These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1506843)

  • 1. Changing-loudness aftereffect following simulated movement: implications for channel hypotheses concerning sound level change and movement.
    Reinhardt-Rutland AH
    J Gen Psychol; 1992 Apr; 119(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 1506843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Note on aftereffect of unidirectional sound-level change with different durations of test stimulus.
    Reinhardt-Rutland AH
    Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Apr; 70(2):635-8. PubMed ID: 2342868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The spectrally dependent monotic component in the decreasing-loudness aftereffect: implications for dynamic auditory localization.
    Reinhardt-Rutland AH
    J Gen Psychol; 2001 Jan; 128(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 11277446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interaural transfer of aftereffect of changing sound level in a tone.
    Reinhardt-Rutland AH
    J Gen Psychol; 1988 Jan; 115(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 3351490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Aftereffect arising from unidirectional change of sound level in a tone: frequency specificity with a complex adaptor.
    Reinhardt-Rutland AH
    J Gen Psychol; 1990 Apr; 117(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 2366051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Increasing- and decreasing-loudness aftereffects: asymmetrical functions for absolute rate of sound level change in adapting stimulus.
    Reinhardt-Rutland AH
    J Gen Psychol; 1995 Apr; 122(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 7790848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of onset sound level of test stimulus on reported magnitude of changing-loudness aftereffects.
    Reinhardt-Rutland AH
    J Gen Psychol; 1995 Jul; 122(3):295-303. PubMed ID: 7650523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Increasing-loudness aftereffect following decreasing-intensity adaptation: spectral dependence in interotic and monotic testing.
    Reinhardt-Rutland AH
    Perception; 1998; 27(4):473-82. PubMed ID: 9797925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence for frequency-dependent and frequency-independent components in increasing- and decreasing-loudness aftereffects.
    Reinhardt-Rutland AH
    J Gen Psychol; 1995 Jan; 122(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 7714505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Loudness adaptation measured by the simultaneous dichotic loudness balance technique differs between genders.
    D'Alessandro LM; Norwich KH
    Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(2):122-7. PubMed ID: 19027058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The illusion of increasing loudness in brief steady tones: variation with carrier frequency.
    Reinhardt-Rutland AH
    J Gen Psychol; 1996 Oct; 123(4):325-32. PubMed ID: 9042742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual asymmetries associated with changing-loudness aftereffects.
    Reinhardt-Rutland AH
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Aug; 66(6):963-9. PubMed ID: 15675644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The growing-louder effect in short diotic stimuli.
    Reinhardt-Rutland AH; Ehrenstein WH
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Aug; 83(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 8873174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monaural loudness adaptation for middle-intensity middle-frequency signals: the importance of measurement technique.
    Tannen RS; Weiler EM; Warm JS; Dember WN; Simon JO
    J Gen Psychol; 2001 Oct; 128(4):385-99. PubMed ID: 11892887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Magnitude judgments of loudness change for discrete, dynamic, and hybrid stimuli.
    Pastore RE; Flint J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Apr; 73(3):886-907. PubMed ID: 21264709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Binaural summation after learning psychophysical functions for loudness.
    Marks LE; Galanter E; Baird JC
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 Nov; 57(8):1209-16. PubMed ID: 8539096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [A dynamic model of loudness adaptation].
    Hübner R
    Z Psychol Z Angew Psychol; 1989; 197(1):97-107. PubMed ID: 2568038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monaural and binaural adaptation in sequence: SDLB analogue?
    Weiler EM; Cobb F; Sandman D; Pederson L
    J Aud Res; 1985 Jul; 25(3):149-59. PubMed ID: 3842839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Loudness adaptation, when induced, is real.
    Canévet G; Scharf B; Botte MC
    Br J Audiol; 1983 Feb; 17(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 6860822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of target-masker similarity on across-ear interference in a dichotic cocktail-party listening task.
    Brungart DS; Simpson BD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1724. PubMed ID: 17927432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.