These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15068367)

  • 1. Comparison of correlation vector methods for ligand-based similarity searching.
    Fechner U; Franke L; Renner S; Schneider P; Schneider G
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2003 Oct; 17(10):687-98. PubMed ID: 15068367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of similarity measures in 2D fragment-based similarity searching: comparison of structural descriptors and similarity coefficients.
    Chen X; Reynolds CH
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2002; 42(6):1407-14. PubMed ID: 12444738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling Tanimoto Similarity Value Distributions and Predicting Search Results.
    Vogt M; Bajorath J
    Mol Inform; 2017 Jul; 36(7):. PubMed ID: 28032955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Chemical similarity searches using latent semantic structural indexing (LaSSI) and comparison to TOPOSIM.
    Hull RD; Fluder EM; Singh SB; Nachbar RB; Kearsley SK; Sheridan RP
    J Med Chem; 2001 Apr; 44(8):1185-91. PubMed ID: 11312918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How similar are similarity searching methods? A principal component analysis of molecular descriptor space.
    Bender A; Jenkins JL; Scheiber J; Sukuru SC; Glick M; Davies JW
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jan; 49(1):108-19. PubMed ID: 19123924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Similarity searching of chemical databases using atom environment descriptors (MOLPRINT 2D): evaluation of performance.
    Bender A; Mussa HY; Glen RC; Reiling S
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(5):1708-18. PubMed ID: 15446830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Potency-directed similarity searching using support vector machines.
    Wassermann AM; Heikamp K; Bajorath J
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2011 Jan; 77(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 21114788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Virtual screening data fusion using both structure- and ligand-based methods.
    Svensson F; Karlén A; Sköld C
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Jan; 52(1):225-32. PubMed ID: 22148635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of ligand- and structure-based virtual screening on the DUD data set.
    von Korff M; Freyss J; Sander T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Feb; 49(2):209-31. PubMed ID: 19434824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determination and mapping of activity-specific descriptor value ranges for the identification of active compounds.
    Eckert H; Bajorath J
    J Med Chem; 2006 Apr; 49(7):2284-93. PubMed ID: 16570925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. FieldChopper, a new tool for automatic model generation and virtual screening based on molecular fields.
    Kalliokoski T; Ronkko T; Poso A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Jun; 48(6):1131-7. PubMed ID: 18489083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigating the extension of pairwise distance pharmacophore measures to triplet-based descriptors.
    Good AC; Kuntz ID
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 1995 Aug; 9(4):373-9. PubMed ID: 8523046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selecting optimally diverse compounds from structure databases: a validation study of two-dimensional and three-dimensional molecular descriptors.
    Matter H
    J Med Chem; 1997 Apr; 40(8):1219-29. PubMed ID: 9111296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of conformational flexibility on three-dimensional similarity searching using correlation vectors.
    Renner S; Schwab CH; Gasteiger J; Schneider G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2324-32. PubMed ID: 17125176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. SitePrint: three-dimensional pharmacophore descriptors derived from protein binding sites for family based active site analysis, classification, and drug design.
    Arnold JR; Burdick KW; Pegg SC; Toba S; Lamb ML; Kuntz ID
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(6):2190-8. PubMed ID: 15554689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Parameterization and conformational sampling effects in pharmacophore multiplet searching.
    Fox PC; Wolohan PR; Abrahamian E; Clark RD
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Dec; 48(12):2326-34. PubMed ID: 19053520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Similarity metrics for ligands reflecting the similarity of the target proteins.
    Schuffenhauer A; Floersheim P; Acklin P; Jacoby E
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(2):391-405. PubMed ID: 12653501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fighting high molecular weight in bioactive molecules with sub-pharmacophore-based virtual screening.
    von Korff M; Freyss J; Sander T; Boss C; Ciana CL
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Feb; 52(2):380-90. PubMed ID: 22251316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-Dimensional Biologically Relevant Spectrum (BRS-3D): Shape Similarity Profile Based on PDB Ligands as Molecular Descriptors.
    Hu B; Kuang ZK; Feng SY; Wang D; He SB; Kong DX
    Molecules; 2016 Nov; 21(11):. PubMed ID: 27869685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. mRAISE: an alternative algorithmic approach to ligand-based virtual screening.
    von Behren MM; Bietz S; Nittinger E; Rarey M
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Aug; 30(8):583-94. PubMed ID: 27565795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.