153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15067928)
1. Abortion decisions and the duty to screen: clinical, ethical, and legal implications of predictive risk factors of post-abortion maladjustment.
Reardon DC
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2003; 20(1):33-114. PubMed ID: 15067928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Abortion and postabortion care: ethical, legal, and policy issues in developing countries.
Miller S; Billings DL
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2005; 50(4):341-3. PubMed ID: 15973273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using bioethics discourse to determine when parents should make health care decisions for their children: is deference justified?
Rosato JL
Temple Law Rev; 2000; 73(1):1-68. PubMed ID: 12449931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Philippines rolls back advancements in the postabortion care policy.
Upreti M; Jacob J
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2018 Aug; 142(2):255-256. PubMed ID: 29745972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Abortion consent law before Ind. legislature: doctor would say conception begins life.
Martin D
Washington Post; 2006 Feb; ():A10. PubMed ID: 16502549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [The mature minor's decisions' in health].
Peiró Peiró AM
Med Clin (Barc); 2011 Jun; 137(3):140-1. PubMed ID: 21296367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Procreative torts: enhancing the common-law protection for reproductive autonomy.
Northern KS
Univ Ill Law Rev; 1998; 1998(2):489-546. PubMed ID: 12774812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Wrongful abortion: a wrong in search of a remedy.
Perry R; Adar Y
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2005; 5(2):507-86. PubMed ID: 16052894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Caesarean delivery: conflicting interests.
Osuna E; Pérez Cárceles MD; Sánchez Ferrer ML; Machado F
Reprod Biomed Online; 2015 Dec; 31(6):815-8. PubMed ID: 26371711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Abortion among adolescents.
Adler NE; Ozer EJ; Tschann J
Am Psychol; 2003 Mar; 58(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 12772427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Informed decision making and abortion: crisis pregnancy centers, informed consent, and the first amendment.
Ahmed A
J Law Med Ethics; 2015; 43(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 25846038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ethical aspects concerning termination of pregnancy following prenatal diagnosis.
FIGO Committee for the Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction and Women's Health
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2008 Jul; 102(1):97-8. PubMed ID: 18423641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Legal protection of informed consent of minors.
Osuna E
Med Law; 2010 Jun; 29(2):217-26. PubMed ID: 22462286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Teenage abortion in Germany: with reference to the legal system in the United States.
Belling DW; Eberl C
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1996; 12(2):475-502. PubMed ID: 8666732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Access to abortion pared at state level.
Connolly C
Washington Post; 2005 Aug; ():A1, A4. PubMed ID: 16514735
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of minors' and adults' pregnancy decisions.
Lewis CC
Am J Orthopsychiatry; 1980 Jul; 50(3):446-453. PubMed ID: 7406029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The paradox of disability in abortion debates: bringing the pro-choice and disability rights communities together.
Jesudason S; Epstein J
Contraception; 2011 Dec; 84(6):541-3. PubMed ID: 22078180
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The federal government and academic texts as barriers to informed consent.
Lanfranchi A
Issues Law Med; 2008; 24(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 18771039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reproductive Health Services v. Webster, 17 March 1987, amended on 30 April 1987.
United States. District Court, Western District of Missouri
Annu Rev Popul Law; 1987; 14():43-4. PubMed ID: 12346730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Legal briefing: informed consent in the clinical context.
Pope TM; Hexum M
J Clin Ethics; 2014; 25(2):152-75. PubMed ID: 24972066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
