1022 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15068502)
21. Comparison of six calcaneal quantitative ultrasound devices: precision and hip fracture discrimination.
Njeh CF; Hans D; Li J; Fan B; Fuerst T; He YQ; Tsuda-Futami E; Lu Y; Wu CY; Genant HK
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(12):1051-62. PubMed ID: 11256897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of three bone ultrasounds for the discrimination of subjects with and without osteoporotic fractures among 7562 elderly women.
Krieg MA; Cornuz J; Ruffieux C; Sandini L; Büche D; Dambacher MA; Hartl F; Häuselmann HJ; Kraenzlin M; Lippuner K; Neff M; Pancaldi P; Rizzoli R; Tanzi F; Theiler R; Tyndall A; Wimpfheimer K; Burckhardt P
J Bone Miner Res; 2003 Jul; 18(7):1261-6. PubMed ID: 12854836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Can the WHO criteria for diagnosing osteoporosis be applied to calcaneal quantitative ultrasound?
Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 10928222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Quantitative ultrasound of the heel and fracture risk assessment: an updated meta-analysis.
Moayyeri A; Adams JE; Adler RA; Krieg MA; Hans D; Compston J; Lewiecki EM
Osteoporos Int; 2012 Jan; 23(1):143-53. PubMed ID: 22037972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prospective identification of postmenopausal osteoporotic women at high vertebral fracture risk by radiography, bone densitometry, quantitative ultrasound, and laboratory findings: results from the PIOS study.
Glüer MG; Minne HW; Glüer CC; Lazarescu AD; Pfeifer M; Perschel FH; Fitzner R; Pollähne W; Schlotthauer T; Pospeschill M
J Clin Densitom; 2005; 8(4):386-95. PubMed ID: 16311422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Device-specific thresholds to diagnose osteoporosis at the proximal femur: an approach to interpreting peripheral bone measurements in clinical practice.
Clowes JA; Peel NF; Eastell R
Osteoporos Int; 2006; 17(9):1293-302. PubMed ID: 16810454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparisons of noninvasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination, and diagnostic classification.
Grampp S; Genant HK; Mathur A; Lang P; Jergas M; Takada M; Glüer CC; Lu Y; Chavez M
J Bone Miner Res; 1997 May; 12(5):697-711. PubMed ID: 9144335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Quantitative Ultrasound (QUS) in the Management of Osteoporosis and Assessment of Fracture Risk.
Hans D; Baim S
J Clin Densitom; 2017; 20(3):322-333. PubMed ID: 28739081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Efficiency of quantitative ultrasound measurements as compared with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the assessment of corticosteroid-induced bone impairment.
Daens S; Peretz A; de Maertelaer V; Moris M; Bergmann P
Osteoporos Int; 1999; 10(4):278-83. PubMed ID: 10692975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus: site-matched correlation and discrimination of axial BMD status.
Langton CM; Langton DK
Br J Radiol; 2000 Jan; 73(865):31-5. PubMed ID: 10721317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparison of the longitudinal changes in quantitative ultrasound with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: the four-year effects of hormone replacement therapy.
Sahota O; San P; Cawte SA; Pearson D; Hosking DJ
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 10663359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Ability of ultrasound bone profile score (UBPS) to discriminate between fractured and not fractured osteoporotic women.
Di Stefano M; Isaia GC
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2002; 28(11-12):1485-9. PubMed ID: 12498944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Ultrasound measurement of calcaneus: a promising method for prediction of osteoporotic fractures].
van den Bergh JP; Smals AG; Schweitzer DH; Hermus AR
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Jun; 145(23):1105-9. PubMed ID: 11450602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The utility of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, calcaneal quantitative ultrasound, and fracture risk indices (FRAX® and Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument) for the identification of women with distal forearm or hip fractures: A pilot study.
Esmaeilzadeh S; Cesme F; Oral A; Yaliman A; Sindel D
Endocr Res; 2016 Aug; 41(3):248-60. PubMed ID: 26864472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Discriminatory ability of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound in the assessment of bone status in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.
Turk N; Kastelan D; Cukovic-Cavka S; Kraljevic I; Korsic M; Vucelic B
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 33(6):863-9. PubMed ID: 17434664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Discrimination of hip fractures by quantitative ultrasound of the phalanges and the calcaneus and dual X-ray absorptiometry.
Damilakis J; Papadokostakis G; Perisinakis K; Maris T; Dimitriou P; Hadjipavlou A; Gourtsoyiannis N
Eur J Radiol; 2004 Jun; 50(3):268-72. PubMed ID: 15145486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Quantitative ultrasound technique at the phalanges in discriminating between uremic and osteoporotic patients.
Guglielmi G; de Terlizzi F; Aucella F; Scillitani A
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Oct; 60(1):108-14. PubMed ID: 16750341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The discriminatory capacity of BMD measurements by DXA and dual X-ray and laser (DXL) at the calcaneus including clinical risk factors for detecting patients with vertebral fractures.
Muschitz C; Dimai HP; Kocijan R; Kaider A; Zendeli A; Kühne F; Trubrich A; Lung S; Waneck R; Resch H
Osteoporos Int; 2013 Aug; 24(8):2181-90. PubMed ID: 23344258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Ultrasound measurements at the proximal phalanges in healthy women and patients with hip fractures.
Alenfeld FE; Wüster C; Funck C; Pereira-Lima JF; Fritz T; Meeder PJ; Ziegler R
Osteoporos Int; 1998; 8(5):393-8. PubMed ID: 9850344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Palangeal quantitative ultrasound, phalangeal morphometric variables, and vertebral fracture discrimination.
Guglielmi G; Njeh CF; de Terlizzi F; De Serio DA; Scillitani A; Cammisa M; Fan B; Lu Y; Genant HK
Calcif Tissue Int; 2003 Apr; 72(4):469-77. PubMed ID: 12574870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
