BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15067283)

  • 1. An experimental comparison of 3-dimensional and 2-dimensional endoscopic systems in a model.
    Thomsen MN; Lang RD
    Arthroscopy; 2004 Apr; 20(4):419-23. PubMed ID: 15067283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monitoring with head-mounted displays: performance and safety in a full-scale simulator and part-task trainer.
    Liu D; Jenkins SA; Sanderson PM; Watson MO; Leane T; Kruys A; Russell WJ
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Oct; 109(4):1135-46. PubMed ID: 19762741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 3-D video techniques in endoscopic surgery.
    Becker H; Melzer A; Schurr MO; Buess G
    Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1993 Feb; 1(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 8050009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance evaluation of stereo endoscopic imaging system incorporating TFT-LCD.
    Song CG; Park SK
    J Med Eng Technol; 2005; 29(5):244-50. PubMed ID: 16126586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of haptic learning in telemanipulator-assisted surgery.
    Jacobs S; Holzhey D; Strauss G; Burgert O; Falk V
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2007 Oct; 17(5):402-6. PubMed ID: 18049401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Image-navigated endoscopic surgery: introduction of the face-mounted display system with picture-in-picture capabilities.
    Yoshida T; Inoue H; Kumagai Y; Iwai T
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2000; 47(32):375-7. PubMed ID: 10791193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of three-dimensional vision on surgical telemanipulator performance.
    Falk V; Mintz D; Grünenfelder J; Fann JI; Burdon TA
    Surg Endosc; 2001 Nov; 15(11):1282-8. PubMed ID: 11727134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 3-D vision improves performance in a pelvic trainer.
    Tevaearai HT; Mueller XM; von Segesser LK
    Endoscopy; 2000 Jun; 32(6):464-8. PubMed ID: 10863913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A controlled laboratory and clinical evaluation of a three-dimensional endoscope for endonasal sinus and skull base surgery.
    Shah RN; Leight WD; Patel MR; Surowitz JB; Wong YT; Wheless SA; Germanwala AV; Zanation AM
    Am J Rhinol Allergy; 2011; 25(3):141-4. PubMed ID: 21679524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A novel prototype for an optical see-through head-mounted display with addressable focus cues.
    Liu S; Hua H; Cheng D
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2010; 16(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 20224134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Advanced auditory displays and head-mounted displays: advantages and disadvantages for monitoring by the distracted anesthesiologist.
    Sanderson PM; Watson MO; Russell WJ; Jenkins S; Liu D; Green N; Llewelyn K; Cole P; Shek V; Krupenia SS
    Anesth Analg; 2008 Jun; 106(6):1787-97. PubMed ID: 18499611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-dimensional high-definition neuroendoscopic surgery: a controlled comparative laboratory study with two-dimensional endoscopy and clinical application.
    Inoue D; Yoshimoto K; Uemura M; Yoshida M; Ohuchida K; Kenmotsu H; Tomikawa M; Sasaki T; Hashizume M
    J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2013 Nov; 74(6):357-65. PubMed ID: 23888482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The benefits of stereoscopic vision in robotic-assisted performance on bench models.
    Munz Y; Moorthy K; Dosis A; Hernandez JD; Bann S; Bello F; Martin S; Darzi A; Rockall T
    Surg Endosc; 2004 Apr; 18(4):611-6. PubMed ID: 14752629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison between three-dimensional presentation of endoscopic procedures with polarization glasses and an autostereoscopic display.
    Mueller-Richter UD; Limberger A; Weber P; Spitzer W; Schilling M
    Surg Endosc; 2003 Mar; 17(3):502-4. PubMed ID: 12399850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [A head-mounted display system for augmented reality: initial evaluation for interventional MRI].
    Wendt M; Sauer F; Khamene A; Bascle B; Vogt S; Wacker FK
    Rofo; 2003 Mar; 175(3):418-21. PubMed ID: 12635021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of skill training with robotic systems and traditional endoscopy: implications on training and adoption.
    Maniar HS; Council ML; Prasad SM; Prasad SM; Chu C; Damiano RJ
    J Surg Res; 2005 May; 125(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 15836846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Real-time 3D human capture system for mixed-reality art and entertainment.
    Nguyen TH; Qui TC; Xu K; Cheok AD; Teo SL; Zhou Z; Mallawaarachchi A; Lee SP; Liu W; Teo HS; Thang le N; Li Y; Kato H
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2005; 11(6):706-21. PubMed ID: 16270863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparative study of endoscopic 2-D and 3-D imaging systems].
    van Bergen P; Kunert W; Schurr MO; Buess GF
    Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd; 1996; 113():634-7. PubMed ID: 9101956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. TORNADO: omnistereo video imaging with rotating optics.
    Tanaka K; Tachi S
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2005; 11(6):614-25. PubMed ID: 16270855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-dimensional (3-D) video systems: bi-channel or single-channel optics?
    van Bergen P; Kunert W; Buess GF
    Endoscopy; 1999 Nov; 31(9):732-7. PubMed ID: 10604615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.