These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15067261)

  • 1. Treatment outcomes of growing Class II Division 1 patients with varying degrees of anteroposterior and vertical dysplasias, Part 1. Cephalometrics.
    Fogle LL; Southard KA; Southard TE; Casko JS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Apr; 125(4):450-6. PubMed ID: 15067261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Treatment outcomes of growing Class II Division 1 patients with varying degrees of anteroposterior and vertical dysplasias, Part 2. Profile silhouette evaluation.
    Mergen JL; Southard KA; Dawson DV; Fogle LL; Casko JS; Southard TE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Apr; 125(4):457-62. PubMed ID: 15067262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Treatment of growing Class II division 1 patients with varying degrees of anteroposterior and vertical dysplasias].
    Yang YM; Chen LL; Liao Q
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2011 Jun; 20(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 21779739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
    Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of skeletal and dental pattern of Class II division 1 malocclusion with relevance to clinical practice.
    Sidlauskas A; Svalkauskiene V; Sidlauskas M
    Stomatologija; 2006; 8(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 16687908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.
    Sharma AK; Sachdev V; Singla A; Kirtaniya BC
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of cervical headgear on patients with high or low mandibular plane angles and the "myth" of posterior mandibular rotation.
    Haralabakis NB; Sifakakis IB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Sep; 126(3):310-7. PubMed ID: 15356494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dentoskeletal effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy.
    Baysal A; Uysal T
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Apr; 36(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 24663007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of differential growth and orthodontic treatment outcome by regional cephalometric superpositions.
    Efstratiadis SS; Cohen G; Ghafari J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Jun; 69(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 10371427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nonextraction treatment of severe Class II, division 2 malocclusions. Part 2.
    Arvystas MG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Jan; 99(1):74-84. PubMed ID: 1986530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes during activator therapy.
    Cozza P; De Toffol L; Colagrossi S
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Jun; 26(3):293-302. PubMed ID: 15222715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prospective controlled evaluation of Class II division 1 malocclusions treated with fixed lingual mandibular growth modificator.
    Alali OH
    Angle Orthod; 2014 May; 84(3):527-33. PubMed ID: 23987240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Skeletal and dental changes with nonextraction Begg mechanotherapy in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Reddy P; Kharbanda OP; Duggal R; Parkash H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Dec; 118(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 11113799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treatment effects produced by the Bionator appliance. Comparison with an untreated Class II sample.
    Almeida MR; Henriques JF; Almeida RR; Almeida-Pedrin RR; Ursi W
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Feb; 26(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 14994884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A cephalometric study of Class II malocclusions treated with mandibular surgery.
    Burden D; Johnston C; Kennedy D; Harradine N; Stevenson M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):7.e1-8. PubMed ID: 17208097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An evaluation of maxillary and mandibular rotational responses with the Clark twin block appliance.
    Lau EY; Sampson WJ; Townsend GC; Hughes T
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 19634464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mandibular changes in persons with untreated and treated Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Bishara SE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jun; 113(6):661-73. PubMed ID: 9637570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation.
    VanLaecken R; Martin CA; Dischinger T; Razmus T; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 17110255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.
    Marure PS; Patil RU; Reddy S; Prakash A; Kshetrimayum N; Shukla R
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.