences in dental arch morphology among adult females with untreated Class I and Class II malocclusion.
    Buschang PH; Stroud J; Alexander RG
    Eur J Orthod; 1994 Feb; 16(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 8181550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mandibular changes in persons with untreated and treated Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Bishara SE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jun; 113(6):661-73. PubMed ID: 9637570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A method of measuring the apical base.
    Sergl HG; Kerr WJ; McColl JH
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Oct; 18(5):479-83. PubMed ID: 8942097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative cephalometric study of Class II division 1 malocclusion between Lithuanian and Jordanian females.
    Bader BA; Vasiliauskas A; Qadri AS
    Stomatologija; 2008; 10(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 18493165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Treatment effects produced by Fränkel appliance in patients with class II, division 1 malocclusion.
    Rodrigues de Almeida M; Castanha Henriques JF; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Ursi W
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):418-25. PubMed ID: 12401050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.